Oral Hygiene Intervention for Adolescents

June 20, 2023 updated by: Tracy L Finlayson, San Diego State University

Project Motivate Me Clinical Trial: Oral Hygiene Intervention for Adolescents

The purpose of this study is to promote oral hygiene behaviors (toothbrushing, flossing) and oral health with high-risk adolescents in San Diego, CA, through a Motivational Interviewing (MI) Intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the efficacy of a new, brief motivational interviewing (MI)- based intervention and assess its impact on several sets of outcomes among 14-19 years old Latino adolescents: clinical oral health and hygiene indices, counts of biological caries-causing bacteria, and oral hygiene behaviors. Three one-on-one, half hour educational and skill-building MI sessions will address: proper oral hygiene technique, bacteria and dental caries process, and nutrition. Intervention group adolescents will also receive three telephone calls (one/month reinforcing their hygiene behavior goals. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline (T1), and at one-month (T2), after the intervention group received three MI sessions and three booster calls.

Aim 1. To develop and assess a new Motivational Interviewing (MI)-based behavioral oral health intervention for Latino adolescents in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. Finalize all intervention educational materials and scripts and assessment tools.

Aim 2. To assess the efficacy of the brief intervention on reductions in clinically determined outcomes among intervention versus control participants.

Aim 3. To assess the efficacy of the brief intervention on reductions in the presence and count of two types of biological bacteria involved in the dental caries disease process.

Aim 4. To assess the efficacy of the brief intervention in increasing the frequency of daily oral hygiene behaviors, including properly brushing, flossing, and rinsing.

Aim 5. Conduct process evaluation via two focus groups post-intervention to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and assessments (one for intervention group; one for control group).

The investigators hypothesize that the intervention group will see improved clinical outcomes, lower bacteria counts, and better oral hygiene behavior than the control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Vista, California, United States, 92084
        • Vista Community Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • self identifies as Mexican or Mexican-American
  • living in Northern San Diego County
  • speaks English
  • able to access stable internet
  • participates in 1 or more program or service at VCC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational Interviewing and Assessments
Two 1 hour assessments. At each assessment, participant will complete a survey, supply a saliva sample, do a toothpick test, and take a plaque photo. Three one-on-one, half hour educational and skill-building MI sessions will address: proper oral hygiene technique, bacteria and dental caries process, and nutrition. Intervention group adolescents will also receive three calls over one month reinforcing their hygiene behavior goals.
Intervention will include 3 one-on-one motivational interviewing sessions and 3 follow-up calls with a trained MI health educator. These sessions aim to promote better oral hygiene and oral health.
No Intervention: Assessments Only
Two 1 hour assessments. At each assessment, participant will complete a survey, supply a saliva sample, do a toothpick test, and take a plaque photo.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Plaque Score at 1 month
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention (after about one month)
Plaque levels will be scored for each participant based on photographs taken after the use of a plaque disclosure tablet. This will be scored as low (minimum), moderate, or high (maximum). Lower is better.
At baseline and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline in Gum Bleeding at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Each participant will use a toothpick to probe 14 points in the mouth (7 points in the maxillary anterior teeth and 7 points in the mandibular anterior teeth). At each point, if the participant bleeds, they are given a score of "1". Then the score is added up at the end of probing each point. Minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 14. Lower score is better and higher score is worse.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline Weekly Toothbrushing at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Each participant will self-report frequency of toothbrushing in the past 7 days on a survey. This will be scored as a continuous count (minimum is zero, no set maximum) and whether or not they met ADA recommended guidelines for twice daily brushing. Higher frequency is better.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline in Weekly Flossing at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Each participant will self-report frequency of flossing in the last 7 days on a survey. This will be scored as a continuous count (minimum is zero, no set maximum) and whether or not they met ADA recommended guidelines for once daily flossing. Higher frequency is better.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline in Weekly Rinsing at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Each participant will self-report frequency of rinsing with water in the last 7 days on a survey. This will be scored as a continuous count (minimum is zero, no set maximum). Higher frequency is better.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline Oral Hygiene at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Each participant's oral hygiene skill level will be assessed and scored as poor (minimum), fair, good, or excellent (maximum) based on execution of specific micro-behaviors for brushing and flossing. Higher is better.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline Count in S. Mutans Bacteria in Saliva at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Saliva samples will be collected using Zymo collection kits to run qPCR analysis, which will yield information on whether or not bacteria is present (yes/no), and relative and absolute counts of S. mutans bacteria. Minimum is zero, no set maximum. Lower is better.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Change from Baseline Count in S. sobrinus Bacteria in Saliva at 1 month.
Time Frame: at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)
Saliva samples will be collected using Zymo collection kits to run qPCR analysis, which will yield information on whether or not bacteria is present (yes/no), and relative and absolute counts of S. sobrinus bacteria. Minimum is zero, no set maximum. Lower is better.
at baseline, and post-intervention (after about one month)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tracy L Finlayson, PhD, San Diego State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HS-2021-0276

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Hygiene

Clinical Trials on Motivational Interviewing

Subscribe