Village Malaria Worker Expansion (CAM-VMW)

April 4, 2023 updated by: University of Oxford

Expanding the Roles of Village Malaria Workers: Operational Research in Cambodia

This project will conduct pragmatic operational research in rural communities served by approximately 12 health centres and 120 village malaria workers in Battambang/Pailin, western Cambodia.

This study is funded by Global Fund/Regional Artemisinin Initiative (RAI3E). The grant reference number is QSE-M-UNOPS-MORU-20864-007-42

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is an integration of activities with the South and Southeast Asian Community-based Trials Network (SEACTN) that is ongoing in Lao PDR and Bangladesh. The SEACTN study aims to identify the most relevant ways in which village health worker roles can be expanded to include management of community febrile illness. A number of SEACTN activities will also be conducted in Cambodia alongside this project.

For this project, the study team will test specific examples of expanded roles of VMWs including testing for other causes of fever in people who are malaria negative and assessing the feasibility of diagnostics other than malaria RDTs at health centres. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to determine acceptability, a mixed-methods approach will be used for the assessment:

• Quantitative method

Participants with febrile illness attending village malaria workers will be tested by novel rapid diagnostic tests (Dengue and CRP rapid test) in addition to a standard malaria test. Village malaria workers (VMWs)/ mobile malaria workers (MMWs) will be trained to conduct a package of activities ((i) hygiene and sanitation; (ii) disease surveillance; (iii) EPI and ANC support; (iv) management of mild common illnesses that they will carry out alongside their usual role of testing (RDTs) and treating malaria. If possible, within a week of conducting a novel RDT, a well-being follow up will be undertaken by the VMW, either via telephone or face-to-face. For the primary outcomes, the study team will report numbers and proportions of training modules passed, malaria tests performed, new diagnostic tests performed correctly, algorithms followed correctly, number of consultations, coverage estimates, and the study team will use the national malaria information system to provide a comparison in activity levels compared to other areas of Cambodia. The study team will record the incidence and aetiology of febrile illnesses.

• Qualitative method

A set of interviews/discussions with health centre staffs and local stakeholders will be conducted to refine the intervention design and implementation strategy. To this end, the interviews will elicit the views and experience of local stakeholders on (1) health care needs and gaps in local communities, (2) views and past experiences concerning the implementation of the VMW programme, with a focus on challenges and good practices around the use of RDTs, and (3) their views about suitable methods and strategies to expand the current VMW programme considering the new technologies available.

Findings from the study will highlight to the wider scientific community the benefits and challenges of expanding the roles of VMW/MMWs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

7000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Battambang, Cambodia
        • Recruiting
        • Action for Health and Development
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. Quantitative research

    Participants: Febrile patients attending village malaria workers (VMWs)

  2. Qualitative research

2.1 Health centre-based evaluation of novel diagnostics

Participants: Health centre staffs from 12 rural health centres

2.2 Stakeholder analysis

Participants: Key stakeholders , for example health managers and health professionals:

  • the director, deputy-directors, and technical officers at the National Malaria Control Program;
  • the directors and deputy-directors of the Provincial Health Departments in Battambang and Pailin province;
  • health officers actively involved in community-based (malaria) programmes at the district levels in Battambang and Pailin provinces;
  • health workers (i.e., nurses or doctors) actively involved in community-based (malaria) programmes in Battambang and Pailin provinces;
  • community representatives and village malaria workers from villages in both Battambang Pailin province.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Quantitative research

    • Written informed consent
    • Willingness to provide blood sample
    • Fever (≥37.5 C) or history of fever within 24 hours
  2. Qualitative research

2.1 Health centre-based evaluation of novel diagnostics

  • Health centre staff who have received training in the use of the novel diagnostics used in the study
  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study

2.2 Stakeholder analysis

  • Adults, male or female, aged 18 years and over
  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Quantitative research

    • Participants requires urgent medical attention

  2. Qualitative research

    • Identified with intellectual and/or cognitive disability
    • History of or current psychiatric illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with febrile illness
Febrile patients attending village malaria workers (VMWs)
Health centre staffs
Health centre staffs from 12 rural health centres
Key stakeholders

Key stakeholders , for example health managers and health professionals:

  • the director, deputy-directors, and technical officers at the National Malaria Control Program;
  • the directors and deputy-directors of the Provincial Health Departments in Battambang and Pailin province;
  • health officers actively involved in community-based (malaria) programmes at the district levels in Battambang and Pailin provinces;
  • health workers (i.e., nurses or doctors) actively involved in community-based (malaria) programmes in Battambang and Pailin provinces;
  • community representatives and village malaria workers from villages in both Battambang Pailin province.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of VMW consultations by patients
Time Frame: Approximately 18-24 months
The number of VMW consultations by patients with a febrile and/or non-febrile illness along with the number of malaria RDTs used will be recorded. Comparing these data across the different intervention packages introduced for VMWs.
Approximately 18-24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of VMWs that can correctly perform RDTS following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire.
Time Frame: Approximately 18-24 months
The number of VMWs that can correctly perform RDTS following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire.
Approximately 18-24 months
The number of VMWs who correctly follow the treatment algorithms following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire.
Time Frame: Approximately 18-24 months
The number of VMWs who correctly follow the treatment algorithms following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire.
Approximately 18-24 months
The overall consensus of stakeholders regarding the new roles of VMWs following stakeholder interviews
Time Frame: 0 months, mid-point of the study (12 months) and at study completion (24 months)
The overall consensus of stakeholders regarding the new roles of VMWs following stakeholder interviews
0 months, mid-point of the study (12 months) and at study completion (24 months)
The overall consensus of stakeholders of the impact on non-malarial febrile illness management following stakeholder interviews
Time Frame: 0 months, mid-point of the study (12 months) and at study completion (24 months)
The overall consensus of stakeholders of the impact on non-malarial febrile illness management following stakeholder interviews
0 months, mid-point of the study (12 months) and at study completion (24 months)
The number of VMWs that can correctly deliver one of four health intervention packages following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire.
Time Frame: 0 months, mid-point of the study (12 months) and at study completion (24 months)
The number of VMWs that can correctly deliver one of four health intervention packages following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire.
0 months, mid-point of the study (12 months) and at study completion (24 months)
The number of health centre staff that can correctly perform RDTs following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire
Time Frame: Approximately 18-24 months
The number of health centre staff that can correctly perform RDTs following a directly observed practical assessment and questionnaire
Approximately 18-24 months
The overall consensus of stakeholders on the use of novel RDTs following stakeholder interviews and focus group discussions.
Time Frame: Approximately 18-24 months
The overall consensus of stakeholders on the use of novel RDTs following stakeholder interviews and focus group discussions.
Approximately 18-24 months
The overall consensus of stakeholders regarding these new roles following stakeholder interviews
Time Frame: At study completion (24 months)
The overall consensus of stakeholders regarding these new roles following stakeholder interviews
At study completion (24 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients appropriately referred for further care
Time Frame: Approximately 18-24 months
The number of patients appropriately referred for further care
Approximately 18-24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas J Peto, Dr., Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
  • Principal Investigator: James J Callery, Dr., Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data collected for this study will be under the custodianship of MORU. With participant's consent, data from this study may be shared in a de-identified form with other groups or researchers in accordance with the MORU Data Sharing Policy.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of trial activities and reporting

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

MORU Data Sharing Policy. (http://www.tropmedres.ac/data-sharing-policy)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Febrile Illness

3
Subscribe