- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05031767
Remote Monitoring of Axial Spondyloarthritis (ReMonit)
Remote Monitoring of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Specialist Healthcare Services
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The trial will include Norwegian adult males and females with axial spondyloarthritis.
240 participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to either:
- Control group: a. Usual care, i.e. conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and pre-scheduled visits at the hospital every 6th month
- Remote monitoring: hospital health professionals (HPs) perform remote monitoring of frequent PROs, blood test results, and physical activity data available on a digital platform
- Patient-initiated care: no pre-scheduled visits or remote monitoring
The study has 18 months follow-up. We will use a 15% non-inferiority margin.
The study will also include qualitative research including semi-structured interviews and observations of patients in the two intervention groups and health professionals involved in the study. The interviews will explore experiences with remote monitoring and video consultations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0319
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or non-pregnant, non-nursing female >18 years of age at screening
- Patients with a diagnosis of axSpA who fulfil the diagnostic Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA
- Stable medical treatment with TNFi the last 6 months
- Low disease activity (ASDAS<2.1) at inclusion
- Capable of understanding the Norwegian language and of signing an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
Medical conditions:
- Major co-morbidities, such as severe malignancies, severe diabetes mellitus, severe infections, uncontrollable hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA class III or IV), severe respiratory diseases, and/or cirrhosis.
- Indications of active tuberculosis (TB)
Diagnostic assessments:
- Abnormal renal function, defined as serum creatinine >142 µmol/L in female and >168 µmol/L in male, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Abnormal liver function (defined as Alanine Transaminase (ALT) >3x upper normal limit), active or recent hepatitis
- Leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia
Other:
- Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding (current at screening or planned within the duration of the study)
- Severe psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse or other substance abuse, language barriers or other factors which makes adherence to the study protocol impossible
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Usual care
Conventional current follow-up strategy
|
Conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests, patient-reported outcomes, and pre-scheduled visits at the hospital every 6th month. Continue using medical treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Patients will be instructed to use NSAIDs should they experience minor worsening of symptoms, but if the patients experience significant symptom worsening and suspect a severe disease worsening (flare) or adverse events, they will be instructed contact the hospital. |
|
Experimental: Remote monitoring
Remote monitoring by health professionals at the hospital
|
Hospital health professionals perform remote monitoring of frequent patient-reported outcomes, blood test results, and physical activity data available on a digital platform. Continue using medical treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Patients will be instructed to use NSAIDs should they experience minor worsening of symptoms, but if the patients experience significant symptom worsening and suspect a severe disease worsening (flare) or adverse events, they will be instructed contact the hospital . |
|
Experimental: Patient-initiated care
No pre-scheduled visits or remote monitoring.
|
No pre-scheduled visits or remote monitoring. Continue using medical treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Patients will be instructed to use NSAIDs should they experience minor worsening of symptoms, but if the patients experience significant symptom worsening and suspect a severe disease worsening (flare) or adverse events, they will be instructed contact the hospital. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Low disease activity at follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The proportion of patients with low disease activity (defined as ASDAS <2.1) at the 6-months follow-up
|
6 months
|
|
Low disease activity at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The proportion of patients with low disease activity (defined as ASDAS <2.1) at the 12- months follow-up
|
12 months
|
|
Low disease activity at follow-up
Time Frame: 18 months
|
The proportion of patients with low disease activity (defined as ASDAS <2.1) at the 18-months follow-up
|
18 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a clinical measure of disease activity calculated from four patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) (or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) if CRP is not available).
The formula for calculating ASDAS CRP = 0.12 × back pain + 0.06 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.11 × patient global + 0.07 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.58×Ln(CRP + 1)).
Higher values indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)
Time Frame: Every month, maximum 18 months
|
Monthly for a subgroup among the Remote monitoring group.
ASDAS is a clinical measure of disease activity calculated from four PROs and CRP (or ESR if CRP is not available).
The formula for calculating ASDAS CRP = 0.12 × back pain + 0.06 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.11 × patient global + 0.07 × peripheral pain/swelling + 0.58×Ln(CRP + 1)).
Higher values indicate worse outcome.
|
Every month, maximum 18 months
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on 6 items using a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10.
The score is the sum (of the first four individual questions and the mean of questions five and six) divided by five.
The sum score range 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: Every month, maximum 18 months
|
Monthly reported by the Remote monitoring group if disease worsening.
Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on 6 items using a NRS 0-10.
The score is the sum (of the first four individual questions and the mean of questions five and six) divided by five.
