Peer Comparison Feedback to Providers to Improve Hypertension Control

June 1, 2026 updated by: University of Pennsylvania
As part of a roll out of new payment model for physicians based on hypertension control, the investigators will evaluate a monthly peer comparison message to Primary Care Providers at Penn Medicine Lancaster to see whether provider engagement with patients' overall hypertension management increases, as measured by new or increasing doses of anti-hypertensive medications.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hypertension (HTN) affects about 30% of US adults, and effective treatment that reduces long-term risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease is widely available; however, only about half of adults maintain good control. HTN control requires diagnosis, initiation of treatment, adherence to medications, and titration of medications. The investigators' prior work from Way2Text and SupportBP showed that there is significant clinical inertia in escalating medications for HTN through increasing dosage or adding new medications.

Prior studies have shown that providing feedback to providers with peer comparison data can leverage social norms to improve evidence-based practices in antibiotic and statin prescribing. Penn Medicine Lancaster General Primary Care is rolling out a Hypertension Control Implementation Plan (HCIP) as an initiative to improve hypertension control through creation of a clinic-based pathway to identify patients with hypertension, appropriately measure blood pressure, and prescribe medications to reduce blood pressure. Busy PCPs have competing demands of care, so there is an opportunity to leverage peer comparison to nudge providers to adhere to the HCIP and intensify medications.

The study design is a stratified parallel-group cluster-randomized trial. PCPs will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by practice, to either: 1) Control: Usual Care- This will include the standard HCIP roll-out, and PCPs can access their HTN control rates using the existing EPIC dashboard.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17602
        • Lancaster General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Care Providers who have at =>30 patients hypertension as determined by the HTN quality metric
  • Patients aged 18-85 with hypertension in their encounter diagnosis within the last 2 years (office visits, ED/Urgent Care, Hospital, Hospital Encounter, and Prenatal Visit)
  • Patients will be counted in the denominator of the quality metric if they have both systolic and diastolic BP measures from an encounter with their PCP department within the last year (including office visits, well child, prenatal visit, consult visit, confidential, e-visit, nursing only, home/offsite visit, and telemedicine) that is >140 for systolic BP and >90 diastolic BP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary Care Providers includes providers with <30 patients in the HTN quality metric
  • Patients will be excluded if they are 66 and older with a frailty diagnosis and those with an advanced illness diagnosis within the past year; 81 and older with frailty diagnosis within the past year
  • It also excludes patients with end stage renal disease (indicated by evaluation of the GFR, diagnosis of end stage renal disease in last year, dialysis received in last year, or renal transplant) and patients with a pregnancy diagnosis in the last 9 months
  • It also excludes patients with an end of life indicator (comfort care encounter in last year, comfort care noted in problem list in last year, and comfort care/palliative care procedures in last year)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
This group will not receive peer comparison messages and will continue with usual care.
Experimental: Intervention
This group will receive peer comparison messages.

In addition to usual care, PCPs will receive a monthly report as an EPIC in basket message describing what category they are in:

  1. If HTN control rate <50th percentile, PCP is told they are below median
  2. If HTN control rate is between 50-89th percentile , PCP is told they are below top performer
  3. If HTN control rate is between 90-100th percentile, PCP is told they are a high performer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in new hypertensive medication prescriptions or an increased dose of hypertensive medication
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in new hypertensive medication prescriptions or an increased dose of hypertensive medication from baseline to the follow up period, as measured by the proportion of patients with a new prescription or dose placed for hypertensive medications in the electronic health record (EHR) from baseline to follow-up
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hypertension control percentage
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in hypertension control percentage from baseline to follow up period, as measured by percentage increases in a hypertension quality improvement report that is provided to physicians in the electronic health record (EHR) and reflects rate of hypertension control across all patients under the care of that physician.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shivan Mehta, MD,MBA,MSHP, University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 849584

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Peer Comparison Message

Subscribe