Muscle Dysfunction in Patients With Haematological Diseases

August 5, 2025 updated by: Jan Christensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The Prevalence and the Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia Among Patients With Haematological Cancer Diseases - A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients diagnosed with hematological cancer diseases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Some patients diagnosed with malignant hematological diseases are faced with poor prognosis and thus must undergo a demanding course of treatment associated with severe deconditioning potentially leading to worse prognostic outcomes. It is currently not well-described, to what extend patients body composition at the point of diagnoses should be part of standard clinical evaluation in order to optimize therapy-efficacy. Recent findings suggest that pathophysiological alterations in skeletal muscle mass and function can have significant implications for the risk of disease progression and long-term prognosis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

216

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with malignant lymphomas, acute leukaemia and multiple myeloma referred to treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients diagnosed with malignant lymphomas, acute leukaemia and multiple myeloma referred to treatment at the Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age: <18
  • Pregnancy
  • Physical or mental disabilities precluding test of muscle function
  • Inability to read and understand Danish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cohort I - Patients newly diagnosed with malignant lymphoma (n=72)
These patients will undergo two assessments: A baseline-assessment prior to treatment for the hematologic cancer disease and a follow-up assessment at 6 months after treatment start
Cohort II - Patients newly diagnosed with acute leukaemia (n=72)
These patients will undergo two assessments: A baseline-assessment prior to treatment for the hematologic cancer disease and a follow-up assessment at 6 months after treatment start
Cohort III - Patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma (n=72)
These patients will undergo two assessments: A baseline-assessment prior to treatment for the hematologic cancer disease and a follow-up assessment at 6 months after treatment start

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Whole body Lean body Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization duration
Time Frame: 1 year post treatment
Total number days in hospital
1 year post treatment
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 1 year post treatment
Risk of disease progression
1 year post treatment
Overall survival
Time Frame: 1 year post treatment
Risk of mortality from any-cause
1 year post treatment
Change in appendicular lean mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 after treatment start
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Baseline and 6 after treatment start
Change in whole body fat percentage
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in visceral fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in bone mineral density
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in bone mineral content
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in walking capacity
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Maximum 10 meter walking speed
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in lower body physical function
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
30 seconds Sit-To-Stand test
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in maximum leg power
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Leg extensor power test (Nottingham Power Rig)
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in hand grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Maximum strength test by handgrip dynamometer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in inflammation markers
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Blood values are registered from the patients hospital record in relation to assessments. C-reactive protein (CRP) and leucocytes are registered as they are inflammation markers.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in creatinine
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Blood values are registered from the patients hospital record in relation to assessments. Creatinine is registered due to their relation to muscle strength..
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Blood values are registered from the patients hospital record in relation to assessments. Hemoglobin is registered due to their relation to muscle strength.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in body fat percentage
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in fat mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in fat-free mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in muscle mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in bone mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in total body water
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of LifeQuestionnaire, Version 3.0 Scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
Change in physical activity level
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment start
The International Physical Activity Questionnaires, short form. The Questionnaires covers the frequency and duration of vigorous, moderate, and walking activities over the last 7 days, as well as a single-item question on weekday sitting. Using the instrument's scoring protocol, total weekly physical activity can be calculated to three levels of physical activity and the interpretation of the questionnaire can be categorized in low, moderate and high physical activity, based on the stated time and Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METs min/week) used in different types of activities.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment start

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Not provided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Subscribe