- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05119673
POCUS for Difficult Peripheral Access in the Emergency Department - a RCT
Point-of-care Ultrasound for Difficult Peripheral Vascular Access in the Emergency Department - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Peripheral intravenous line insertion is the most commonly performed invasive procedure in the emergency department (ED). In some studies, difficult vascular access population was about 33% of evaluated patients and for most of them the "blind" method (i.e., palpation) fails in the line insertion. Ultrasound guidance often increase the success rate among these patients.
Two basic techniques were proposed for sonographic guidance, a transversal or a longitudinal approach to the chosen vessel (i.e., out-of-plane or in-plane view, respectively, "mono-plane" approach).
The availability of hand-held sonographic devices is increasing the number of emergency department were this guidance is used in a difficult vascular access population.
The Butterly iQ+ device is now able to show out-of-plane and in-plane views, simultaneously, the so called bi-plane view.
Aim of this randomized controlled trial is to test if a bi-plane sonographic vision might be able to increase the performance of trained operators in obtaining a peripheral vascular access among difficult patients admitted to the ED.
The present study will be a randomized controlled, 2-arm, nonblinded trial held at the Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University hospital, Turin, Italy.
All healthcare workers already trained in ultrasound-guided vascular access will be considered eligible for the study (i.e., emergency physicians, residents, nurses) after an ad hoc brief (2 hours) training on the study.
This will be a "real world" study, each provider will be free of choosing the device he/she thought appropriate for each patient (in terms of length, gauge, type - peripheral midline will be included in the Italian center).
Using a computerized permuted blocks of random sizes, enrolled patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to be evaluated using either the "standard" ultrasound-guided approach (out-of-place or in-plane view) or the bi-plane view (i.e. out-of-place and in-plane view, simultaneously).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Turin, Italy
- Emergency Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Univeristy Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria: at least one of the following criteria have to be present along with the need for a peripheral access
- chronic renal disease/ongoing dialysis;
- sickle cell anemia;
- prolonged and/or frequent use of i.v. drugs;
- difficult vascular access (after a first attempt or self-reported);
- previously need for more than one attempts / ultrasound guidance for getting a peripheral vascular access.
Exclusion Criteria:
- no consent to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: mono-plane sonographic view
Usual standard of care, in our institution, for difficult peripheral vascular access in the Emergency Department.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: bi-plane sonographic view
|
Bi-plane Butterfly iQ+® sonographic visualization will be used to help Emergency Department operators to get a venous peripheral access in a population of patients considered difficult for this task based on their history or the present clinical situation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
number of attempts of each peripheral i.v. access placement
Time Frame: Through study completion, likely of 1 year and half
|
The number of attempts needed for getting a peripheral i.v.
access will be measured
|
Through study completion, likely of 1 year and half
|
|
Time needed for each peripheral i.v. access placement
Time Frame: Through study completion, likely of 1 year and half
|
Time needed for for getting a peripheral i.v.
access will be measured
|
Through study completion, likely of 1 year and half
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Emanuele Pivetta, MD,PhD, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883. No abstract available.
- Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.
- Kumar A, Chuan A. Ultrasound guided vascular access: efficacy and safety. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Sep;23(3):299-311. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.02.006.
- Oliver WC Jr, Nuttall GA, Beynen FM, Raimundo HS, Abenstein JP, Arnold JJ. The incidence of artery puncture with central venous cannulation using a modified technique for detection and prevention of arterial cannulation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997 Dec;11(7):851-5. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90119-1.
- Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;24(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020.
- Schummer W, Schummer C, Tuppatsch H, Fuchs J, Bloos F, Huttemann E. Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation: is there a difference between Doppler and B-mode ultrasound? J Clin Anesth. 2006 May;18(3):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.12.010.
- Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell JE, Midgley FM, Ruttimann UE. Comparison of three techniques for internal jugular vein cannulation in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(5):505-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00554.x.
- Keenan SP. Use of ultrasound to place central lines. J Crit Care. 2002 Jun;17(2):126-37. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2002.34364.
- Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A. Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;48(5):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
- Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, Samonis G, Tsoutsos DA, Konstadoulakis MM, Karabinis A. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R162. doi: 10.1186/cc5101.
- Augoustides JG, Horak J, Ochroch AE, Vernick WJ, Gambone AJ, Weiner J, Pinchasik D, Kowalchuk D, Savino JS, Jobes DR. A randomized controlled clinical trial of real-time needle-guided ultrasound for internal jugular venous cannulation in a large university anesthesia department. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005 Jun;19(3):310-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.03.007.
