The Optimization and Evaluation of the Extremism and Intolerance Curriculum for the Kingdom of Bahrain.

November 2, 2022 updated by: Jeffrey Milroy, University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Researcher from UNC Greensboro have partnered with Prevention Strategies and key stakeholders from the Kingdom of Bahrain to conduct a study using the innovative, engineering-inspired methodological approach, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), to optimize and evaluate the Peaceful Coexistence and Anti-Extremism middle and high school curricula. No other curriculum targeting tolerance and/or extremism has been optimized using the state-of-the-art MOST methodology. The overall goal of the project is that the optimized versions of Peaceful Coexistence and Anti-Extremism curricula will be used across the Kingdom of Bahrain and translated for use in other countries to combat the spread of extremism and intolerance. Additionally, the D.A.R.E. keepin' it REAL (kiR) and D.A.R.E. myPlaybook high school programs will be evaluated as part of the Peaceful Coexistence and Anti-Extremism evaluation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
        • Recruiting
        • UNC Greensboro
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Public or private Bahraini middle or high school students.
  • In addition to the main evaluation questions, the following groups will also be included to make programmatic improvements.
  • Parents of above mentioned middle or high school students.
  • D.A.R.E. Officers teaching middle school and high school D.A.R.E. in Bahrain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Classrooms assigned to the intervention group will receive the Peaceful Coexistence (middle school) or Anti-extremism (high school) curricula.

The Peaceful Coexistence intervention seeks to target important risk and protective factors related to tolerance and acceptance.

The Anti-Extremism intervention seeks to take the same risk and protective factors covered in the Peaceful Coexistence intervention and have students' psychosocial factors shift their skills and behavior.

Other Names:
  • Anti-Extremism
No Intervention: No intervention
Classrooms assigned to the No intervention group will receive general information during their sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Norms about intolerance
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Participant's mean rating of norms related to intolerance of others measured by the intolerance norms scale.
immediately post intervention
Dignity
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of dignity reported by participants measured by the Jacelon Attributed Dignity Scale.
immediately post intervention
Plurality
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of religious plurality reported by participants using the Religious Plurality scale.
immediately post intervention
Beliefs about consequences
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participant beliefs about consequences related to not listening to different opinions of others measured by the Beliefs about intolerance consequences scale.
immediately post intervention
Source literacy
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participants' reported source literacy measured by the Source literacy scale.
immediately post intervention
Resistance skills
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participants' reported efficacy to resist religiously, politically, or socially extreme sentiments measured by the Resistance skills scale.
immediately post intervention
Decision making
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participants' report of decision making skills measured by the Decision making skills scale.
immediately post intervention
Empathy
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participants' empathy toward people and opinions that are different from their own measured by the Emotional Quotient Scale.
immediately post intervention
Tolerance of different opinions and behaviors of others
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating pf participants' reporting of expectations of others based on tolerant behaviors measured by the Tolerance of others scale.
immediately post intervention
Open Mindedness to differing opinions
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean ratings of participants' report of open mindedness of differing political, social, and religious ideals measured by the Open Minded Cognition Scale.
immediately post intervention
Non-Violent Conflict Resolution
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participants' ideals related to non-violent conflict resolution measured by the Normative Beliefs about Aggression Scale.
immediately post intervention
Community values
Time Frame: immediately post intervention
Mean rating of participants' opinions related to their expectations of other as it pertains to extremist behaviors measured by the community values scale.
immediately post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-FY21-66

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tolerance

Clinical Trials on Peaceful Coexistence

3
Subscribe