FAST-IRM for HCC suRveillance in pAtients With High risK of Liver Cancer. (FASTRAK)

March 10, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomized Study Evaluating the Cost Impact and Effectiveness of Systematic Liver Fast-MRI Surveillance for Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-risk Patients Included in Ultrasound Surveillance Programs

Intro: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th leading cause of cancer worldwide. In France, more than 10,000 new cases are identified each year. The latter occur in 85% of cases in cirrhosis, the most frequent causes of which are excessive alcohol consumption, metabolic syndrome or HBV/HCV infection. Patients with cirrhosis justify being included in monitoring programs involving the performance of a semi-annual liver ultrasound (US) in order to detect HCC eligible for curative treatment (liver resection or percutaneous ablation). This practice is considered to be cost-effective in the event of an annual incidence of HCC> 1.5%. US in this context has a low sensitivity for the detection of HCC at the very early stage and the following observations have been made in the last 20 years:

  • The rate of patients detected at early stage BCLC 0 is around 30% by ultrasound
  • The rate of patients included in surveillance programs detected with advanced HCC eligible for palliative treatment is around 20%
  • Reducing the periodicity of liver ultrasounds from 6 to 3 months does not improve these results.

In parallel, liver MRI has been evaluated as a tool for the early detection of HCC. Its performance for the detection of HCC at the very early stage exceeds 80%. However, due to the higher cost compared to US, it was estimated that its use in screening context would only be cost effective in the event of an annual incidence> 3%. In addition, the practice of these expensive and long-lasting MRIs (30 to 45 minutes) can be optimized by carrying out abbreviated MRI protocols" or Fast-MRI: short protocols (<10 minutes), based on the sequences with the better detection sensitivities (Se> 83%).

The hypothesis is that Fast-MRI used as a screening examination in patients at high risk of HCC (> 3% per year) could increase the rates of patients detected at an early stage accessible to curative treatment and demonstrate its cost-effectiveness in this population.

Hypothesis/Objective: The main objective is to assess the cost / QALY and / patient detected with an early HCC BCLC 0 (single tumor <2cm) by semi-annual monitoring by liver US and Fast-MRI, compared to conventional semi-annual monitoring by liver US alone in patients with cirrhosis and an anticipated HCC incidence>3%.

Conclusion: If positive, this trial could modify international practice guidelines and set MRI as the optimal tool for early HCC detection in high-risk patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Method: This is a randomized controlled, multicenter, 2 parallel arm, superiority trial carried out in patients at high risk of HCC>3%. Patients with cirrhosis of non-viral cause or controlled/eradicated for HBV/HCV infection will be included if their estimated yearly HCC incidence is above 3% according to clinical risk stratification scoring systems previously developed (and published) in French population. Randomization will be individual according to a 1: 1 allocation ratio, centralized and stratified on the center. After inclusion in the trial, each patient will be randomized to be assigned to the experimental group (six-month liver US and fast-MRI) or control (six-month liver US only). At each semi-annual visit, a patient will be considered free from nodules if neither ultrasound nor Fast-MRI detects a nodule. If a nodule is detected by either of the two exams, the patient will undergo a characterization process according to international recommendations, using a combination of injected sectional imaging and/or liver biopsy. The diagnosis of HCC will be definitively assessed in each center during a multidisciplinary consultation meeting. The primary analysis will be carried out by intention to treat.

The rates of BCLC 0 stage HCC will be compared between the two arms. Medico-economic efficiency criterion will be based on an analysis of the different costs from the point of view of the healthcare system and on an analysis of clinical effectiveness in real life and will be supplemented by a budget impact analysis from the point of view of Health Insurance. The time horizon extends from inclusion up to 3 years with an annual update of costs and benefits at 2.5%.Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D5L scale, their variations to the total costs evaluated for each arm will be compared. QALYs will be calculated in each group. The costs and QALYs will be compared for the 2 strategies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

944

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bondy, France, 93140
        • Recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - Hôpital Avicenne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient enrolled in a screening program for at least 6 months in a tertiary hepatology center
  • Cirrhosis histologically proven or unequivocally suggested by non-invasive tests
  • Absence of HCC on imaging less than 3 months o
  • Liver parenchyma explorable by ultrasound
  • Child-Pugh A or B
  • Cirrhosis of non-viral or viral B/C cause controlled/healed
  • With an estimated annual risk of HCC>3%
  • Written informed consent
  • Affiliation to a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child-Pugh C score
  • Active hepatitis B or C
  • Estimated annual risk of HCC<3%
  • No prior enrollment in a screening program
  • Contraindication to Fast-MRI
  • Non-echogenic patient
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient on AME (state medical aid)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enhanced screening
Half-yearly liver ultrasound and fast-MRI
Half-yearly liver ultrasound and fast-MRI
Active Comparator: Screening recommendations
Half-yearly liver ultrasound
Half-yearly liver ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental cost / QALY ratio
Time Frame: at 36 months
Medico-economic efficiency criterion will assess the quality of life using the EQ-5D5L scale and compare their variations to the total costs evaluated for each arm.
at 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of HCC detected at early stage
Time Frame: at 36 months
Rates of BCLC 0 stage HCC detected every 6 months
at 36 months
Sensitivity
Time Frame: at 36 months
at 36 months
Specificity
Time Frame: at 36 months
at 36 months
Rates of curative HCC treatments
Time Frame: at 36 months
at 36 months
Survival
Time Frame: at 36 months
at 36 months
Compliance
Time Frame: at 36 months
Compliance with follow-up visits
at 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pierre NAHON, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 23, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 23, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Liver ultrasound and fast-MRI

Subscribe