- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05055401
Airway Management Skills Amongst Anesthesia Providers
May 29, 2026 updated by: Prisma Health-Upstate
The Proficiency and Efficiency of Airway Management Skills Amongst Anesthesia Providers: A Multicenter Baseline Assessment
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and proficiency of three common airway management techniques amongst among anesthesia providers who maintain airway management privileges in our health system.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Airway management may take place in a variety of settings with varying degrees of urgency, ranging from performance for elective operative procedures to life-threatening emergencies.
An appropriate psychomotor skill set is needed to perform the procedures utilized for airway management, and the time required to do so may impact patient outcomes.
Prolonged periods of apnea and accompanying hypoxia can lead to brain damage or death.
This research is designed to evaluate the proficiency of anesthesia providers who are responsible for practicing airway management in hospitals or health systems in the United States, including Anesthesiologists, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists, and Anesthesiology Assistants.
We are attempting to establish a baseline level of proficiency by quantifying the time it takes to achieve successful airway management and the number of attempts required to do so utilizing a high fidelity manikin programmed to simulate various physiological conditions.
This baseline information could then be used to manage the decisions made by hospitals or health systems related to airway management in the future, or to redefine the policies and procedures established for performing these procedures.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
62
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
- Prisma Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
All employees of the respective anesthesia departments employed by Prisma Health will be offered participation in this study including: anesthesiologists (previously completed anesthesiology residency), certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA), and anesthesia assistants (AA).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed consent is obtained from the participant
- Participants are presently employed as an anesthesiologist (previously completed an anesthesiology residency), CRNA or AA at a participating institution
- Participants have active airway management privileges with their institution
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants are not employed by their institution
- Refusal of the participant to sign a consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Crossover
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Anesthesiology providers
Group will contain anesthesiologists, CRNA and AAs.
The type of healthcare professional participating will be recorded along with the years of experience the participant has.
Each participants experience will be categorized into three ranges, 0-3 years, 3-10 years, and 10+ years of experience.
For further clarification and analysis, the healthcare professional's normal practice setting will also be recorded including inpatient, outpatient, or hybrid (inpatient and outpatient) settings.
All providers will be analyzed together.
|
The participant will perform a direct laryngoscopy on a Laerdal SimMan 3G under healthy conditions and under limited cervical range of motion.
The participant will perform LMA placement on a Laerdal SimMan 3G under healthy conditions and under full tongue edema.
The participant will perform video laryngoscopy on a Laerdal SimMan 3G under healthy conditions and under half tongue edema with pharyngeal obstruction.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Attempts to Achieve Successful Airway Management
Time Frame: Immediate Post-Procedure
|
A successful attempt for any of the three procedures will be documented when a participant attaches a bag/valve and attempts a ventilation resulting in the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide (which will be displayed when the device is properly placed).
Failed attempts for any of the three procedures will be documented when a participant attaches a bag/valve device and attempts ventilation for purposes of confirming the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide (which will not be displayed if the device is improperly placed).
Three sequential failed attempts will result in a failure to achieve successful airway management.
|
Immediate Post-Procedure
|
|
Time Required to Achieve Successful Airway Management
Time Frame: Immediate Post-Procedure
|
Time will be measured manually via stopwatch.
Time measurement for all three procedures will begin when the participant picks up the laryngoscope, video laryngoscope, or LMA having signaled his/her intention to begin the procedure.
Time measurement will end upon detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide by the mannikin as evidenced on a standard patient monitor connected to the mannikin for this purpose.
Time measurement will continue during failed attempts and subsequent efforts to successfully perform the procedure.
Time measurement will be stopped upon successful end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement, three sequential failed attempts to perform a procedure, or after a total of five minutes have passed.
|
Immediate Post-Procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert R. Morgan, MD, Prisma Health-Upstate
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, Sakles JC. Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
- Joffe AM, Aziz MF, Posner KL, Duggan LV, Mincer SL, Domino KB. Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: A Closed Claims Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2019 Oct;131(4):818-829. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002815.
- Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO, Cook DA. Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):169-78. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829a721f.
- Russell T, Khan S, Elman J, Katznelson R, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):626-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07087.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
- Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Sep 1;119(3):369-383. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex228.
- Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope(R) video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9620-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
- Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Theriault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Mar;106(3):935-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161769e.
