Evaluation of the Use of Machine Learning Techniques to Classify Neurodegenerative PARKinsonian Syndromes (Artificial Intelligence) (PARKIA)

November 28, 2023 updated by: Antoine VERGER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) relies mainly on clinical observation of the patient, looking for the three characteristic symptoms and sometimes remains a real challenge. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms could help to diagnose PD early and differentiate idiopathic PD from atypical Parkinsonian syndromes.

In this context, the work of Castillo-Barnes' team provided a set of imaging features based on morphological characteristics extracted from DaTSCAN® or Ioflupane (iodine-123-labeled radiopharmaceutical) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans to discern healthy participants from participants with Parkinson's disease in a balanced set of SPECTs from the "Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative" (PPMI) data base.

The team of a study evaluated the classification performance of Parkinson's patients and normal controls when semi-quantitative indicators and shape features obtained on the dopamine transporter (DAT) by Ioflupane (123I-IP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are combined as a machine learning (ML) feature.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) based methods can improve diagnostic assessments. Several dopaminergic imaging studies using Artificial have reported accuracy of up to 90% for the diagnosis of PD.

These automated approaches use machine learning methods, based on textural analyses, to (i) differentiate PD and healthy subjects, (ii) differentiate PD and vascular parkinsonism, and (iii) distinguish between different forms of atypical parkinsonism.

A study conducted in 2 centers using a linear support vector machine (SVM) model discriminated patients with PD and healthy subjects with an accuracy of 82.5%.This performance is similar to visual assessment by nuclear physicians A linear SVM model based on voxel values of statistical parametric images was able to differentiate PD from vascular parkinsonism with an accuracy of 90.4%. The Nancy team has extensive experience in the detection of PD in SPECT and SPECT/CT scans with Ioflupane or DaTSCAN™

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1664

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandoeuvre les Nancy cedex, France, 54511
        • Nuclear medicine department CHRU de NANCY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All Patients who performed a DaTSCAN SPECT scan in the nuclear medicine department of the Nancy CHRU between 21/11/2011 and 01/09/2017.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who performed a DaTSCAN SPECT scan in the nuclear medicine department of the Nancy CHRU between 21/11/2011 and 01/09/2017.
  • Reviews that took place between 11/21/2011 and 9/1/2017 were repatriated from PACS to the processing consoles.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
All patients underwent DaTSCAN SPECT scans

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of the algorithm
Time Frame: 2 months
Accuracy of the algorithm implemented for the new data in terms of predicting the type of atypical parkinsonian syndrome.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of two networks
Time Frame: 2 months
Comparison of the performance of the semi-supervised network with the supervised network, to recognize the importance of unlabeled data in learning
2 months
Analyze the robustness of the network
Time Frame: 2 months
Analyze the robustness of the network to different data (data from different gamma camera models)
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on DaTSCAN SPECT Scans

3
Subscribe