Post-Revascularization Optimization and PHysiological Evaluation of intermediaTe Lesions (PROPHET-FFR)

August 29, 2023 updated by: Antonio Maria Leone, MD, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Post-Revascularization Optimization and PHysiological Evaluation of intermediaTe Lesions: an FFR-based Single Center Registry

PROPHET-FFR is a single center ambispective registry aiming to explore the impact of post-revascularization functional assessment on later outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PROPHET-FFR is a ambispective observational study enrolling patients that need invasive functional evaluation in the diagnostic workup of coronary artery disease.

Clinical outcomes of patients that undergo functional assessment after PCI will be compared both to patients undergoing PCI without further evaluations and both to patients that will be deferred due to to negative functional evaluation.

Since the observational nature of the study the decision to perform post-PCI physiological assessment will be left to operator's discretion.

In case of post-PCI functional evaluation results that will be deemed as unsatisfactory by the operator further actions can be taken in order to optimize procedural result. The decision on this opportunity as well as the choice of the strategy to adopt are left to operator's discretion.

The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of MACE defined as the composite of spontaneous MI, target vessel failure, cardiac deaths at 24 months. Follow up will be performed by telephone contact and medical records screening at 12, 24 and 36 months.

Moreover data about in-hospital events will be collected including the release of myocardial damage markers, change in Creatinine, and lenght of hospital stay.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients requiring invasive functional evaluation of epicardial stenosis to guide revascularization.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • requiring coronary angiography to assess coronary artery disease;
  • having at least one angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis (eg. 40%-80%) on any vessel requiring invasive functional assessment using FFR (and/or any other surrogate index)
  • being able and legally entitled to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of severe poorly uncontrolled pulmonary disease
  • hemodynamic instability during the diagnostic or therapeutic procedures;
  • known adenosine intolerance
  • need of mechanical circulatory or ventilatory support;
  • stage IV chronic kidney disease.
  • life expectancy <1 year
  • patients gaining indication to surgical revascularization;
  • major procedural complications during percutaneous revascularization (cardiac arrest needing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, major bleeding , large iatrogenic coronary dissection, coronary embolization in a main vessel, suspected stroke) making post-PCI functional evaluation unsafe or impossible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group 1
Patients with negative invasive functional evaluation
Enrolled patients will undergo invasive functional evaluation of coronary stenosis followed by percutaneous revascularization if appropriate. Patients in Group 3 will have target lesion re-assessed using either PdPa, FFR, iFR or contrast FFR.
Group 2
Patients with positive invasive functional evaluation undergoing PCI
Enrolled patients will undergo invasive functional evaluation of coronary stenosis followed by percutaneous revascularization if appropriate. Patients in Group 3 will have target lesion re-assessed using either PdPa, FFR, iFR or contrast FFR.
Group 3
Patients with positive invasive functional evaluation undergoing PCI and subsequent retest of functional indexes
Enrolled patients will undergo invasive functional evaluation of coronary stenosis followed by percutaneous revascularization if appropriate. Patients in Group 3 will have target lesion re-assessed using either PdPa, FFR, iFR or contrast FFR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of composite of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) [ Cardiac Death/Myocardial Infarction/Target Vessel Failure (TVF)]
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of any component of MACE (Cardiac Death/Myocardial Infarction/Target Vessel Failure (TVF)]
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Rate of all-cause Death
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Rate of recurrent or persistent angina
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Percentage of change in angina intensity assessed by shortened Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
A score ranging from 0 to 100, with the higher values associated with less severe symptoms
1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Rate of cardiac hospitalizations
Time Frame: 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Any hospitalization for cardiac causes
1 year, 3 years, 5 years
absolute and relative change in functional indexes measured before and after any step of the study procedure
Time Frame: intraprocedural
intraprocedural
post-procedural troponin level
Time Frame: 24 hours and 48 hours
ng/L
24 hours and 48 hours
post-procedural creatinine level
Time Frame: 24 hours and 48 hours
mg/dL
24 hours and 48 hours
procedural cost
Time Frame: intraprocedural
Euro
intraprocedural
fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: intraprocedural
minutes
intraprocedural
contrast dose
Time Frame: intraprocedural
mL
intraprocedural
number of stents implanted and balloon used for optimization
Time Frame: intraprocedural
intraprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 4, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on Invasive functional evaluation with either Pd/Pa, FFR, iFR or contrast FFR

Subscribe