Insignia™ Hip Stem Outcomes Study

May 14, 2026 updated by: Stryker Orthopaedics

Insignia™ Hip Stem Outcomes Study - A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for Total Hip Replacement Surgery

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for global market access and post-market clinical follow-up up to 10 years postoperative.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, post-market, multi-center clinical investigation of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a consecutive series of patients who meet the eligibility criteria. The total enrollment goal for the study is a minimum of 313 cases, all of which will receive the Insignia™ Hip Stem.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

313

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85023
        • The MORE Foundation
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89503
        • Reno Orthopedic Center Foundation
    • New York
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
        • Northwell Health: University Orthopaedic Associates
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • OrthoCarolina Research Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Alleghany Health Network- Research Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37204
        • TOA Research Foundation
    • Texas
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
        • Baylor Scott and White Medical Center
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Orthopedic Physician Associates
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99208
        • Providence Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject has signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, study specific Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  • The subject is skeletally mature
  • The subject has a diagnosis as listed in the instructions for use (IFU), which include non inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis, correction of functional deformity, treatment of nonunion, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures.
  • The subject is a candidate for a primary or revision cementless THA.
  • The subject is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the affected hip joint at the time of study device implantation.
  • The subject has any mental or neuromuscular disorder which would create an unacceptable risk of prosthesis instability, prosthesis fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care.
  • The subject has bone stock compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis.
  • The subject is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements (e.g. > 30 days).
  • The subject has a known sensitivity to device materials.
  • The subject is involved in any ongoing legal matter, investigation, or dispute pertaining to the operative site.
  • The subject is a prisoner.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

The Insignia™ Hip Stem is a collared stem that features a plasma-sprayed Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating over plasma-sprayed titanium in the proximal region and a plasma-sprayed HA coating over grit blast in the distal region and collar underside.

Insignia™ Hip Stems are intended for 'cement less' use only and are intended for total arthroplasty procedures.

Device: Replacement of arthritic hip with Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival Rate
Time Frame: 10 years
Evaluation of the survival rate for Insignia Hip Stem is defined as absence of femoral stem revision for aseptic loosening or device-related femoral fracture.
10 years
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: 10 Years

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion.

Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score.

A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor

10 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,5 and 7 years

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion.

Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score.

A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor

pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,5 and 7 years
EQ-5D - Descriptive System
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 years

The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values.

The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility self care, usual activities, pain/comfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels indicating no problems, some problems or extreme problems. The index values on a scale between -1 (low) and 1 (high) are showing the average health status according to the 5 dimensions: A low score shows worse health and a high score shows better health.

pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 years
EQ-5D - Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 years

The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values.

With the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) the respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 years
Survival Rate
Time Frame: 2 years

Evaluation of the survival rate for Insignia™ Hip Stem is defined as absence of femoral stem revision for aseptic loosening or device-related femoral fracture

Success rate at two (2) years postoperative with the Insignia™ Hip Stem is not worse than 98 % with a non-inferiority margin of 3.5%.

Success rate at 10 years postoperative with the Insignia™ Hip Stem is not worse than 95% with a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 2, 2034

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 2, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

Subscribe