IMPase in Treatment-resistant Depression (OxIMP)

July 4, 2023 updated by: University of Oxford

Does the IMPase Inhibitor, Ebselen, Affect Emotional Processing and Brain Myo-inositol in Treatment-resistant Depression?

This experimental medicine study will examine the effects of a brief period (seven days) of 'add on' ebselen (SPI-105) treatment in patients with resistant depression to see if ebselen produces changes in emotional responses consistent with a potential clinical antidepressant effect. The investigators will also seek to confirm ebselen's mode of action on IMPase by measuring changes in a brain chemical called inositol, using a magnetic imaging method. Half of the participants will receive ebselen and the other half placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ebselen, a potential new drug for treatment resistent depression (TRD).

Clinical depression is an important public health problem, associated with an even greater burden of illness than other common diseases such as angina, arthritis, asthma, and diabetes. The burden of illness is particularly high for depressed patients in specialist psychiatric care who often fare poorly with current treatments and who typically experience substantial functional disability with a significantly increased risk of suicide. A limiting factor in improving outcome for such patients is the lack of acceptable pharmacological approaches for so-called 'TRD'. In a recent large randomised trial, even specialist mood disorder services with access to expert psychological and pharmacological treatment, struggled to improve therapeutic response rates compared to 'treatment as usual'. This indicates that improving the management of TRD requires more than improved access to specialist clinics - new, more effective and better tolerated therapies are needed.

The principal aim of the current study is to examine the utility of a potential new lithium-mimetic drug, ebselen, in patients with TRD. Lithium itself is known to be efficacious in the management of TRD as an 'add-on' treatment to ineffective antidepressant medication. However, its poor tolerability and safety and the need for regular blood tests has resulted in it having a low acceptability for both patients and clinicians.

Lithium has many pharmacological targets but inhibition of an enzyme called inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) is an important candidate for its therapeutic effects in mood disorders. However, this potential mechanism has not been tested previously in depressed patients. Ebselen is an organoselenium compound, developed originally as an antioxidant for use in neuroprotection, post-stroke. Although clinical trials indicated that ebselen was safe and well-tolerated, its therapeutic activity in stroke patients was limited and its commercial development was halted. Subsequent work in the University of Oxford's Department of Pharmacology found that ebselen is a bioavailable and brain penetrant inhibitor of inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) (Ki ≈ 1 μM) (8). This finding provides an opportunity to use ebselen as a means of testing the role of IMPase inhibition in the therapeutic effect of lithium in TRD.

Recently, experimental medicine models developed in the University of Oxford's Department of Psychiatry have shown promise in describing early surrogate markers of patient responsiveness to antidepressants. Traditionally, the translation of novel potential antidepressant compounds from animal studies to humans has involved placebo-controlled clinical trials that are expensive and take many years. The newer, more experimental medicine studies exploiting the use of surrogate markers for depression and antidepressant drug action have the potential to transform this field and refine development decisions while minimising time and cost and burden on patients.

The surrogate markers of antidepressant efficacy that the investigators have developed for this process are based on cognitive theories of depression and antidepressant action. Cognitive theories of depression outline the role of negative emotional biases in information processing in the aetiology and maintenance of the disorder. For example, compared to controls, depressed patients are more likely to perceive ambiguous facial expressions as negative and to retrieve negative self-relevant information in both explicit and indirect memory paradigms. These cognitive biases are believed to play a key role in the persistence of the depressed state because increased accessibility of negative perceptions and memories maintains and exaggerates the depressed mood leading to a self-perpetuating cycle.

Importantly, cognitive biases shift early in antidepressant treatment, and positive changes in emotional processing can be demonstrated in relatively small groups of patients. Subsequent studies showed that early positive shifts in emotional processing predict eventual therapeutic outcome to antidepressant medication.

The investigators have previously used these experimental medicine approaches to assess the effects of ebselen in healthy volunteers. The investigators found that, given at a dose of 600 mg, as well as 1200 mg twice daily, ebselen produced a greater recognition of some positive emotions, an effect the investigators have noted with numerous typical and atypical antidepressants and a strong predictor of clinical antidepressant activity. The investigators also utilised magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and demonstrated a reduction in brain inositol after treatment with ebselen. This provides evidence for IMPase target engagement of ebselen at the dose proposed for this study. Therefore, the investigators now have substantial data that indicates that ebselen is a valid means of testing IMPase inhibition as a potential antidepressant mechanism in a clinical population of TRD patients, using an experimental medicine approach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX37JX
        • Recruiting
        • Neurosciences Building, Dept. Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Philip J Cowen, MBBS, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study;
  • Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the tasks;
  • Registered with a General Practitioner (GP) and consents to GP being informed of participation in the study;
  • Participants need to meet a number of concurrent clinical criteria:
  • Current criteria for Major Depressive Disorder as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (SCID-5);
  • Inadequate response to at least one adequate course of antidepressant therapy given at a therapeutic dose for at least four weeks in the current episode of depression.
  • Minimum score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) of at least 14;
  • Currently taking a licensed antidepressant at a therapeutic dose for at least four weeks
  • Pre-menopausal women and male participants engaging in sex with a risk of pregnancy must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception from Screening Visit until 30 days after receiving the study medication treatment. Acceptable methods of contraception include:

