Safety and Efficacy of Plasma Transfusion From Exercise-trained Donors in Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease (ExPlas)

Safety and Efficacy of Plasma Transfusion From Exercise-trained Donors in Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease: The ExPlas Study

Introduction Given that exercise training reduces the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD), induces changes in the blood composition and has widespread systemic benefits, it is reasonable to hypothesize that exercised plasma may have rejuvenative properties. The main objective is to test safety and tolerability of transfusing exercised plasma (ExPlas) from young, healthy, fit adults to patients with early AD. The study is a pilot for a future efficacy study. The key secondary objectives are examining the effect of plasma transfusions on cognitive function, fitness level, vascular risk profile, assessment of cerebral blood flow and hippocampal volume, quality of life, functional connectivity assessed by resting state functional MRI and biomarkers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid.

Methods and analysis ExPlas is a double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical single center trial. Patients aged 50-75 years with diagnosis mild cognitive impairment or early AD will be recruited from two Norwegian hospitals. ExPlas is plasma drawn by plasmapheresis once a month for 4 months, from a total of 30 donors (aged 18-40, BMI ≤27 kg/m2 and VO2max >50 mL/kg/min). All units will be virus inactivated by the Intercept method in accordance with procedures at St. Olavs Hospital. Comparison with isotonic saline allows differentiation from a non-blood product. The main study consists of 6 rounds of examinations in addition to 12 plasma transfusions divided over three 4-weeks periods during study year-1. Follow-up examinations after 2 and 5 years after baseline is also planned.

Ethics and dissemination Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and participation is voluntary. All participants have a next of kin who will follow them throughout the study and represent the patient's interest. The study is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK 2018/702) and the Norwegian Medicines Agency (EudraCT No. 2018-000148-24).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Trondheim, Norway
        • Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St Olavs Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • Diagnosis AD in early phase according to the IWG-2 criteria.
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score ≥20.
  • In-vivo evidence of Alzheimer´s pathology (one of the following):

    • Decreased Aβ42 together with increased t-tau or p-tau in CSF.
    • Increased tracer retention on amyloid PET.
  • Availability of a next of kin who knows the patient well and is willing to accompany the subject to all trial visits and give information about the patients functional level.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • The patient is judged fitted for the study and capable to cooperate in treatment and follow-up.
  • Ability to communicate in Norwegian or another Scandinavian language.

Patient exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy or unwilling to use adequate birth control for the duration of and 6 months beyond study participation. Defined according to Clinical Trial Facilitation Group document "Recommendations related to contraception and pregnancy testing in clinical trials".
  • Positive for Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or HIV at screening.
  • Not qualified to give consent at inclusion.
  • Any other condition judged to interfere with the safety of the patient or the intent and conduct of the study.

Related to medical history:

  • Stroke
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Prior adverse reaction to any human blood product
  • Any history of a blood coagulation disorder or hypercoagulability
  • Congestive heart failure, defined as any previous heart failure hospitalization, or current symptomatic heart failure in New York heart Association class ≥II with reduced, mid-range or preserved ejection fraction.
  • Coagulation defect or hypercoagulopathy
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Renal failure
  • Prior intolerance to intravenous fluids
  • Recent history of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation
  • Bone marrow transplant
  • IgA deficiency
  • Severe protein S deficiency
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 40 x 10 to the power of 9/L)
  • Contraindication for Octaplasma

Related to medications or other treatments:

  • Any concurrent use of anticoagulant therapy, clopidogrel or acetylsalicylic acid/Dipyridamol in combination.
  • Initiation or change in the dosage of a acetylcholine esterase inhibitor (AChEI) or memantine during the trial (week 0-52). Participants will be urged to start on AChEI when diagnosis is communicated, and must be on a stable dose for at least one month prior to screening.
  • Concurrent participation in another treatment trial for AD. If there was prior participation, the last dose of the investigational agent must have been given at least 6 months prior to screening, except if the patient received placebo medication.
  • Treatment with any human blood product, including intravenous immunoglobulin, during the 6 months prior to screening or during the trial.
  • Concurrent daily treatment with benzodiazepines, typical or atypical antipsychotics, long-acting opioids, or other medications that is judged to interfere with cognition. Intermittent treatment with short-acting benzodiazepines or atypical antipsychotics may be permitted, provided that no dose is administered within 72 hours prior to cognitive assessment.

Related to magnetic resonance imaging:

  • Claustrophobia
  • Any metallic surgical implant, like a pacemaker or clip that is incompatible with MRI.

Certain metallic implants like joint replacements may be permitted, provided that specific manufacturer specifications are available, and that the device is known to be safe for 7T MRI. In case a patient is not eligible for the 7T scanner, the 3T scanner will be used.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercised plasma (ExPlas)
Dosage: 200 mL at every time point Dosage form: Solution for intravenous infusion Frequency of administration: 12 ExPlas transfusions during the time span of one year (weekly transfusions in 3 four-week periods)

ExPlas (plasma from fit donors) is a Investigational Medicinal Product. ExPlas is plasma drawn by plasmapheresis once a month for 4 months, from a total of 30 donors (aged 18-40, BMI ≤27 kg/m2 and VO2max >50 mL/kg/min) at the Blood Bank at St. Olavs Hospital. All unites will be virus inactivated by the Intercept method (Cerus corporation, US) in accordance with the procedures at Blood Bank at St. Olavs Hospital.

The transfusion volume will be 200 mL at every time point.

The main study consists of 6 rounds of examinations in addition to 12 plasma transfusions during the time span of one year (weekly transfusions in 3 four-week periods) and one round of examinations 2 years after baseline. A follow-up visit is also planned 5 years after baseline.

