Validation of Point Partial User Needs With Partial Finger Amputees

The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Partial system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial finger amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Point Partial

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 5
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Colorado
    • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
      • University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus
    • Lafayette, Colorado, United States, 80026
      • Point Designs

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Partial finger amputees with partial absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
• Fluent in English
• Individuals aged 18 or greater
• Patients may present with either fused or mobile MCP joints.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
• Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
• Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
• Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon OT evaluation
• Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prosthesis; Patient is temporarily fit with Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system	Device: Point Partial; The Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical partial digits and mounting brackets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test	User wears Point Partial(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be comfortable for a full day's use. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (8 hours)
VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test	User flexes and extends the Point Partial(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag	User lifts a 25 lb. bag with Point Partial(s) (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer	User grips a hammer with Point Partial(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test	User releases Point Partial(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be releasable while performing active grasps. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test	User positions Point Partial(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test	User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh throughout day without failed extension (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test	User grips a 5 lb. cylindrical smooth object using Point Partial(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have high grip surface friction. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test	User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a pronounced fingernail. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test	User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robustly attached to mounting system. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.	Day 1 (8 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Point Designs
• Collaborators: University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 3, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 31, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 12, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 12, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): August 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): November 8, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 21, 2024
• Last Verified: August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Amputation, Traumatic
• Other Study ID Numbers: 299089

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No