    • Combined (estrogen- and progestogen-containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, intravaginal or transdermal;
    • Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, injectable or implantable;
    • Intrauterine device (IUD);
    • Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS);
    • Bilateral tubal occlusion;
    • Vasectomy (or vasectomised partner);
    • Sexual abstinence. [Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), withdrawal (coitus interruptus), and spermicides only are not acceptable methods of contraception.]
  • Male participants must not donate sperm.
  • Participants taking non-prescription/prescription medication may still be entered into the study, if, in the opinion of the Investigator, the medication received will not interfere with the study procedures or compromise safety
  • Willing to refrain from drinking alcohol for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of /or current DSM-5 bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or emotionally unstable personality disorder;
  • Participants who fulfil current criteria for other comorbid disorders may still be entered into the study, if, in the opinion of the Investigator, the psychiatric diagnosis will not compromise safety or affect data quality;
  • Participants who have failed to respond to standard pharmacological augmentation treatments for depression (lithium and atypical antipsychotic drugs);
  • Clinically significant risk of suicide;
  • Participants undergoing or who have undergone electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of the current episode of depression;
  • History of significant alcohol/substance misuse or dependence over the past 6 months;
  • History of, or current general medical conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator may interfere with the safety of the participant or the scientific integrity of the study;
  • Current pregnancy (as determined by urine pregnancy test taken during the Screening Visit and the Research Visit One), breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the course of the study;
  • Participants with Body Mass Index (BMI - kg/m2) outside the 18-36 range at Screening Visit;
  • Participants with severe claustrophobia;
  • Participants who are contraindicated for MRI;
  • Previous participation in a study using the same, or similar, emotional processing tasks in the last three months;
  • Previous participation in a study involving the use of an interventional medication within the last three months;
  • Participant with planned medical treatment within the study period that might interfere with the study procedures;
  • Participant who is unlikely to comply with the clinical study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason, in the opinion of the Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ebselen
The intervention will be 7-10 days administration of ebselen 600 mg twice daily taken orally. Ebselen has been manufactured to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards and will be provided by Sound Pharmaceuticals Inc. in 200 mg capsules.
Ebselen is an organoselenium compound, developed originally as an antioxidant for use in neuroprotection, post-stroke. Ebselen is a bioavailable and brain penetrant inhibitor of inositol monophosphatase (IMPase) (Ki ≈ 1 μM).
Other Names:
  • SPI-1005
  • PZ-51
  • Ebselene
  • Ebselenum
  • Ebseleno
  • Harmokisane
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The intervention will be 7-10 days administration of placebo 600 mg twice daily taken orally.Identical placebo capsules have been manufactured and formulated in the same facilities as the active treatment.
Matched placebo capsules
Other Names:
  • Dummy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in positive and negative facial expression recognition task
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in accuracy to recognise computer-based positive and negative facial expressions (anger, disgust, fear, happy, sad, surprise)
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change in misclassifications on emotional processing task
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Differences in misclassifications (number of responses to each facial expression category incorrectly classified as another facial expression category).
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change in reaction time on emotional processing task
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Differences in reaction time to recognise facial expressions
Change between groups from baseline to day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in accuracy in the Emotional Categorisation Task
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in Emotional Categorisation Task (ECAT): accuracy to classify positive and negative descriptor words
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change in reaction time in the Emotional Categorisation Task (ECAT)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Differences in reaction time to classify positive and negative descriptor words
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on Facial Dot Probe Task (FDOT)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Differences in Vigilance scores derived from reaction time
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on Emotional Recall Task (EREC)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Differences in number of words correctly recalled (hits) and number of words incorrectly recalled (false alarms).
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on Emotional Recognition Memory Task (EMEM)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in Emotional Recognition Memory Task (EMEM): accuracy and reaction time to correctly recognise positive and negative words (hits), and number of incorrectly recognised words (false alarms)
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on brain inositol levels
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in levels of inositol as determined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on glutamate levels
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in levels of glutamate as determined by MRS
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on glutamine levels
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in levels of glutamine as determined by MRS
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change on choline levels
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in levels of choline as determined by MRS
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in the 10-item MADRS between groups. Total score 0-60.
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self report (QIDS-SR)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in 16 item self-rated QIDS-SR between groups. Total score 0-42.
Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Change in Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment -7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Change between groups from baseline to day 7
Difference in the 7 item self-rated GAD-7 between groups. Total score 0-21
Change between groups from baseline to day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip J Cowen, MBBS, MD, Dept. Psychiatry, University of Oxford

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Clinical Trials on Ebselen

Subscribe