Active Comparator: Octaplasma
Dosage: 200 mL at every time point Dosage form: Solution for intravenous infusion Frequency of administration: 12 Octaplasma transfusions during the time span of one year (weekly transfusions in 3 four-week periods)

Octaplasma is defined as a Investigational Medicinal Product. Octaplasma is human pooled plasma produced by Octapharma (Lachen, Switzerland). The transfusion volume will be 200 mL at every time point .

The main study consists of 6 rounds of examinations in addition to 12 plasma transfusions during the time span of one year (weekly transfusions in 3 four-week periods) and one round of examinations 2 years after baseline. A follow-up visit is also planned 5 years after baseline.

Placebo Comparator: Saline
Dosage: 200 mL at every time point Dosage form: Solution for intravenous infusion Frequency of administration: 12 saline infusions during the time span of one year (weekly transfusions in 3 four-week periods)

Saline is provided by the hospital pharmacies in Central Norway. The infusion volume will be 200 mL at every time point.

The main study consists of 6 rounds of examinations in addition to 12 saline infusions during the time span of one year (weekly transfusions in 3 four-week periods) and one round of examinations 2 years after baseline. A follow-up visit is also planned 5 years after baseline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
as a measure for safety and tolerability of the treatment
1 year
Number of subjects who comply with the research protocol
Time Frame: 1 year
as a measure for feasibility
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CERAD-test
Time Frame: 1, 2 and 5 years
Change in performance in the CERAD (The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) Ten word Test. CERAD Word List consists of three test parts; immediate recall, delayed recall and recognition. The scoring range for immediate recall is 0-30, for delayed recall 0-10 and for recognition 0-20. Higher scores indicate better learning performance, memory performance and recognition performance.
1, 2 and 5 years
MMSE
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in the Mini-Mental State Examination Score. An MMSE score of ≥20 is criteria for inclusion. Higher scores >28 indicate normal cognitive function. Scores in the middle range 25-27 may indicate cognitive impairment. Lower scores <24 indicate cognitive impairment.
1, 2, and 5 years
Trail-Making test A and B
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in performance in Trail-Making test A and B. The Trail Making Tests are scored by how long it takes to complete the tests. Norms for completion time variate with age and educational level. Longer completion time indicates impaired visual attention, processing speed and executive function.
1, 2, and 5 years
Clock Drawing Test
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in scores in the Clock Drawing Test. The Clock Drawing Test has a scoring range 0-5. Higher scores indicate normal cognitive function. Lower scores <4 may indicate cognitive impairment, spatial dysfunction or neglect.
1, 2, and 5 years
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)-FAS
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in scores in Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)-FAS. Scoring is based on how many words the person produces within 1 minute. The minimum score is 0, and there is no maximum score. Higher scores indicate better verbal fluency. Scoring norms are based on the persons age and education level.
1, 2, and 5 years
Visual Object and Space Perception (VOSP) Silhouettes
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in scores in Visual Object and Space Perception (VOSP) Silhouettes. Visual Object and Space Perception (VOSP) Silhouettes has a scoring range 0-30. Higher scores > 20 indicate normal visuospatial function, and lower scores < 20 indicate visuospatial dysfunction.
1, 2, and 5 years
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Global score and Sum of Boxes
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Global score and Sum of Boxes. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) is a clinical scale for the staging of dementia. The Global Score ranges dementia severity from 0-3. The Sum of Boxes ranges dementia severity from 0-18. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.
1, 2, and 5 years
The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL). The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) evaluates the person's ability to perform complex everyday activities. The score ranges from 8-31. Higher scores indicate lower functional level.
1, 2, and 5 years
6 minutes' walk test
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in 6 minutes' walk-test
1, 2, and 5 years
Functional MRI
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in/Reduced hippocampal atrophy and preservation of functional connectivity assessed by resting state functional MRI. A secondary aim is to identify any effect of treatment group on MRI markers of both neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disease.
1, 2, and 5 years
SF-36
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Quality of Life SF-36 Questionnaire. Computer-based scoring services for the SF-36v2 are available through QualityMetric™ or its licensed certified vendors.
1, 2, and 5 years
Biomarker profile in blood
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in biomarkers in blood (APOE). As there exist no single ideal biomarker of AD this endpoint is partly exploratory. Biological material will be stored for future analysis in the search for new biomarkers.
1, 2, and 5 years
Biomarker profile in cerebrospinal fluid
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Change in biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (Amyloid Beta 1-42, Amyloid Beta 1-40, phosphor tau and total tau). As there exist no single ideal biomarker of AD this endpoint is partly exploratory. Biological material will be stored for future analysis in the search for new biomarkers.
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Cardiac dimensions - Left ventricular end diastolic diameter
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in cardiac dimensions - left ventricular end diastolic diameter (mm).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Cardiac dimensions - Right ventricular dimension
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in cardiac dimensions - right ventricular dimension (mm).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Cardiac volumes - Left ventricular and diastolic volume.
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in cardiac volumes - left ventricular and diastolic volume (mL).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Cardiac volumes - Right ventricular volume
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in cardiac volumes. Right ventricular volume (mL).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Functional indices - Ejection fraction
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in functional indices - ejection fraction (%).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Functional indices - Left ventricular strain
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in functional indices - left ventricular strain (%).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Functional indices - Ventricular velocity
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in functional indices - ventricular velocity (cm/s).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Functional indices - Right ventricular strain
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in functional indices - right ventricular strain (%).
1, 2, and 5 years
Echocardiography - Functional indices - Left ventricular stiffness
Time Frame: 1, 2, and 5 years
Changes in functional indices - left ventricular stiffness.
1, 2, and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ulrik Wisløff, PhD, Prof, Cardiac Exercise Research Group at the Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU
  • Principal Investigator: Sigrid Botne Sando, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

To be decided

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Collaborative research projects

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Subscribe