Analytical Performances and Clinical Impact of the Roche Cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay in the Management of Adult and Pediatric Patients Attending the Emergency Room

October 21, 2021 updated by: Erasme University Hospital
Molecular techniques for respiratory virus detection have already shown benefits in terms of sensitivity gained in comparison to conventional techniques. Recent progress has made it possible to shorten turnaround time (TAT) and to allow delivery of results in a timely manner, especially in comparison to cell culture and direct fluorescence assays (DFA). However, the cost of these molecular assays is usually not taken in charge by public health insurance system. This could be partly explained by the fact that molecular techniques have not clearly shown cost-effectiveness. Results of molecular tests for influenza viruses and RSV, if delivered rapidly, in the emergency room (ER), would most likely help avoid antibiotic use and ancillary test prescription, improve antiviral prescription and shorten length of stay in the ward by facilitating discharge or cohorting of hospitalized patients. The goal of this study is to assess the performances of Roche Cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay, to appraise its clinical impact and to evaluate its cost effectiveness.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Brugmann hospital
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Erasme Hospital
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Huderf
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Saint-Pierre Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Either a pre-test indication of hospitalization
  • or an underlying situation at risk of respiratory complication following influenza infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analytical performance (Sensitivity/Specificity)
Time Frame: through study completion, 6 months
Calculation of sensitivity and specificity of the test versus a composite reference standard. Samples are considered as positive for a viral pathogen if testing positive for this viral pathogen by at least 2 of the 3 techniques used, negative if tested negative by at least 2 of the 3 techniques (culture, antigen detection and PCR test).
through study completion, 6 months
Hospital admission intentions
Time Frame: through study completion, 6 months
Number of admission intentions before and after the test result
through study completion, 6 months
Isolation intentions
Time Frame: through study completion, 6 months
Number of isolation intentions before and after the test result
through study completion, 6 months
Antibiotic prescription intentions
Time Frame: through study completion, 6 months
Number of antibiotic prescription intentions before and after the test result
through study completion, 6 months
Antiviral treatment prescription intentions
Time Frame: through study completion, 6 months
Number of antiviral treatments prescription intentions before and after the test result
through study completion, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on RSV Infection

Clinical Trials on Roche Cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay

Subscribe