- Ambrosio A, Pfannenstiel T, Bach K, Cornelissen C, Gaconnet C, Brigger MT. Difficult airway management for novice physicians: a randomized trial comparing direct and video-assisted laryngoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):775-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521380. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
- Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya DK. A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Jun;47:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
- Bucx MJ, van Geel RT, Wegener JT, Robers C, Stijnen T. Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Feb;42(2):144-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03028268.
- Carlson JN, Crofts J, Walls RM, Brown CA 3rd. Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Intubating Adult Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding. West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1052-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.28045. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
- Cortellazzi P, Caldiroli D, Byrne A, Sommariva A, Orena EF, Tramacere I. Defining and developing expertise in tracheal intubation using a GlideScope((R)) for anaesthetists with expertise in Macintosh direct laryngoscopy: an in-vivo longitudinal study. Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):290-5. doi: 10.1111/anae.12878. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- Deutsch ES, Christenson T, Curry J, Hossain J, Zur K, Jacobs I. Multimodality education for airway endoscopy skill development. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009 Feb;118(2):81-6. doi: 10.1177/000348940911800201.
- Grundgeiger T, Roewer N, Grundgeiger J, Hurtienne J, Happel O. Body posture during simulated tracheal intubation: GlideScope((R)) videolaryngoscopy vs Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for novices and experts. Anaesthesia. 2015 Dec;70(12):1375-81. doi: 10.1111/anae.13190. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
- Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Harle CC, Hoogstra J, Turkstra TP. A comparison of glidescope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):144-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d15c9.
- Liu L, Tanigawa K, Kusunoki S, Tamura T, Ota K, Yamaga S, Kida Y, Otani T, Sadamori T, Takeda T, Iwasaki Y, Hirohashi N. Tracheal intubation of a difficult airway using Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1049-55. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d2aad7.
- Liu TT, Li L, Wan L, Zhang CH, Yao WL. Videolaryngoscopy vs. Macintosh laryngoscopy for double-lumen tube intubation in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018 Aug;73(8):997-1007. doi: 10.1111/anae.14226. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
- Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S. 3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):42-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201c415.
- Pieters BMA, Maas EHA, Knape JTA, van Zundert AAJ. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2017 Dec;72(12):1532-1541. doi: 10.1111/anae.14057. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
- Pieters BM, Wilbers NE, Huijzer M, Winkens B, van Zundert AA. Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel. Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):556-64. doi: 10.1111/anae.13413. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
- Pieters B, Maassen R, Van Eig E, Maathuis B, Van Den Dobbelsteen J, Van Zundert A. Indirect videolaryngoscopy using Macintosh blades in patients with non-anticipated difficult airways results in significantly lower forces exerted on teeth relative to classic direct laryngoscopy: a randomized crossover trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Aug;81(8):846-54. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
- Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, Snowden B, Glickman LT, Hendey GW. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):866-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00492.x. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
- Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth. 2012 Nov;24(7):593-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.005.
- Sakles JC, Mosier J, Patanwala AE, Dicken J. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope(R) video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):930-7. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.23691. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
- Waddington MS, Paech MJ, Kurowski IH, Reed CJ, Nicholls GJ, Guy DT, Day RE. The influence of gender and experience on intubation ability and technique: a manikin study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Sep;37(5):791-801. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700502.
- Wetsch WA, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Carlitscheck M, Padosch SA, Lier H, Bottiger BW, Hinkelbein J. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):740-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 22, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 13, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
November 13, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 14, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
September 24, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 2, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 29, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00104249
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Management
-
Bursa City HospitalEmre ULUSOYNot yet recruitingAirway Management | Difficult AirwayTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Royal Hospital, OmanNot yet recruitingDifficult Airway | Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Difficult Airway IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
NHS TaysideTerminated
-
Akdeniz University HospitalCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Obstetric AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Thomas RivaThe Hospital for Sick Children; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Charite... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAirway ManagementUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Canada, Germany, Brazil
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruiting
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Direct Laryngoscopy
-
Tunis UniversityRecruitingThe Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each TechniqueTunisia
-
Universidad de AntioquiaIPS Universitaria-Universidad de AntioquiaCompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway TraumaColombia
-
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center...UnknownIntubation, IntratrachealUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterNot yet recruitingSurfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)United States
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruiting
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansCompleted
-
University College DublinLeiden University Medical Center; National Maternity Hospital, IrelandRecruitingIntubation | Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Infant, Newborn | Intubation Complications | Video LaryngoscopyNorway, Poland, Czechia, Italy, Spain, Greece, Croatia, Romania, Ukraine, Hungary
-
Sir Ganga Ram HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
IWK Health CentreCompleted