Long-term Neurocognitive and Psychiatric Consequences in Severe COVID-19 Survivors. (NPQCOVID)

August 25, 2021 updated by: Constanza Caneo, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Long-term Neurocognitive and Psychiatric Consequences of COVID-19 in Patients Discharged From Critical Care Units. A Cohort Study of the Advance Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Register (AIRR) Covid-19 Working Group.

Long-term neurocognitive and psychiatric consequences of COVID-19 remain mostly unknown to date. It has been reported that coronaviruses cause direct central nervous system infection (Needham et al. 2020). Besides that, new or worsening cognitive impairment commonly occurs and persists in survivors of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (Hosey & Needham. 2020). The purpose of our study is to search and describe the cognitive and psychiatric long-term consequences of COVID-19 on patients who have been discharged from critical care units. This is an ambidirectional cohort study, that attempts to follow adults discharged from critical Care Units Adults due to COVID-19 up to 12 months after discharge, to evaluate the presence of cognitive impairment, linguistic and phonation function, depression, fatigue, functional gastroenterological symptoms, anxiety, or post traumatic disorder, and performance in activities of daily living and physical response to exercise as well.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Constanza Caneo, MD
  • Phone Number: +56942909250
  • Email: cmcaneo@uc.cl

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Santiago, Chile, 8320000
        • Recruiting
        • Centro de Investigaciones Médicas, Centro de Investigación Clínica UC, Hospital Clínico UC, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Red UC-Christus, Campus Clínico San JoaPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
        • Contact:
          • Constanza Caneo, MD
          • Phone Number: +56942909250
          • Email: cmcaneo@uc.cl
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Felipe Leon, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francisco Palacios, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carolina Astudillo, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Felix Bacigalupo, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claudia Gonzalez, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bernardita Soler, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jaime Godoy, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sebastian Bravo, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claudia Saez, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Luis Rojas, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

COVID-19 patients over 18 years of age discharged from critical care units at Red de Salud UC Christus who presented MoCA® cognitive test result less than 26 points at the time of discharge.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults over 18 years of age who have been hospitalized at critical care units, who were admitted for a diagnosis of COVID-19 and who present a score on the MOCA® cognitive test of less than 26 points at the time of hospital discharge .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of underlying cognitive disorder. History of underlying primary psychotic disorder. MOCA® cognitive test score greater than or equal to 26 points at the time of hospital discharge.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
COVID-19 patients discharged from critical care units
Adults over 18 years of age who have been hospitalized after COVID-19 diagnosis in the critical care units of Red Salud UC Christus who have been cognitively evaluated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) days prior to their discharge. All patients with a previous history of confirmed neurocognitive or psychotic disorders, prior to hospital admission, were excluded.
COVID-19 severity between 4 to 7 points according the seven-category scale of clinical status reported by Huang et al. (2021) and severe to critical symptomatic levels on spectrum of disease reported by Wu and McGoogan (2020).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive impairment screening
Time Frame: 12 months

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA®). Evaluation of cognitive domains (visuospatial, executive function; attention and memory; orientation; language).

Min score: 0 Max score: 30 Cut-off for chilean population: < 21 for mild cognitive impairment. < 20 for dementia

Setting: Home and online

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive performance
Time Frame: 12 months

Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB®)

Included tests:

Reaction time test, (RTI) Paired associate learning (PAL) Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Spatial Span (SSP) Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT) Intra/Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) Stockings of Cambridge (SOC)

Scores: z-scores normalized by sex and educational level

Setting: Home

12 months
Neurological Soft Signs
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: Heidelberg Neurological Soft Signs Scale

16 items on five factors ("motor coordination": Ozeretzki's test, diadochokinesis, pronation/supination, finger-to-thumb opposition, speech and articulation; "sensory integration": gait, tandem walking, two-point discrimination; "complex motor tasks": finger-to-nose test, fist-edge-palm test; "right/left and spatial orientation": right/left orientation, graphesthesia, face-hand test, stereognosis; "hard signs": arm holding test, mirror movements). All items except for gait, tandem gait, Ozeretzki's test, speech and articulation and right/left orientation are assessed separately for both, right and left sites respectively. Ratings are given on a 0-3 point scale (no/slight/moderate/marked abnormality).

Higher scores mean worse outcomes. Min score: 0 Max score: 48 No cut-off point established in the literature.

