Mechanical Thrombectomy of Medium Sized Vessels "M2 of MCA".

October 12, 2021 updated by: Mahmoud Nageeb, Assiut University

Mechanical Thrombectomy of Medium Sized Vessels "M2 of MCA" :a Clinical Trial

Mechanical thrombectomy recently has revolutionized the treatment of stroke. Trials have demonstrated the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions, such as in the intracranialinternal carotid artery and proximal, middle cerebral artery (M1), middle cerebral artery trunk (M1), have relatively high rates of revascularization and favorable clinical outcomes after MT. , However second-order branches of the middle cerebral artery (M2) occlusions (postbifurcation in the Sylvian fissure) were underrepresented or not represented in the trials. Posing a more significant technical challenge to the available endovascular devices because of the smaller size and tortuosity of these arteries and the greater likelihood of recanalization with intravenous thrombolysis, the overall risk-benefit remains uncertain.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

this study aims to:

  1. compare efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy over medical treatment in occlusion of M2 division of MCA.
  2. improve outcome of acute ischemic stroke.

The study will include all patients with AIS attending to emergency deparment with proven occlusion of M2 division of MCA, and deviding then into 2 groups:

Group 1 will receive medical treatment (rTPA if presented in the first 4 hours, and antiplatelet if passed time window for IVT) Group 2 will underwent mechanical thrombectomy (if accessible), and even after receiving medical treatment and not improved and comparing the outcomes of these 2 groups

c. Sample Size Calculation: Sample size was calculated using G*power, version 3.1.9.7. Estimation based on results of previous study which reported that, median (IQR) discharge NIHSS in mechanical thrombectomy group was 2 (0-4) compared to 1 (0-2) in medical management group giving medium effect size . With a power of 80% (using one-sided t-test, effect size = 0.65 and α of 0.5) the sample needed for the study was estimated to be 60 patients (30 in each group).

Study design:

All patients are subjected to the following: -

  • Enrolled patients were admitted to stroke units or intensive care units.
  • Intravenous t-PA was allowed if begun within < 4.5 hours after symptom onset.
  • Thrombectomy will be performed with any FDA approved thrombectomy device by the use of local anesthesia (general anesthesia will be discouraged).

Imaging

  • Patients presented with clinical picture and radiography suggestive of large vessel occlusion and who meet the proposed clinical criteria for EVT will be subjected to a comprehensive evaluation with:
  • Arterial imaging of the cerebral circulation with preferably with CTA or alternatively with magnetic resonance angiography to
  • Perfusion imaging with perfusion CT or with diffusion weighted imaging MRI can allow identification and quantification of the ischemic penumbra and, therefore, is useful for assessing patient eligibility for EVT in the extended time window.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Cerebral infarction in anterior circulation involving occlusion of M2 MCA, proven by CTA
  • With or without IV thrombolysis
  • Access to endovascular treatment within 24 hours from onset.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Proven proximal occlusion of MCA.
  2. Disability prior to the stroke (mRS >3)
  3. Opposition of the patient or their family

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Mechanical thrombectomy
this arm will include all patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy, either alone or after failure of medical treatment.
Mechanical thrombectomy is interventional method and the first line management in large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke
medical management of patient according guide lines, either alteplase if presented in it's time window, or anti-platelet
Active Comparator: medical managemnet
this arm will include all patients who received medical treatment only, either anti-platelet or alteplase.
medical management of patient according guide lines, either alteplase if presented in it's time window, or anti-platelet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical neurological outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
Clinical neurological outcome was evaluated at discharge (within one week from onset) and at 3 months by the neurologist in charge. by using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Good clinical outcome at discharge was defined as a NIHSS score less than or equal to 2 or a decrease in NIHSS score greater than or equal to 10 points.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome
Time Frame: 3 months

Functional outcome will be assessed using Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) which measures the degree of disability after stroke.

Good functional outcome was defined as mRS less than 2 that will be assessed at one and three moth at discharge.

3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute Ischemic

Clinical Trials on Mechanical thrombectomy

Subscribe