- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05120063
Benefit of 3-D Planning in Total Hip Replacement. A Prospective Randomized Study
In this prospective randomized four-armed study the investigators aim to compare wheter 3-D planning, which necessitates preoperative CT acquisition and sophisticated planning together with engineers, results in measurable benefits in terms of objective and subjective outcome values in a collective of patients undergoing primary total hip replacement.
Hypothesis:
- When compared to 2-D planning, 3-D planning of a THR results in better hip reconstruction, better subjective and clinical outcome and better longevity of total hip implants.
- When compared to a non-anatomical stem, an anatomical stem allows better hip reconstruction, better subjective and clinical outcome and better longevity of total hip implants.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Patients sent to our outpatient clinic for eventual primary THR are informed about this study and written patient information given to them. When patients decide to undergo primary total hip replacement, patient's questions with respect to this study are discussed in the outpatient clinic and patients willing to participate included.
Block randomization using closed envelopes for age categories 40-50, 50-60, 60-70 years will be conducted to assign the participant to one of the four study arms.
Patients will be blinded for the type of stem and method of planning. Investigators are blined in terms of methods of planning. In terms of stem design, investigators can not be blinded since their visibility on x-ray does not allow it.
The preoperative investigation includes routine investigation and an additional CT scan plus evaluation of the "University of California at Los Angeles" (UCLA) activity level and "Short Form Health 36" (SF-36) score. The same applies for the postoperative investigation and 3 months. The follow-up visits at 1, 5 and 10 years are routine investigations with additional UCLA and SF-36 Scores.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients aged 40-70 years scheduled for primary THR
- signed written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Charnley class B and C
- ASA score >2
- pregnancy
- gross hip deformity making complex hip reconstruction (greater trochanter advancement, acetabular augmentation, femoral osteotomy, use of cemented or revision stem) necessary
- immature patients and patients incompetent to judge
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 3D anatomical stem
3-D-Planing with anatomical stem (SPS monoblock stem, Symbios)
|
hip prosthesis
primary total-hip replacement (THR) planned on 3-dimensional images (computer tomography)
|
Experimental: 3D non-anatomical stem
3-D-Planing with non anatomical stem (Quadra-H, Medacta)
|
primary total-hip replacement (THR) planned on 3-dimensional images (computer tomography)
hip prosthesis
|
Experimental: 2D anatomical stem
2-D-Planing with anatomical stem (SPS monoblock stem, Symbios)
|
hip prosthesis
primary total-hip replacement (THR) planned on 2-dimensional images (anteroposteiros pelciv x-ray)
|
Experimental: 2D non anatomical stem
2-D-Planning with non anatomical Stem (Quadra-H, Medacta)
|
hip prosthesis
primary total-hip replacement (THR) planned on 2-dimensional images (anteroposteiros pelciv x-ray)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Change from basline to one year
|
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely used, proprietary set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the hip. A difference in WOMAC of 2.5 points is considered relevant. 3-D-planing and/or anatomical stems will be considered superior to 2-D-planing and /or non-anatomical stems if the one year WOMAC significantly differs by 2.5. |
Change from basline to one year
|
Change in subjective hip value (SHV)
Time Frame: Change from basline to one year
|
The subjective hip value (SHV) is as a patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) which is reported by the patient. It is easily and quickly performed and interpreted. The SHV is defined as a patient's subjective hip satisfaction expressed as a percentage of 100%, which is the score that an entirely normal hip joint would reach. A difference in subj. hip value of 25% is considered relevant. 3-D-planing and/or anatomical stems will be considered superior to 2-D-planing and /or non-anatomical stems if the one year subjective hip value significantly differs by 25%. |
Change from basline to one year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KEK Nr. 2012-0064
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
3MRecruitingAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow SurgeryUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT SurgeryFrance
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbHNAMSARecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular SurgerySpain
-
Baylor Research InstituteChiesi USA, Inc.RecruitingSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
Surgify Medical OyCompletedSurgery | Spine SurgeryFinland
-
Cairo UniversityBatterjee Medical College; Taif UniversityCompletedSurgery | Bariatric SurgeryEgypt, Saudi Arabia
-
Poudre Valley Health SystemTerminatedSurgery | Surgery--ComplicationsUnited States