The sum score range 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Every month, maximum 18 months
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
|
Reported every third month by the Patient-initiated care group if disease worsening.
Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on 6 items using a NRS 0-10.
The score is the sum (of the first four individual questions and the mean of questions five and six) divided by five.
The sum score range 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: Every month, maximum 18 months
|
Reported monthly by the a subgroup among the Remote monitoring group.
Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on 6 items using a NRS 0-10.
The score is the sum (of the first four individual questions and the mean of questions five and six) divided by five.
The sum score range 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Every month, maximum 18 months
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Every month, maximum 18 months
|
CRP measured at home in a subgroup among the Remote monitoring group
|
Every month, maximum 18 months
|
|
Patient global assessment of disease activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on a NRS 0-10 ; higher value indicate worse outcome
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Patient global assessment of disease activity
Time Frame: Every month, maximum 18 months
|
Monthly reported by the Remote monitoring group.
Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on a NRS 0-10 ; higher value indicate worse outcome
|
Every month, maximum 18 months
|
|
Patient global assessment of disease activity
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
|
Reported every third month by the Patient-initiated care group: Patient-reported disease activity last 7 days on a NRS 0-10 ; higher value indicate worse outcome
|
3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
|
|
Patient-reported flare
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain.
If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
|
6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Patient-reported flare
Time Frame: Every month, maximum 18 months
|
Monthly reported by the Remote monitoring group.
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain.
If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
|
Every month, maximum 18 months
|
|
Patient-reported flare
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
|
Reported every third month by the Patient-initiated care group.
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain.
If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
|
3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
10 item questionnaire (NRS 0-10) used to assess disease activity last 7 days.
The score is the sum of each individual question divided by 10, higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Activity Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Patient-reported global change in disease activity
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Single item with seven-point response scale ranging from "Much worse" to "Much better".
|
6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Patient-reported global change in activity impairment
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Single item with seven-point response scale ranging from "Much worse" to "Much better".
|
6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Pain (general)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Self-reported pain level last 7 days hours on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Joint pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Self-reported joint pain level last 7 days hours on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Sleep impairment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
1 item from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-reported sleep impairment in last month due to pain with 4 response categories ranging "Not during the past month" to "Three or more times a week" ; higher value indicate worse outcome.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Patient satisfaction with care
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
1 item with five point response options ranging from "Very satisfied" to "Very dissatisfied", higher value indicate better outcome
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Daily steps
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
Remote monitoring and Patient-initiated care groups, number of steps during daytime captured by wearing a smartwatch
|
Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
|
Mean pulse level
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
Remote monitoring and Patient-initiated care groups, mean pulse level during daytime captured by wearing a smartwatch
|
Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
|
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
6 item utility instrument for measurement of health related quality of life, 5 first items with 5 response categories, item no.6: self-reported health status on a 0-100 mm scale
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Concomitant medication
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Self-reported use of NSAIDs and analgesics and national register data from The Norwegian Prescription Register
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Swollen joint count
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
For the Control group, examiner assessed metacarpophalangeal (MCP) 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) 1-5, wrists, elbows, shoulders, ankles, forefeet
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Swollen joint count
Time Frame: Baseline, through study completion, and 18 months
|
At extra visits/withdrawals/early discontinuation in the Remote monitoring and Patient-initiated care groups, For the Control group, examiner assessed MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrists, elbows, shoulders, ankles, forefeet
|
Baseline, through study completion, and 18 months
|
|
Tender joint count
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
For the Control group, examiner assessed MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrists, elbows, shoulders, ankles, forefeet
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Tender joint count
Time Frame: Baseline, through study completion, and 18 months
|
At extra visits/withdrawals/early discontinuation in the Remote monitoring and Patient-initiated care groups, For the Control group, examiner assessed MCP1-5, PIP 1-5, wrists, elbows, shoulders, ankles, forefeet
|
Baseline, through study completion, and 18 months
|
|
Heel enthesitis
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
For the Control group, the presence of heel enthesitis is examined clinically by a health professional.
Scored as not present/present right heel/present left heel/present both heels.
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Heel enthesitis
Time Frame: Baseline, through study completion, and 18 months
|
At extra visits/withdrawals/early discontinuation in the Remote monitoring and Patient-initiated care groups, , the presence of heel enthesitis is examined clinically by a health professional.
