Mercuri Analysis Contribution on Handicap Evaluation in ArthrogypOsis, a Congenital Neuromuscular Disease (MACHAON)

November 16, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
The aim is to evaluate the correlation of quantified fibro-adipous infiltration of muscles, using the MRI-based Mercuri score, with deficiencies, activity limitations and social participation in patients with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) refers to a rare disease spectrum characterized by the presence of joint contractures at birth in at least two different body areas. Causes are multiple. Amyoplasia and distal arthrogryposes are the most frequent causes. Phenotypes consist of muscle weakness and atrophy of variant severity and joint deformities. The impact on mobility, activities or daily living and participation is variable (Dai et al, 2018).

Mercuri et al. (Mercuri et al, 2002) have developed a semi-quantitative score to mesure fibro-adipous muscle infiltration on muscle MRI.

Correlations between fibro-adipous infiltration and muscular deficits have already been studied in other neuromusclar diseases such as Pompe disease (Figueroa-Bonaparte et al, 2016) or Duchenne muscular dystrophy (Brogan et al, 2018). These studies revealed good correlation between disease onset, muscle strength and the degree of muscle fibro-adipous infiltration, calculated using the Mercuri score. The authors concluded that muscular MRI can be used to follow the neuromuscular disease progression as it is correlated with muscle function.

Contrary to these progressive diseases, AMC is a congenital non progressive condition. It is therefore tempting to hypothesize that the muscular fibro-adipous infiltration in these patients could be of prognostic value for future capacities.

Our aim is to evaluate the fibro-adipous muscle infiltration in a thoroughly phenotyped cohort of adult patients with Amyoplasia and Distal Arthrogryposes using the Mercuri score, based on muscular MRI, in order to evaluate the correlation with deficiencies, activity limitations and social participation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Chu Grenoble Alpes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adults with a diagnostic of Amyoplasia or distal arthrogryposis, evaluated by a all body MRI, and functionnal evaluation during day hospitalisation in adult neurorehabilitation department of grenoble, between 2010 and october 2020

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults
  • with a diagnostic of Amyoplasia or distal arthrogryposis
  • evaluated by a all body MRI
  • functionnal evaluation during day hospitalisation in neurorehabilitation department
  • between 2010 and october 2020

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other aetiology of Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC)
  • incomplete MRI or medical files
  • interaction with other disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Amyoplasia
patient with diagnosis of Amyoplasia
no intervention
Distal arthrogryposis
patient with diagnosis of Distal arthrogryposis
no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mercuri Scores of upper limbs, lower limbs,and trunk evaluated on MRI T1
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
The degree of muscle fat infiltration was assessed with at least 2 visible slices. We used the four-point scale proposed by Mercuri et al 2002. Each muscle was staged as follows: 1. Normal appearance, 2. Mild involvement. 3. Moderate involvement. 4. Severe involvement.
during 5 day evaluation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
muscle weakness
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
muscular weakness was assessed by function (flexion, extension etc.) and not by each muscle, using the Medical Research Council scale (0-5) for muscle weakness. The grading was as follows: 0, no contraction; 1, flicker or trace of contraction; 2, active movement possible only with gravity eliminated; 3, active movement against gravity in the whole range of motion; 4, active movement against gravity and resistance; 5, quasi-normal strength.
during 5 day evaluation
passive range of motion
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
passive range of motion evaluated by physiotherapists, The range of motion of each movement (i.e. amplitude) was normalized with respect to the normal maximal movement, expressed as percentages
during 5 day evaluation
6 minutes walking test
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
Mobility was assessed by the 6MWT20, performed by individuals who were asked to walk as self-preferred speed in a straight line on the floor with sequences of 30 meters, with a half-turn at each end. In case of interruption (fatigue, pain, dyspnea), patients were allowed to rest, until they felt able to restart.
during 5 day evaluation
reaching score
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
The ability to reach some body targets with upper limbs was assessed by ad hoc test. Individuals sitting on a chair were instructed to successively touch their mouths, heads, necks, backs, opposite shoulders, ipsilateral shoulders, knees and feet, with both hands. Each successful touch scored two points if easily performed, and one point if performed with difficulty. The total score was calculated on both sides averaged and ranged from 0 to 16 points.
during 5 day evaluation
Functionnal independance measure
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
Designed to assess areas of dysfunction in activities that commonly occur in subjects with any progressive, reversible or stable neurologic, musculoskeletal, or other disorder ie patients with functional mobility impairmentsThe motor subscale includes: Eating, Grooming, Bathing, Dressing, upper body, Dressing, lower body, Toileting, Bladder management, Bowel management, Transfers - bed/chair, wheelchair, Transfers - toilet, Transfers - bath/shower, Walk/wheelchair, Stairs, The cognition subscale includes: Comprehension, Expression, Social interaction, Problem solving, Memory Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item
during 5 day evaluation
pain evaluation
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
based on patient declaration, absence or presence (with pain scale) and pain localisations
during 5 day evaluation
activities in daily life
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
during 5 day evaluation
humain and technical aid
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
utilisation of technical aid (walking stick, manual or electric wheelchair), or humain for daly life activities
during 5 day evaluation
respiratory and speech difficulties
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
surgical history, capacity to speech
during 5 day evaluation
surgical history
Time Frame: during 5 day evaluation
personnal surgical history for each patient
during 5 day evaluation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dominic PERENNOU, MDPHD, Chu Grenoble Alpes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diagnosis of Arthrogryposis Amyoplasia or Distal Arthrogryposis

Clinical Trials on no intervention

Subscribe