Study of Combined VisioCyt Test and FGFR3 Mutations on a Urinary Sample to Diagnose Bladder Tumors (URODX-FGFR3)

July 21, 2025 updated by: Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

Evaluation of a Urine Analysis Combining VisioCyt® Automated Cytology and FGFR3 Mutations for the Detection of Bladder Cancer

This study is a case-control, propsective and muticentric clinical trial, which aim to compare the specificity and sensibility of VisioCyt urinary cytological test combined with FGFR3 mutation detection test to VisioCyt urinary cyological test on its own to detect bladder cancer.

The case are patient in whom newly diagnosed, or recurring /progressing bladder cancer is strongly suspected after initial fibroscopy.

The control are patient attending or hospitalized for urolithiasis, urinary infections, urinary superior excretory stones or with non suspect urinary symptomatology.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

190

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54519
        • Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

BOTH GROUPS

  • M/F
  • Patient agrees to follow study protocol and is able to follow study procedures
  • Patient signed, dated and understood consent form
  • Patient has a social security scheme

CASE GROUP

  • Patient is 18 or older
  • Patient for whom a bladder cancer recently diagnosed, or backsliding/progression is heavily suspected after the initial fibroscopy
  • Patient who hasn't started systemic/oral/radiotheurapeutic pelvic treatment for his/her tumor

CONTROL GROUP

  • Patient between 18 and 45 y/o
  • Patient not suspected of having any bladder cancer
  • Patient attending or hospitalized for urolithiasis, urinary infections, superior excretory stones or with non suspect urinary symptomatology
  • Patient who hasn't been exposed to bladder carcinogens (tobacco, industrial carcinogen (ex: coal tar, tar/coal oils, coal pitch and burning coal soot), urinary bilharzia, chemotherapy exposition (cyclophosphamid)
  • Patient that had a negative cytopathological exploration of the excretory urinary route OR/AND iconography (pelvic echography, pelvic scanner) OR/AND endoscopy with prior urinary sample
  • Patient unscathed of any cancer that might interact with bladder cancer : uterine cancer, prostate cancer, rectal cancer, and metastasis from other cancer or non-urologic tumor invading the bladder

EXCLUSION CRITERIA BOTH GROUPS

  • Non-treated current urinary infection
  • Patient with another pelvic cancer
  • Bladder cancer outside of urothelial carcinoma
  • Associated carcinoma of the high urinary apparatus
  • Patient that received renal transplantation (BK virus)
  • Patient that received pelvis radiotherapy (related to prostatic cancer, gynecologic cancer or pelvic digestive cancer)
  • Patient having a JJ catheter
  • Refused to signed consent
  • Pregnant, susceptible to be, or breast-feeding women
  • Person Under guardianship
  • Impossibility to submit to medical monitoring because of geographic, social, or mental issues

CASE GROUP • Under 18y/o

CONTROL GROUP

• Under 18y/o or above 45 y/o

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Case
Patient in whom newly diagnosed, or recurring / progressing bladder cancer is strongly suspected after initial fibroscopy
Urine collection will be tacken at inclusion. The sample will be thereafter separate into three to realise different analyzes (standard cytology, Visiocyt test, FGFR3 analysis)
Blood sample will be tacken at inclusion, ONLY for "case" patients that agreed upon this. This sample will be addition to the collection for further research.
Experimental: Control
Patient attending or hospitalized for urolithiasis, urinary infections, superior excretory stones or with non suspect urinary symptomatology
Urine collection will be tacken at inclusion. The sample will be thereafter separate into three to realise different analyzes (standard cytology, Visiocyt test, FGFR3 analysis)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity
Time Frame: at inclusion
Specificity comparaison between Visiocyt test + FGFR3 analysis and FGFR3 analysis on its own
at inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the 4 different tests
Time Frame: at inclusion

Sensibility Comparaison between :

  1. Visiocyt test + FGFR3 analysis
  2. FGFR3 analysis on its own
  3. Visiocyt test on its own
  4. Standard cytology
at inclusion
Specificity of the 4 different tests
Time Frame: at inclusion

Specificity Comparaison between :

  1. Visiocyt test + FGFR3 analysis
  2. FGFR3 analysis on its own
  3. Visiocyt test on its own
  4. Standard cytology
at inclusion
Positive predictive value of the 4 different tests
Time Frame: at inclusion

Positive predictive value between :

  1. Visiocyt test + FGFR3 analysis
  2. FGFR3 analysis on its own
  3. Visiocyt test on its own
  4. Standard cytology
at inclusion
Negative predictive value of the 4 different tests
Time Frame: at inclusion

Negative predictive value between :

  1. Visiocyt test + FGFR3 analysis
  2. FGFR3 analysis on its own
  3. Visiocyt test on its own
  4. Standard cytology
at inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eschwège Pascal, MD, PhD, Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Urine collection (150ml)

Subscribe