Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Neck Pain

Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

To compare the effects of kinesio taping, cervical thrust manipulation and conventional therapy on neck pain, functional status and range of motion

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Neck Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Kinesio taping group; Other: Cervical thrust manipulation group; Other: Conventional therapy group

Detailed Description

Neck pain is most prevalent condition affecting globally, which also create threats to the individuals. Mechanical neck pain affects mainly two third of population at some time in life possibly in middle age, some people may be acute mechanical neck pain while some leading to chronic stage. Mechanical neck disorders usually associated with pain, decreased cervical mobility, spasm. Often neck pain is mechanical in nature, according to literature mechanical neck pain is defined as, that pain originating from cervical spine which may be aggravated with cervical motion, prolonged posture, muscular stiffness. Due to widespread occurrence of mechanical neck pain mainly in modern society, proper interventional strategies of this problem is needed to facilitate that problem. Incidence of neck pain may range from 10.4-23.3%in one year, while according to previous literature prevalence of neck pain was 0.4 to 86.8%, with high proportion in office workers, computer users, and females especially 35 to 55 years. Pain, stiffness, tenderness and restricted mobility is most common symptoms associated with neck pain, manual therapy techniques, exercises, mobilization, manipulations, kinesio taping are treatment strategies used for this problem may improve neck pain.

The main purpose of my study is to improve neck pain, discomfort and functional status in patients with mechanical neck pain.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 39
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Pakistan
  • Federal
    • Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan
      • Natural Medicine and Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 55 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects having mechanical neck pain.
• participants having neck pain more than 1 month.

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of serious pathology (Malignancy, inflammatory disorders).
• Cervical spinal surgery.
• History of trauma or fracture.
• Vascular syndromes.
• Neurological and cardiac pathologies.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Kinesio taping group; Participants in this group will receive treatment through standardized therapeutic Kinesio taping along with conventional therapy. Tape will be water proof, porous, adhesive,with width of 5cm and thickness of 0.5 mm.	Other: Kinesio taping group; Participants in this group will receive treatment through standardised therapeutic kinesio taping along with conventional therapy. Tape will place over the posterior cervical extensor muscle, from insertion to the origin, with the patient's neck in cervical contralateral side-bending and rotation. Duration of kinesio tape will be of 48 hours with 50-100% tension. Participants of this group will also receive conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching exercises of the neck muscles. This protocol is for 6 weeks. The sessions will be given twice a week making it a total of 12 sessions.
Experimental: Cervical thrust manipulation group; Participants in this group will receive treatment via cervical thrust manipulation along with conventional therapy. Manipulation will be directed on mid cervical spine.	Other: Cervical thrust manipulation group; Participants of this group will receive treatment via cervical thrust manipulation along with conventional therapy. For mid cervical spine thrust manipulation, the patient will be in supine lying position,with cervical spine in neutral position. The therapist will cradle the patients head with the other hand. Gentle ipsilateral cervical side flexion and contralateral rotation will introduce until tension will perceive in target tissues at contact point. A high velocity, low amplitude thrust manipulation, will direct upward and medially in direction of subject's contralateral eye. Participants of this group will also receive conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching exercises of the neck muscles. This intervention protocol is for 6 weeks. The sessions will be given twice a week making it a total of 12 sessions with 1 month follow up.
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy group; .Participants of this group will receive only conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching Exercises	Other: Conventional therapy group; Participants of this group will receive only conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching Exercises of neck muscles. For sternocleidomastoid stretching, the subject will ask to sit or stand facing forward, exhale and slowly turn your head to right, by keeping shoulder relaxed and down,inhale and return to the center, then turn to look at your left shoulder, ask to hold this position for 30 seconds and do 3 repetitions. For Trapezius stretching, patient is seated upright, therapist then passively move right ear to right shoulder. This study includes interventional protocol of 6 weeks. The session will be given twice a week making it a total of 12 sessions with 1 month follow up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Cervical range of motion	This tool will be used to detect cervical range of motion like cervical flexion, cervical extension, cervical side bending and cervical rotation at the baseline and at the end of 6th week. Cervical spines range of motion is 80-90 degrees of flexion, 70 degrees of extension, 20-45 degrees of lateral bending and up to 90 degrees of rotations.	6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Numerical pain rating scale	This tool will be used in order to measure the intensity of pain at the baseline and at the end of 6th week. Maximum score on the scale is 10. Lower score means no pain and vice versa. Interpretation of the scores are as following: 0 indicates no pain. 1-3 indicates mild pain. 4-7 indicates moderate pain. 8-10 indicates worst possible pain.	6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Neck functional stability	This tool will be used to measure functional stability of neck at the baseline. Maximum score on the scale is 50. Lower score means less disability of the neck and vice versa. Interpretation of the scores are as following: 0-4 indicates no disability. 5-14 indicates mild disability. 15-24 indicates moderate disability. 25-34 indicates severe disability. Above 34 indicates complete disability	6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Riphah International University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 26, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 16, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): February 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 17, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 12, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): October 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 23, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 8, 2022
• Last Verified: March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Kinesio taping; Cervical manipulation; Mechanical neck pain
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Neck Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: REC/00946 Taqdees e Maryam

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No