- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05029219
Virtual Reality Intervention Procedure Simulator
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study for the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Intervention Procedure Simulator on the Training of Pain Procedures
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Gangnam Severance Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Residents in department of anesthesiology and pain medicine unfamiliar with fluoroscopy guided epidural block
Exclusion Criteria:
- Residents in department of anesthesiology and pain medicine familiar with fluoroscopy guided epidural block
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Virtual reality group
To become proficient in lumbar transforaminal epidural blocks, participants receive additional training using virtual reality programs after audiovisual education.
|
In the preparatory session, the participant is given a survey. It is about demographic information such as gender, age, and age, as well as prior experience with the procedure. The primary test is performed with a fluoroscopy guided lumbar transforaminal epidural block with a human-shaped phantom. After that, the test group and the control group receive the same audiovisual education for about 5 minutes. The test group receives about 60 minutes of training using a virtual reality program. |
|
Active Comparator: Self study group
In order to become proficient in lumbar transforaminal epidural block, participants have self-study time using books and videos after audiovisual education.
|
In the preparatory session, the participant is given a survey. It is about demographic information such as gender, age, and age, as well as prior experience with the procedure. The primary test is performed with a fluoroscopy guided lumbar transforaminal epidural block with a human-shaped phantom. After that, the test group and the control group receive the same audiovisual education for about 5 minutes. The control group have provided with video materials and books provided during audiovisual education and have given time for self-study for 60 minutes. Subsequently, a second test is performed with a fluroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural block with a human-shaped phantom. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Checklist score
Time Frame: 60 min of education programs
|
When all training courses are completed and a post-test is performed on the phantom, it is determined how much the checklist score has changed compared to the screening time. Range from 0 to 7. Minimum score means worst and maximum score means good performance. |
60 min of education programs
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Global rating score
Time Frame: 60 min of education programs
|
When all training courses are completed and a post-test is performed on the phantom, it is determined how much the global rating score has changed compared to the screening time. Range from 7 to 35. Minimum score means worst and maximum score means good performance. |
60 min of education programs
|
|
Time taken to perform lumbar transforaminal epidural injection
Time Frame: Procedure duration
|
During the pre-test and post-test, how long it takes to perform the procedure is compared.
|
Procedure duration
|
|
Number of fluroscopy shots when performing lumbar transforaminal epidural injection under a fluoroscopy guide
Time Frame: Procedure duration
|
It is determined by comparing the number of fluroscopy pictures
|
Procedure duration
|
|
Participants' satisfaction with the curriculum
Time Frame: 60 min of education programs
|
After the completion of all training and testing sessions, have participants rate their satisfaction with the training on a 100-point scale. Range from 0 to 100. Minimum score means less satisfaction and maximum score means better satisfaction. |
60 min of education programs
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3-2021-0237
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Novice Doctor
-
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research...CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Novice DoctorTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaState Farm Insurance Co.; Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital; GFK Knowledge NetworksCompletedNovice Teen Driver TrainingUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedVideo Laryngoscopic Device Usage in Novice Users
-
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)CompletedPatient Doctor Trust
-
Singapore General HospitalRecruitingDoctor-Patient RelationSingapore
-
Western University of Health SciencesCompleted
-
Tobias Moeller-BertramUniversity of California, San Diego; Metamorphosis, LLCCompletedIntensive Meditation in Novice and Experienced MeditatorsUnited States
-
X-Nav Technologies, LLCCompletedDoctor Efficiency | Dental Prosthesis FitUnited States
-
Duke UniversityCompletedCommunication | Bias, Racial | Relation, Doctor PatientUnited States
-
Nanne KleefstraCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Doctor Satisfaction | Duration of ConsultationNetherlands
Clinical Trials on Arm I (Virtual reality group)
-
Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityRecruitingVirtual RealityTurkey
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompletedFistulas Arteriovenous | Hemodialysis PatientTurkey (Türkiye)
-
European University of MadridRecruiting
-
Northwestern UniversityRecruitingPain, ChronicUnited States
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiNot yet recruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urodynamic Studies | Urodynamics
-
Uşak UniversityRecruitingAnxiety | Virtual Reality | CystoscopyTurkey
-
Sevgi BeyazgülNot yet recruitingVirtual Reality | Educational
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaEnrolling by invitationIdiopathic Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Izmir Tinaztepe UniversityCompletedTonsillectomy | AdenoidectomyTurkey
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiEnrolling by invitationSimulation | Nursing Education | Virtual Reality | Nursing Students | Clinical PracticeTurkey