Scored as not present/present right heel/present left heel/present both heels.
|
Baseline, through study completion, and 18 months
|
|
Costs related to hospital visits
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Self-reported way of transport to the hospital; walking or bicycling/private car/public transportation/taxi/airplane/other.
|
Baseline
|
|
Costs related to hospital visits
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Self-reported travel distance in kilometres to the hospital.
|
Baseline
|
|
The need to take time off work for hospital visits or video consultations
Time Frame: Baseline
|
If in paid work, the need to take time off from work is indicated as yes or no.
|
Baseline
|
|
Health care utilization
Time Frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
Self-reported health care use and national register data on consultations and treatment in secondary and primary health care
|
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months
|
|
Extra visits, telephone and video consultations
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
Number of extra visits to the hospital or video consultations with a health care provider
|
Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
|
Withdrawals/Early discontinuation
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
Number of withdrawals/early discontinuation
|
Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
Number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals because of adverse events.
|
Through study completion, maximum 18 months
|
|
Patient-reported self-efficacy for using different digital devices, secure login and digital health services measured on a Likert scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Self-efficacy/confidence in using smartphone, tablet, computer, app's, secure login and digital health services.
6 items with Likert scale response categories: Never used, Very bad, Bad, Neither good nor bad, Good, Very good.
Score range 1-5; higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
|
Baseline
|
|
eHealth literacy
Time Frame: Baseline
|
20 items from 4 domains of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ).
Four point response scale, sum domain score range 1-4.
Lower scores indicate lower eHealth literacy.
|
Baseline
|
|
Body signs and symptoms
Time Frame: 18 months
|
To what degree do you understand your body's signs and symptoms.
Single item, 4-point Likert scale (not at all - to a large degree + do not know-option)
|
18 months
|
|
Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring or patient-initiated care
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) reported by the Remote monitoring group.
22 items in 5 subscales.
Score range 1-6.
Higher scores in subscales 1,2 and 5/lower scores in subscales 3 and 4 indicate higher acceptability with telehealth.
|
18 months
|
|
Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring or patient-initiated care
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) reported by the Patient-initiated care group.
3 of 22 items: #1, #10 and #11.
Score range 1-6.
Higher scores in indicate higher acceptability with telehealth.
|
18 months
|
|
Preferred follow-up strategy
Time Frame: 18 months
|
One item on whether the preferred follow-up strategy would be Remote monitoring or Patient-initated care reported by the two intervention groups only.
|
18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Tore Kvien, MD, Professor em, Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- REK no.:229187
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Axial Spondyloarthritis
-
University of BonnNovartis; Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingAxial Spondyloarthritis | Axial and Peripheral Spondyloarthritis | Axial Spondyloarthopathy | Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis | Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) | Axial Spondylarthritis (r-axSpA) | Axial Spondyloarthritis, Non-RadiographicGermany
-
Lingli DongNot yet recruitingNon-Radiographical Axial Spondyloarthritis | Nr-axial SpondyloarthritisChina
-
Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical (Shanghai) Co.,...Not yet recruitingAxial Spondyloarthritis, Non-RadiographicChina
-
Suzhou Suncadia Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.RecruitingA Trial of SHR-1314 Injection in Adult Patients With Active Non-radiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisActive Non-radiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisChina
-
UCB Biopharma SRLCompletedNonradiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisUnited States, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalNot yet recruitingEffectiveness and Safety of Acemetacin in Active Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Real-world Study (ARISE)Axial Spondyloarthritis | Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) / Radiographic Axial SpA (r-axSpA) | Axial Spondyloarthritis, Non-RadiographicChina
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsActive, not recruitingNon-radiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisItaly, Germany, Thailand, Israel, Belgium, France, Hungary, Malaysia, Poland, Philippines, Colombia, Mexico, Romania, Czechia, Brazil, Netherlands, Vietnam, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical (Shanghai) Co.,...RecruitingAxial SpondyloarthritisChina
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedSpondyloarthritisCzechia, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedNon-radiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisChina
Clinical Trials on Usual care
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | FatigueGermany
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyMammazentrum Hamburg am Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Germany; Dorit und Alexander...Completed
-
European Institute for Evidence Based Osteopathic...Unknown
-
Suzanna ZickUniversity of MichiganTerminatedQuality of Life | Fatigue | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Sleep | Pain, ChronicUnited States
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedOsteoarthritis | Mindfulness | MBSRFrance
-
Gachon University Gil Oriental Medical HospitalKorea Health Industry Development InstituteCompletedKnee Replacement | AcupunctureKorea, Republic of
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
The Miriam HospitalNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart FailureUnited States
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUnknownDepression | Quality of Life | Sleep | Anxiety | Dry EyeCanada