Setting: Home

12 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score

The seven items assess (1) feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge; (2) being able to stop or control worrying; (3) worrying too much about different things; (4) trouble relaxing; (5) being restless; (6) becoming easily annoyed or irritable; and (7) feeling afraid as if something awful might happen.

Increasing scores on the scale are strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment and increasing anxiety.

The cut-off point suggested is of ≥10 Min score: 0 Max score: 21

Setting: online

12 months
Depressive syndrome
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: Patient Health Questionary-2 (PHQ-2) score for screening of depressive syndrome

The cut-off point suggested is of ≥3 Min score: 0 Max score: 6

Setting: online

12 months
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: Post Traumatic Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5) score

20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The cut-off point suggested is of ≥33 Min score: 0 Max score: 80

Setting: online

12 months
Physical disability
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: Barthel Index score

Measures physical disability behaviour relating to activities of daily living.

Scores of 0-20 indicate "total" dependency, 21-60 indicate "severe" dependency, 61-90 indicate "moderate" dependency, and 91-99 indicates "slight" dependency.

Setting: online

12 months
Exercise endurance
Time Frame: 12 months

Performance on 6 minutes- walk test

Evaluation of aerobic capacity and exercise endurance.

Setting: Home

12 months
Fatigue
Time Frame: 12 months

Measured by the Modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS). The MFIS is a modified version of the 40-item Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), which was originally developed to assess the effects of fatigue on quality of life in patients with chronic diseases. The FIS has patients rate the extent to which fatigue has affected their life in the past 4 weeks on a questionnaire consisting of 10 "physical" items, 10 "cognitive" items, and 20 "social" items, with 0 indicating "no problem" and 4 indicating "extreme problem."

The cut-off point suggested is of ≥38 Min score: 0 Max score: 160

Setting: online

12 months
Global functionality
Time Frame: 12 months

Post-Covid-19 functional scale 5 levels of severity, where o is non impairment and 5 is the highest level of impairment.

Setting: online

12 months
Quality of life related to health
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: The 5-level EuroQol 5D health questionnaire. (EQ-5D-5L) Self rated.

Min score: 0 Max score: 100 highest score means worst quality of life.

Setting: online

12 months
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 12 months
Dynamometry Setting: Home
12 months
Pain severity
Time Frame: 12 months

Scale: Stanford pain scale

Min: 0 represents no pain Max: 10 represents unimaginable or unspeakable pain Setting: online

12 months
Spontaneous Speech
Time Frame: 12 months

Spontaneous Speech is a useful research tool to assess the scope of language disorders in people with neurological deficits. Short samples be analyzed during a brief interview and based of 10 linguistics parameters, it will characterized level and the type of language deficit. The 10 linguistic parameters are based on the ALEA method

Setting: Home and online

12 months
Verbal fluency
Time Frame: 12 months

Verbal fluency (phonological and sematic) will be assed by requesting the participants to elicit word under 1 minute for letter F, A and S and for the category animals.

Setting: Home and online

12 months
complex post-traumatic stress disorder
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: International Trauma Questionnaire self-report measure for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD), corresponding to the diagnostic criteria in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11).

Setting: online

12 months
irritable bowel syndrome
Time Frame: 12 months
Rome IV criteria Setting: online
12 months
Insomnia
Time Frame: 12 months

Scale: Pittsburgh insomnia rating scale

Seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.

Setting: online

12 months
Dysautonomia
Time Frame: 12 months

Scales: Scales for outcomes in Parkinson's dysfunction-autonomic (SCOPA-AUT), Orthostatic hypotension symptom assessment (OHSA) and Orthostatic hypotension activity scale (OHACT).

Setting: online

12 months
Dyspnea
Time Frame: 12 months

Test: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT).

Min: 0 Max: 40 CAT ≥10 corresponds to either GOLD Group B or D. Group B patients' preferred treatment is to start either on LABA, or LAMA and if persistent symptoms then combination LAMA/LABA therapy-these are the minimum for patients with CAT Score ≥10.

CAT <10 corresponds to GOLD Group A or C. Group A patients' preferred treatment is to start bronchodilator (LABA or LAMA) and evaluate the effect.

Setting: online

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rafael Medina, PhD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Study Director: Arnoldo Riquelme, PhD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Constanza Caneo, MD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Carolina Mendez, PhD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We are available to be contacted by researchers aiming to conduct secondary analyses based on our study, after providing a study protocol based on international guidelines, in order to ensure adequate use of our data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

January 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

contact to responsable researcher C Caneo

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Exposure: COVID-19 severity

Subscribe