Regional Strategy for Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy (START)

December 28, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Strategy for Transfer to Emergency Head And Neck (UTEC) of Stroke Alerts With Suspicion of Large Vessel Occlusion for Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Languedoc Roussillon Region

A mono-centre observational study with the aim of compare clinical outcome at 3 month on patients admitted with recent cerebral infarct and intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation who are eligible for mechanical thrombectomy in three different position : Patients admitted first in the Comprehensive Stroke Center of Montpellier, those transferred after Proximity Stroke Unit or prehospital bypass for patients with high suspicion of large vessel occlusion.to the Comprehensive Stroke Center of Montpellier

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Multiple RCT has recently proved the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy compared to the best medical therapy (BMT) on patients with recent cerebral infarct and anterior circulation intracranial large vessel occlusion.

In the Occitanie-Est region (ex Languedoc Roussillon), comprising 6 Stroke Unit, only the Comprehensive Stroke Unit of the CHU de Montpellier has a centre of interventional neuroradiology (NRI) that can perform mechanical thrombectomy.

Patients suspected of stroke are referred to the nearest SU, then the candidates for thrombectomy, are transferred secondarily to the Stroke Center in Montpellier.

Currently, there is no evidence that an initial management in a proximity stroke unit and a secondary transfer for a mechanical thrombectomy is associated with a loss of chance for patients, compared to patients initially treated at the Stroke Center regional reference.

The objective of the study is to compare clinical outcome on patients admitted first in the Comprehensive Stroke Center of Montpellier those transferred after Proximity Stroke Unit or directly admitted when high suspicion of large vessel occlusion.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Recruiting
        • Gui de Chauliac Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Caroline ARQUIZAN, MD
          • Phone Number: c-arquizan@chu-montpellier.fr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Acute cerebral infarct in the arterial circulation with large vessel occlusion

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient, admitted to the Emergency Department Head and Neck of the CHU de Montpellier, over 18 years old, without limit of upper age
  2. With TIA or cerebral infarction (confirmed by brain imaging (MRI or CT scan), acute (Time of stroke symptoms or discovery of patient ≤ 12 h)
  3. With anterior circulation intracranial large vessel occlusion (M1, T or proximal M2), confirmed by arterial imaging (magnetic resonance angiography-MRA- or angioscanner)
  4. No objection of the patient or their representative to being included in the cohort

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with severe intercurrent pathology impacting the short-term vital prognosis and making follow-up impossible
  2. Predictable impossibility of patient follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Score (mRS)
Time Frame: 3 months

Good functional outcome ( defined by a Modified Rankin Scale of 0-2, 3 months after stroke onset Modified Rankin scale . Range 0 (asymptomatic) to 6 (death)

  • Good outcome : 0 to 2
  • Disability : 3 to 5
  • Bad outcome : 5 and 6
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of mechanical thrombectomy treatment
Time Frame: 24 hours

Safety of medical complication

Complications of mechanical thrombectomy :

  • Vessel perforation
  • Intramural Arterial dissection
  • Symptomatic Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • embolization to a new territory
24 hours
Clinical evolution at 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours

NIHSS scale and NIHSS scale variation between the inclusion at 24 hours

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Range 0-42. Neurological severity score at the acute phase :

  • Minor stroke : 0 to 5
  • Moderate stroke 6 to 20
  • Severe stroke up to 21
24 hours
Clinical evolution 7 days
Time Frame: 7 days

NIHSS scale and NIHSS scale variation between the inclusion at 7 days

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Range 0-42. Neurological severity score at the acute phase :

  • Minor stroke : 0 to 5
  • Moderate stroke 6 to 20
  • Severe stroke up to 21
7 days
Proportion of patients having had mechanical trombectomy (and/or intravenous thrombolysis) amongst patient cohort.
Time Frame: 24 hours
Number of patients having had mechanical trombectomy (and/or intravenous thrombolysis) amongst patient cohort.
24 hours
Symptomatic Intracerebral Haemorrhage
Time Frame: 24 hours
symptomatic Intracerebral Haemorrhage on cerebral imaging at 24 hours
24 hours
Arterial Recanalisation with TICI score
Time Frame: post-act / 24 hours

Quality of revascularization after mechanical thrombectomy : immediate post-Mechanical-Trombectomy evaluation for patient having had mechanical thrombectomy and at 24 hours for all patient cohort.

TICI score (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction grading system) describe the quality of revascularization after mechanical thrombectomy (Grade 0 for no perfusion at 3 for Complete perfusion)

post-act / 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caroline ARQUIZAN, MD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Mechanical thrombectomy

3
Subscribe