Cognitive Functioning in Opioid Use Disorder

March 3, 2025 updated by: Sandra D. Comer, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cognitive Functioning in Opioid Use Disorder: Examining the Impacts of Computerized Working Memory Training and Non-Fatal Opioid Overdose

This outpatient study is designed to examine the potential relationship between non-fatal opioid overdose and cognitive functioning. This study will also examine the impact of computerized working memory training on relevant outcomes (cognition, psychosocial functioning, quality of life, drug use). The training component of the study lasts 1 month, with follow up visits and 1-month and 3-months post training.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This outpatient study is designed to examine the potential relationship between non-fatal opioid overdose (i.e. overdose that does not result in death), cognitive functioning, and the impact of computerized working memory training on relevant outcomes (cognition, psychosocial functioning, quality of life). Participants (n=30) with a history of at least one prior opioid OD, who are enrolled in buprenorphine treatment, will be randomized to 20 sessions of an active (n=15) or sham (n=15) working memory training. Patients will complete measures of cognitive functioning during screening, post-training, and at 1-month and 3-month follow up. Participants will also complete the measures of decision making, psychosocial functioning and drug use at baseline, post-training, and follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • NY State Psychiatric Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for moderate-severe Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) in the past 6 months
  • Enrolled in a suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone) program; willing to provide consent for research team to contact treatment provider
  • History of at least 1 prior opioid overdose
  • Recent history of illicit opioid use
  • In good physical health
  • Access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of a co-occurring, untreated psychiatric condition that would make participation risky or difficulty
  • Lack of access to a home computer, smartphone, or tablet
  • Unable to speak, read and/or communicate in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active
Working memory training with task-difficulty increasing across sessions
20 sessions of Cogmed working memory training
Active Comparator: Sham
Working memory training with task-difficulty remaining constant across sessions.
20 sessions of Cogmed working memory training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery
Time Frame: Post-Training (1-month from baseline)
A brief computerized test of key neuropsychological functions
Post-Training (1-month from baseline)
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery
Time Frame: 1-month Follow up
A brief computerized test of key neuropsychological functions
1-month Follow up
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery
Time Frame: 3-month Follow up
A brief computerized test of key neuropsychological functions
3-month Follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychosocial Functioning (Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning B-IPF)
Time Frame: Post-training (1 month from baseline)
B-IPF: scores range from 0 to 49 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties with psychosocial functioning
Post-training (1 month from baseline)
Psychosocial Functioning (Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning B-IPF)
Time Frame: 1-month follow up
B-IPF: scores range from 0 to 49 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties with psychosocial functioning
1-month follow up
Psychosocial Functioning (Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning B-IPF)
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
B-IPF: scores range from 0 to 49 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties with psychosocial functioning
3-month follow up
Illicit Substance Use: Timeline Follow Back (TLFB)
Time Frame: Post-training (1-month from baseline)
TLFB: measures substance use in the past 1-week period
Post-training (1-month from baseline)
Illicit Substance Use: Timeline Follow Back (TLFB)
Time Frame: 1-month follow up
TLFB: measures substance use in the past 1-week period
1-month follow up
Illicit Substance Use: Timeline Follow Back (TLFB)
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
TLFB: measures substance use in the past 1-week period
3-month follow up
Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
Time Frame: Post-training (1 month from baseline)
QOLS: scores range from 16 to 112 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life
Post-training (1 month from baseline)
Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
Time Frame: 1-month follow up
QOLS: scores range from 16 to 112 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life
1-month follow up
Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
QOLS: scores range from 16 to 112 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life
3-month follow up
Impulsive decision making (Delay Discounting Task)
Time Frame: Post-training (1 month from baseline)
Delay Discounting Task
Post-training (1 month from baseline)
Impulsive decision making (Delay Discounting Task)
Time Frame: 1-month follow up
Delay Discounting Task
1-month follow up
Impulsive decision making (Delay Discounting Task)
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Delay Discounting Task
3-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Change

Clinical Trials on CogMed

Subscribe