Clinical Practice Guidelines and Impact of Audit and Feedback in the Emergency Department

February 1, 2017 updated by: Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Impact of Audit and Feedback in the Emergency Department

This study will develop and test an intervention given to emergency medicine providers to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for pneumonia and sepsis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be performed at Denver Health Medical Center, a 477-bed urban, safety-net, acute-care hospital located in Denver, Colorado. The adult ED is staffed by board-certified emergency physicians at all times. These physicians supervise the care of all patients being managed by resident physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and medical students. Approximately 430 patients are admitted to the hospital from the ED each year with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and severe sepsis (SS).

Adherence to CPGs will be measured at the level of the attending emergency physician. All employed, attending emergency physicians working clinically in the adult ED at Denver Health Medical Center at the start of the study will be included.

The investigators will use a step-wedge design to randomize physicians into clusters. Randomization of physicians into clusters and randomization of clusters to intervention timing will occur one week prior to delivery of the intervention to cluster one. he intervention will consist of monthly audit and feedback on adherence to CPGs for CAP and SS. Once a cluster enters its first intervention month, all physicians in that cluster will receive an email detailing their adherence to both CAP and SS CPG for every month since the start of the study. Adherence to the entire CPG as well as each component of the CPG will be provided. In addition, physicians will be shown the median prevalence of adherence for all physicians as well as where their adherence ranks among their physician group. Lastly, in a separate secure email, physicians will be given patient identifiers (i.e., name, MRN, date of visit) for each patient that received non-adherent care and will be told which component of care was not adherent to the respective CPG so that they can review the case themselves, if desired.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Attending emergency medicine physicians working clinically in the Adult Emergency Department at Denver Health Medical Center at the start of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None. All eligible physicians will be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Pre-Intervention
Delayed feedback and peer comparison
Experimental: Feedback with Peer Comparison
Individualized adherence feedback with peer comparison
Email detailing adherence to CAP and SS CPG for every month since start of study. Physicians will be provided individualized feedback and given patient identifiers for each patient that received non-adherent care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Adherence to Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Severe Sepsis Clinical Practice Guidelines
Time Frame: 30 days post-intervention and 60 days post-intervention
Adherence will be determined via chart review of patients and will be measured by concordance with published clinical practice guidelines
30 days post-intervention and 60 days post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stacy Trent, MD, Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock, Septic

Clinical Trials on Feedback with Peer Comparison

3
Subscribe