Video- Or Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Newborns (VODE)

November 20, 2023 updated by: University College Dublin

A Randomised Trial of Videolaryngoscopy Or Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Newborn Infants

Endotracheal intubation is a critical intervention for newborn babies. Laryngoscopy is the crucial part of endotracheal intubation. Traditionally, operators use a standard laryngoscope to view the larynx by looking directly into the mouth (direct laryngoscopy). More recently videolaryngoscopes that have a video camera mounted at the tip of the laryngoscope blade have been developed, Rather than look directly into the mouth, the operator looks at a screen that displays the view acquired by the camera (indirect laryngoscopy). Videolaryngoscopes have been demonstrated to be useful for teaching trainees direct laryngoscopy. However, it may be that all clinicians are more successful with a videolaryngoscope. The investigators will compare whether clinicians who are randomly assigned to intubate newborn infants using a videolaryngoscope are more successful in intubating newborn infants at the first attempt compared to clinicians who are randomly assigned to intubate newborn infants using a standard laryngoscope.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endotracheal intubation is a critical intervention for newborn babies. Proficiency at intubation has declined markedly in recent decades such that fewer than half of babies are successfully intubated at the first attempt. Laryngoscopy is the crucial part of endotracheal intubation. Traditionally, operators use a standard laryngoscope to view the larynx by looking directly into the mouth (direct laryngoscopy). More recently videolaryngoscopes that have a video camera mounted at the tip of the laryngoscope blade have been developed, Rather than look directly into the mouth, the operator looks at a screen that displays the view acquired by the camera (indirect laryngoscopy). Videolaryngoscopes have been demonstrated to be useful for teaching trainees direct laryngoscopy, i.e. a senior colleague can coach them during the procedure. However, it may be that all clinicians are more successful with a videolaryngoscope. We will compare whether clinicians who are randomly assigned to intubate newborn infants using a videolaryngoscope are more successful in intubating newborn infants at the first attempt compared to clinicians who are randomly assigned to intubate newborn infants using a standard laryngoscope.

The investigators will study newborn infants who are undergoing intubation at the discretion of their treating clinicians in delivery room or in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).Term and preterm infants of any gender will be eligible to participate. Babies with upper airway anomalies will be ineligible. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to "VIDEO" or ""STANDARD" group. Intubation success will be determined in both groups using an exhaled carbon dioxide detector or flow sensor. Caregivers and outcome assessors will not be masked to group assignment. The investigators will enrol 214 babies to the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

214

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Co. Dublin
      • Dublin, Co. Dublin, Ireland, D02 YH21
        • National Maternity Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 4 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborn infants (term and preterm, of any gender) in whom endotracheal intubation is attempted in the course of their clinical care in the Delivery Room or Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with upper airway anomalies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Videolaryngoscope
Intubation attempted with C-MAC videolaryngoscope
Indirect laryngoscopy using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope
Active Comparator: Standard laryngoscope
Intubation attempted with standard laryngoscope
Direct laryngoscopy with a standard laryngoscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intubation success at first attempt
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Endotracheal intubation at first attempt confirmed with an exhaled carbon dioxide detector or flow sensor
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lowest SpO2 during first intubation attempt
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Lowest oxygen saturation recorded during first intubation attempt
5 minutes
Lowest HR during first intubation attempt
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Lowest heart rate during first intubation during first intubation attempt
5 minutes
Number of attempts taken to intubate successfully
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Number of attempts taken to successfully intubate the infant
30 minutes
Duration of successful attempt
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Interval measured in seconds from the introduction of the laryngosocpe blade into the infants mouth to its removal in the successful intubation attempt
30 minutes
Crossover to alternative device
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Use of alternative non-assigned laryngosocpe to attempt intubation
30 minutes
Correct ETT tip position on CXR
Time Frame: 1 hour
Correct endotracheal tube tip position (i.e. between upper border of first thoracic vertebra and lower border of second thoracic vertebra) on chest radiograph
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VODE01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Reasonable requests to share IPD will be considered

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation, Intratracheal

Clinical Trials on Videolaryngoscopy

3
Subscribe