- Troianos CA, Jobes DR, Ellison N. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 1991 Jun;72(6):823-6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199106000-00020. No abstract available.
- Mallory DL, McGee WT, Shawker TH, Brenner M, Bailey KR, Evans RG, Parker MM, Farmer JC, Parillo JE. Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of internal jugular vein cannulation. A prospective, randomized trial. Chest. 1990 Jul;98(1):157-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.1.157.
- Pittiruti M, Hamilton H, Biffi R, MacFie J, Pertkiewicz M; ESPEN. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications). Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):365-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 May 21.
- Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, Reeves ST; Councils on Intraoperative Echocardiography and Vascular Ultrasound of the American Society of Echocardiography. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Dec;24(12):1291-318. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.021. No abstract available.
- Maecken T, Grau T. Ultrasound imaging in vascular access. Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5 Suppl):S178-85. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260629.86351.A5.
- Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR. Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography. Anaesthesia. 2006 Feb;61(2):148-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04475.x.
- Ortega R, Song M, Hansen CJ, Barash P. Videos in clinical medicine. Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):e57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm0810156. No abstract available.
- French JL, Raine-Fenning NJ, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Pitfalls of ultrasound guided vascular access: the use of three/four-dimensional ultrasound. Anaesthesia. 2008 Aug;63(8):806-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05513.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
- Hopkins RE, Bradley M. In-vitro visualization of biopsy needles with ultrasound: a comparative study of standard and echogenic needles using an ultrasound phantom. Clin Radiol. 2001 Jun;56(6):499-502. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0707.
- Venkatesan K. Echo-enhanced needles for short-axis ultrasound-guided vascular access. Int J Emerg Med. 2010 Apr 10;3(3):205. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0164-1. No abstract available.
- Reynolds N, McCulloch AS, Pennington CR, MacFadyen RJ. Assessment of distal tip position of long-term central venous feeding catheters using transesophageal echocardiology. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001 Jan-Feb;25(1):39-41. doi: 10.1177/014860710102500139.
- Hsu JH, Wang CK, Chu KS, Cheng KI, Chuang HY, Jaw TS, Wu JR. Comparison of radiographic landmarks and the echocardiographic SVC/RA junction in the positioning of long-term central venous catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Jul;50(6):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01025.x.
- Leyvi G, Taylor DG, Reith E, Wasnick JD. Utility of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in pediatric surgical patients: a clinical series. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Nov;15(11):953-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01609.x.
- Lamperti M, Caldiroli D, Cortellazzi P, Vailati D, Pedicelli A, Tosi F, Piastra M, Pietrini D. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound assistance during internal jugular vein cannulation in neurosurgical infants. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Nov;34(11):2100-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1210-9. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
- Abboud PA, Kendall JL. Ultrasound guidance for vascular access. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004 Aug;22(3):749-73. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2004.04.003.
- Stone MB, Moon C, Sutijono D, Blaivas M. Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;28(3):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
- Nichols I, Humphrey JP. The efficacy of upper arm placement of peripherally inserted central catheters using bedside ultrasound and microintroducer technique. J Infus Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):165-76. doi: 10.1097/01.NAN.0000317703.66395.b8.
- Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Beverley CA, Thomas SM. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Anaesthesia. 2004 Nov;59(11):1116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03906.x.
- Convissar D, Bittner EA, Chang MG. Biplane Imaging Versus Standard Transverse Single-Plane Imaging for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Prospective Controlled Crossover Trial. Crit Care Explor. 2021 Oct 8;3(10):e545. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000545. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- POCUS-DiffAcc
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emergencies
-
Société Française d'Anesthésie et de RéanimationNot yet recruiting
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Technische Universität DresdenCompletedPerformance in Simulated Emergencies | Stress During Simulator Scenario | Behaviour of Physicians in Simulated EmergenciesGermany
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRecruitingMedical EmergenciesFrance
-
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardRecruitingMedical EmergenciesUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad de AntioquiaCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...UnknownMedical EmergenciesChina
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyZentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung in DeutschlandUnknownNon-urgent EmergenciesGermany
-
Peking University People's HospitalBeijing Emergency Medical Center; Beijing Red Cross Emergency CenterCompletedEmergencies [Disease/Finding]China
-
Chinese University of Hong KongUnknownEmergencies | Cancer | Oncologic Complications and EmergenciesChina