A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System (SUMMIT MAX)

April 7, 2025 updated by: Route 92 Medical, Inc.

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Interventional Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System for Aspiration Embolectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients (SUMMIT MAX)

The SUMMIT MAX study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System with the Hi Point 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of the SUMMIT MAX study is to obtain the safety and effectiveness data necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System with a predicate aspiration device to support a 510(k) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the classification product code, NRY.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
        • Auckland City Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85202
        • Banner Health
    • California
      • Carmichael, California, United States, 95608
        • Mercy San Juan Medical Center
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19718
        • Christiana Care
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • Baptist Jacksonville
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
        • Baptist Hospital of Miami
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60657
        • Advocate Aurora Health
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40503
        • Baptist Health Lexington
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • Saint Luke's
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper Health System
      • Piscataway, New Jersey, United States, 08854
        • Rutgers
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
        • Ohio Health
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45409
        • Wright State University
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43608
        • Mercy Health St. Vincent
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97219
        • OHSU
    • Pennsylvania
      • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
        • Geisinger Clinic
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37902
        • Fort Sanders Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern
      • Harlingen, Texas, United States, 78550
        • Valley Baptist
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75075
        • Medical City Plano
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84123
        • University of Utah
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
        • West Virginia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The consent process has been completed and documented according to applicable country regulations and as approved by the IRB / Ethics Committee
  2. Age >=18 years
  3. Patient presenting with clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
  4. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >= 6
  5. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Score (mRS) <= 2
  6. Baseline ASPECTS >= 6
  7. Endovascular treatment initiated (defined as time of groin puncture) within 8 hours from time last known well
  8. If indicated, thrombolytic therapy shall be initiated per clinical guidelines. If eligible for thrombolytic therapy, subjects should be treated as soon as possible and lytic use should not be delayed regardless of potential eligibility for mechanical neurothrombectomy.
  9. The patient is indicated for aspiration neurothrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System as determined by the Investigator
  10. Angiographic confirmation of a large vessel occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery or distal internal carotid artery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known pregnancy or breast feeding
  2. In the Investigator's opinion, any known comorbidity (including COVID-19 positivity) that may complicate treatment or prevent improvement or follow-up
  3. Known serious, advanced, or terminal illness with anticipated life expectancy < 12 months
  4. Known history of severe allergy to contrast medium
  5. Known to have suffered a stroke in the past 90 days
  6. Known connective tissue disorder affecting the arteries (e.g. Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
  7. Any known previous cerebral hemorrhagic event
  8. Any known pre-existing coagulation deficiency
  9. Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR >3.0
  10. Known baseline platelet count <50,000/µL
  11. Known baseline blood glucose of <50 mg/dL or >400 mg/dL
  12. Known to be participating in another study involving an investigational device or drug
  13. Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
  14. Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evidence of recent/ fresh cerebral hemorrhage (the presence of microbleeds is allowed)
  15. Baseline CT or MRI showing intracranial tumor (except small meningioma <= 2cm) or significant mass effect with midline shift due to the tumor
  16. Presumed septic thrombus, or suspicion of bacterial endocarditis
  17. Inability to access the cerebral vasculature in the opinion of the neurointerventional team
  18. Unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (e.g. no fixed home address)
  19. Evidence of arterial dissection in a vessel that must be traversed
  20. Evidence of high-grade stenosis or occlusion (i.e., tandem occlusion) in a vessel that must be traversed
  21. Known active or recent history of cocaine or methamphetamine abuse (within last 6 months)
  22. Known history or presence of aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target lesion
  23. For all patients, severe sustained hypertension with SBP >200 and/or DBP >120; for patients treated with a lytic, sustained hypertension despite treatment with SBP >185 and/or DBP >110
  24. Treatment with heparin within 48 hours with a partial thromboplastic time more than two times the laboratory normal or treatment with any LMWH within 48 hours
  25. Renal failure with serum creatinine >3.0 or Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <30
  26. Ongoing seizure due to stroke
  27. Evidence of active systemic infection
  28. Known cancer with metastases
  29. Angiographic evidence of a dissection in the extracranial or intracranial cerebral arteries
  30. Arterial stenosis requiring balloon angioplasty or stenting at the time of the procedure
  31. Angiographic evidence of multiple cerebrovascular occlusions (e.g., bilateral anterior circulation, anterior/posterior circulation, tandem occlusions)
  32. Angiographic evidence of known or suspected underlying intracranial vasculopathy or atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion
  33. Angiographic evidence or suspicion of aortic dissection
  34. Angiographic evidence of an aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target lesion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aspiration Predicate
Aspiration thrombectomy with a predicate aspiration device to treat acute ischemic stroke
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction.
Experimental: Route 92 Medical Monopoint Reperfusion System
Aspiration thrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical HiPoint 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters as part of the Monopoint Reperfusion System to treat acute ischemic stroke
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects with successful arterial revascularization defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater
Time Frame: During procedure
mTICI of 2b or greater indicates successful reperfusion following blood clot removal
During procedure
Incidence of all symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH)
Time Frame: within 24 hours post-procedure
Evaluation of sICH per von Kummer et al
within 24 hours post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guilherme Dabus, MD, Baptist Health - Miami
  • Principal Investigator: Ajit Puri, MD, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
  • Principal Investigator: Thanh Nguyen, MD, Boston Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 19, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System

Subscribe