The Effect of Hypoxia on Type 2 Diabetes and Weight Loss

December 6, 2024 updated by: Ant Shepherd, University of Portsmouth

The Effects of Repeated Moderate Overnight Normobaric Hypoxia on Glucose Homeostasis, Appetite, Body Weight, Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The number of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) continuing to rise, this pandemic is expected to reach 700 million people by 2045. T2DM is a metabolic condition characterized by progressive insulin resistance and chronic hyperglycemia (high blood glucose concentrations). Hyperglycaemia increases the risk of both micro- and macrovascular damage, whilst interventions that reduce blood glucose mitigate this risk. Weight loss, achieved through exercise and dietary modification, is effective at reducing hyperglycaemia. However, despite the clear benefits of exercise and weight loss, diverse psychological, sociological and logistical factors can make it difficult for some individuals with T2DM to initiate, or adhere to, these lifestyle interventions. Alternative approaches to treatment are therefore required.

The purpose of this research project is to investigate whether 10-days of overnight exposure to moderate hypoxia is effective at improving blood glucose control in individuals with T2DM and to provide insight into the physiological mechanisms responsible for any beneficial effects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a metabolic condition characterized by progressive insulin resistance and chronic hyperglycemia (high blood glucose concentrations). Hyperglycaemia increases the risk of both micro- and macrovascular damage, whilst interventions that reduce blood glucose mitigate this risk. Weight loss, achieved through exercise and dietary modification, is effective at reducing hyperglycaemia. However, despite the clear benefits of exercise and weight loss, diverse psychological, sociological and logistical factors can make it difficult for some individuals with T2DM to initiate, or adhere to, these lifestyle interventions. With the number of people with T2DM continuing to rise, this pandemic is expected to reach 700 million people by 2045. Thus, there is a clear need for cost-effective interventions that can effectively improve glycaemic control in people with T2DM and which people will adhere to.

A simple exposure to a lowered concentration of inspired oxygen (i.e. hypoxia) may represent such an intervention. In addition to the beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis that have been reported following a single acute hypoxic exposure, repeated intermittent, or continuous, hypoxic exposure may also have therapeutic potential in individuals with T2DM. In rodent models, daily hypoxic exposures returned fasting blood [glucose] to normal levels and increased glucose transporter 4 translocation in mice with T2DM. Similar effects on glucose homeostasis have been shown in overweight humans and those with insulin resistance, (during intermittent hypoxic training) which was explained, at least in part, by reduction in body mass (~ 1.2 kg).

The mechanisms underpinning the improved glycaemic control in response to hypoxia are likely multifactorial. Specifically, our objective is to assess a novel therapeutic intervention for the treatment and management of T2DM which overcomes many of the barriers to uptake and adherence that are associated with some lifestyle interventions such as exercise and weight loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hampshire
      • Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom, PO1 2ER
        • Anthony Shepherd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and post-menopausal women with T2DM (as diagnosed with the WHO criteria).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with contraindications to hypoxic exposure (e.g. obstructive sleep apnoea, extant cardiac conditions or on medications such as SGLT2 inhibitors or PPAR antagonists).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypoxia 15% O2
Participants will sleep in a tent for 10 nights in hypoxia.
Participants will spend 10 consecutive nights of sleeping in a tent
Sham Comparator: Sham (room air) 21% 02
Participants will sleep in a tent for 10 nights in normoxia.
Participants will spend 10 consecutive nights of sleeping in a tent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Δ Mean AUC (Area Under the Curve) Plasma [Glucose]
Time Frame: Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Does 10 days of overnight hypoxia change AUC during a oral glucose tolerance test. Units for AUC are AU (arbitrary units) which have been derived from the trapezoidal method and have been published as such. Trapezoidal method: AUC = Δx ((y0/2)+y1+y2+y3+...+(yn/2)).

Due to the study design being a randomised crossover control trial, the results for visits 2 and 3, and, 4 and 5, have been unrandomized into the delta of pre-post hypoxia and sham interventions. Visits 2 and 4 represent baseline compared to visit 3 and 5 respectively.

Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Δ Body Mass
Time Frame: Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Does 10 days of overnight hypoxia change body mass - assessed via DXA.

Due to the study design being a randomised crossover control trial, the results for visits 2 and 3, and, 4 and 5, have been unrandomized into the delta of pre-post hypoxia and sham interventions. Visits 2 and 4 represent baseline compared to visit 3 and 5 respectively.

Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.
Δ Total Minutes of Physical Activity (Light, Moderate, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity).
Time Frame: Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Does 10 days of overnight hypoxia change physical activity - assessed via wrist worn accelerometry.

Due to the study design being a randomised crossover control trial, the results for visits 2 and 3, and, 4 and 5, have been unrandomized into the delta of pre-post hypoxia and sham interventions. Visits 2 and 4 represent baseline compared to visit 3 and 5 respectively.

Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.
Δ Sleep Efficiency (Percentage of Time Spent Asleep While in Bed)
Time Frame: Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Does 10 days of overnight hypoxia change sleep - assessed via wrist worn accelerometry.

Due to the study design being a randomised crossover control trial, the results for visits 2 and 3, and, 4 and 5, have been unrandomized into the delta of pre-post hypoxia and sham interventions. Visits 2 and 4 represent baseline compared to visit 3 and 5 respectively.

Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.
Δ IL-6
Time Frame: Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Does 10 days of overnight hypoxia change IL-6.

Due to the study design being a randomised crossover control trial, the results for visits 2 and 3, and, 4 and 5, have been unrandomized into the delta of pre-post hypoxia and sham interventions. Visits 2 and 4 represent baseline compared to visit 3 and 5 respectively.

Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.
Δ TNFɑ
Time Frame: Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Does 10 days of overnight hypoxia change TNFɑ.

Due to the study design being a randomised crossover control trial, the results for visits 2 and 3, and, 4 and 5, have been unrandomized into the delta of pre-post hypoxia and sham interventions. Visits 2 and 4 represent baseline compared to visit 3 and 5 respectively.

Assessed on all outcome visits (2,3,4&5) across an 8 week period. Δ from pre-post hypoxia visits are calculated and compared to Δ from pre-post sham visits.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Shepherd, PhD, University of Portsmouth

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The individual data set that is used for statistical analysis will be uploaded to our university repository and a DOI added to the paper upon publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon publication - no plan to remove.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Dataset is open access from the URL below.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Sleeping in a tent

Subscribe