A Study to Test the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women With Osteoporosis

November 8, 2024 updated by: UCB Biopharma SRL

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women With Osteoporosis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 6 months compared with placebo on the percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, at the total hip and femoral neck in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

327

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20040
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20115
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20125
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20127
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20128
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20130
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20131
      • Beijing, China
        • Op0002 20157
      • Chengdu, China
        • Op0002 20021
      • Chengdu, China
        • Op0002 20133
      • Chengdu, China
        • Op0002 20137
      • Foshan, China
        • Op0002 20205
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Op0002 20117
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Op0002 20124
      • Nanchang, China
        • Op0002 20209
      • Nanjing, China
        • Op0002 20135
      • Pingxiang, China
        • Op0002 20202
      • Rui'an, China
        • Op0002 20199
      • Shanghai, China
        • Op0002 20116
      • Shanghai, China
        • Op0002 20118
      • Shanghai, China
        • Op0002 20121
      • Shanghai, China
        • Op0002 20123
      • Shanghai, China
        • Op0002 20129
      • Suzhou, China
        • Op0002 20119
      • Suzhou, China
        • Op0002 20204
      • Tianjin, China
        • Op0002 20122
      • Tianjin, China
        • Op0002 20136
      • Wuhan, China
        • Op0002 20120
      • Yueyang, China
        • Op0002 20134
      • Zhengzhou, China
        • Op0002 20132

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

51 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol, visit schedule, and medication intake according to the judgment of the investigator
  • Subject is an ambulatory postmenopausal Chinese women, 55 to 90 years of age (inclusive) at the time of Screening. Postmenopause is defined as no spontaneous vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 or more consecutive months prior to Screening
  • Subject has a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤-2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES, 1998)
  • Subject must have at least 1 of following independent risk factors for fracture:

    • History of fragility fracture (except hip fracture, a severe vertebral fracture or more than 2 moderate vertebral fractures)
    • Parental history of hip fracture
    • Low body weight (body mass index ≤19kg/m2)
    • Elderly (age ≥ 65 years)
    • Current smoker
  • Subject has at least 2 vertebrae in the L1 to L4 region and at least 1 hip that are evaluable by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), as assessed by the central imaging vendor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a BMD T-score of ≤-3.50 at the total hip or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from NHANES 1998
  • Subject has a known history of hip fracture
  • Subject has any severe (SQ3) or more than 2 moderate (SQ2) vertebral fractures, as assessed by the central imaging vendor based on the lateral spine x-ray at Screening
  • Subject has a history of myocardial infarction (MI)
  • Subject has a history of stroke
  • Subject has a vitamin D insufficiency, defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D levels <20 ng/mL, as assessed by the central laboratory at Screening. Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and the subject may be retested once within the Screening Period
  • Subject has used oral bisphosphonates:

    • Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
    • More than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization
    • More than 3 years of cumulative use, unless the last dose was received ≥5 years prior to randomization
  • Subject has used intravenous (iv) bisphosphonates:

    • zoledronic acid

      • Any doses received within 3 years prior to randomization
      • More than 1 dose received within 5 years prior to randomization
    • iv ibandronate, iv pamidronate, or iv alendronate (ALN)

      • Any doses received within 12 months prior to randomization
      • More than 3 years of cumulative use, unless the last dose was received ≥5 years prior to randomization
  • Subject has used denosumab or any cathepsin K inhibitor:

    ● Any doses received within 18 months prior to randomization

  • Subject has used tibolone, cinacalcet, or calcitonin:

    • Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
  • Subject has used teriparatide (TPTD) or any parathyroid hormone (PTH) derivative:

    • Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
    • More than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization
  • Subject has used systemic oral or transdermal estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs):

    ● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 6 months prior to randomization

  • Subject has used strontium ranelate or fluoride:

    ● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 5 years prior to randomization

  • Subject has used hormonal ablation therapy:

    ● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 6 months prior to randomization

  • Subject has used systemic glucocorticosteroids:

    ● ≥5mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 14 days within 3 months prior to randomization

  • Subject has a history of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) or atypical femoral fracture (AFF)
  • Subject has evidence of any of the following:

    1. Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism is defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) outside of the normal range. Uncontrolled hypothyroidism is defined as TSH >10
    2. Current, uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism or history of hypoparathyroidism. Uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism is defined as PTH outside the normal range in subjects with concurrent hypercalcemia or PTH values >20 % above upper limit of normal (ULN) in normocalcemic subjects
    3. Current hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia, defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium outside the normal range, as assessed by the central laboratory at the time of Screening. Albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels may be retested once in case of an elevated albumin-adjusted serum calcium level within 1.1xULN of the laboratory's reference ranges
    4. Subject has ≥3xULN of any of the following: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or >ULN total bilirubin (≥1.5xULN total bilirubin if known Gilbert's syndrome). If subject has elevations only in total bilirubin that are >ULN and <1.5xULN, fractionate bilirubin to identify possible undiagnosed Gilbert's syndrome (ie, direct bilirubin <35 %)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Romosozumab
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive romosozumab during all treatment Periods.
Subjects will receive romosozumab in a specified sequence during the treatment Period.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind-Placebo controlled Period and romosozumab during the Open-Label treatment Period
Subjects will receive romosozumab in a specified sequence during the treatment Period.
Subjects will receive Placebo in a specified sequence during the treatment Period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine to the End of Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. LSM = least square mean.
From Baseline (Day 1) to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a IMP, whether or not related to the IMP. TEAEs are defined as all AEs started on or worsened in severity on or after the date of receiving first dose of IMP and before or on the end of study (EOS) date.
From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events for Romosozumab During Overall Period
Time Frame: From Month 7 up to Month 12 (Placebo/Romo) and From Day 1 up to Month 12 (Romo/Romo) + 3-month SFU (up to Month 15)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a IMP, whether or not related to IMP. TEAEs are defined as all AEs started on or worsened in severity on or after date of receiving first dose of IMP and before or on EOS date except lipid-type AEs starting on date of first dose of IMP and not worsening (and not deemed IMP related by the investigator). As pre-specified in Protocol and SAP, TEAEs were assessed and reported for 6 months for participants in placebo/romosozumab arm (Open-label Period) and for a total of 12 months for participants in romosozumab/romosozumab arm (Double-blind Period + Open-label Period combined) + 3 months of Safety follow-up for both arms (Up to Month 15) during overall period.
From Month 7 up to Month 12 (Placebo/Romo) and From Day 1 up to Month 12 (Romo/Romo) + 3-month SFU (up to Month 15)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip to the End of Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach.
From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck to the End of the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach.
From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. For Placebo/Romosozumab Treatment group, only the post Month 6 value was used for imputation for Open-label Period, the values in the Double-blind Period were not carried forward into the Open-label Period.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. For Placebo/Romosozumab Treatment group, only the post Month 6 value was used for imputation for Open-label Period, the values in the Double-blind Period were not carried forward into the Open-label Period.
Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. For Placebo/Romosozumab Treatment group, only the post Month 6 value was used for imputation for Open-label Period, the values in the Double-blind Period were not carried forward into the Open-label Period.
Baseline, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Cares, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Romosozumab

Subscribe