Comparing Number of Injection Sites of In-office Intravesical Onabotulinumtoxin A Treatments for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

December 13, 2021 updated by: Augusta University
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a syndrome characterized by urinary urgency, with or without urinary incontinence, nocturia, and urinary frequency. Intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of neurogenic and idiopathic OAB. Current standard of practice involves 100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA diluted in 10 ml saline cystoscopically injected into approximately 20 different detrusor muscle sites equally distributed along the posterior bladder wall and dome. This treatment was classically done in the operating room under general anesthesia, but now is typically performed in an office setting using local anesthesia (lidocaine) as this is more feasible and tolerable. Patients can experience discomfort and pain with each injection. Evidence has also shown that administering the same dose of onabotulinumtoxinA into fewer injection sites in the detrusor muscle (ranging from 3 to 10) results in equivalent efficacy compared to the current standard. However, it has yet to be determined if there is a significant difference in patient satisfaction and tolerability when the procedure is administered in an office setting using the same dosage with fewer injections. Our study aims to assess whether patient tolerance and satisfaction of intravesicular onabotulinumtoxinA increases with the use of 4 detrusor injections as opposed to 20 injections when performed in an office setting on women with OAB.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • females, adults 18 years of age and older, diagnosed with OAB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bladder pathology including nephrolithiasis, active urinary tract infection, bladder trauma, neurogenic bladder, patients who have previously received intravesical onabotulinumtoxin A injections, pregnant patients, minor patients, male patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental Group
100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA toxin diluted in 10 mL of saline cystoscopically injected into approximately 4 different detrusor muscle sites along the posterior bladder wall and dome.
100 U of Onabotulinumtoxin A diluted in 10 mL of saline injected into the wall of the detrusor muscle at various sites
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Group
100 U of onabotulinumtoxinA toxin diluted in 10 mL of saline cystoscopically injected into approximately 20 different detrusor muscle sites along the posterior bladder wall and dome.
100 U of Onabotulinumtoxin A diluted in 10 mL of saline injected into the wall of the detrusor muscle at various sites

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived pain of each participant before, during, and after the procedure on a scale of 0-10
Time Frame: within the hour prior to initiating the intervention, and immediately at the conclusion of the 30-minute intervention
The Pain Survey is a self-reported instrument used to assess pain before, during, and after a procedure. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
within the hour prior to initiating the intervention, and immediately at the conclusion of the 30-minute intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue of each participant after the procedure
Time Frame: 2 weeks +/- 7 days after procedure and 3 +/- 7 days months after procedure
The Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire is a validated instrument administered by the physician. It asks participants if they had benefit, satisfaction, and a willingness to continue from a specific treatment. If yes, responses range from 1(little benefit, little, satisfaction, a little bit willing) to 2(much benefit, very satisfied, very willing).
2 weeks +/- 7 days after procedure and 3 +/- 7 days months after procedure
Change in extent of Overactive Bladder Symptoms before and after receiving the procedure
Time Frame: Pre procedure, 2 weeks +/- 7 days after procedure, and 3 +/- 7 days months after procedure
The Overactive Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) short form is a validated instrument that measures the extent to which participants have various symptoms of OAB over the past 4 weeks. The responses range from 1(not at all) to 6(a very great deal).
Pre procedure, 2 weeks +/- 7 days after procedure, and 3 +/- 7 days months after procedure
The Prevalence of complications with botox after receiving the procedure
Time Frame: 2 weeks +/- 7 days after procedure, and 3 +/- 7 days months after procedure
The Complications with Botox survey is an instrument used to measure if and how many times participants experienced UTIs, difficulty urinating, or hematuria after the Botox procedure. Participants self-report the number of times if they have experienced the side effect.
2 weeks +/- 7 days after procedure, and 3 +/- 7 days months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Lanzer, MD, Augusta University
  • Study Director: Emily Grandprey, DO, Augusta University
  • Study Director: Emily Lluch, Augusta University
  • Study Director: Ahana Gaurav, Augusta University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on OnabotulinumtoxinA

Subscribe