Clinial Application of Park et al.(The Knee 27 (2020) 1577-1584)'s Study

June 22, 2023 updated by: Ji Yeong Kim, Gangnam Severance Hospital

Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation to the Modified Ablation Points for Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: Preliminary Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of this study was to perform pulsed radiofrequency ablation with a modified target suggested in the cadaver study by Park et al. (The Knee 27 (2020) 1577-1584) on knee osteoarthritis patients, and to evaluate the effect of reducing the frequency of intravascular injection and reducing pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. chronic knee pain that does not respond to conservative treatment (physiotherapy, oral analgesic, steroid intra-articular injection, Hyruan injection) for more than 6 months
  2. A score of 6 or higher (out of 10) on the target knee's numerical rating scale
  3. Knee osteoarthritis 1-4 confirmed in knee X ray within 6 months of study enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatic diseases
  2. uncontrolled diabetes
  3. malignant tumor
  4. If the target knee has a previous surgical history (arthroscopy, arthroscopy, autologous or allograft osteochondral transplantation and autologous cartilage cell transplantation, osteotomy, arthritis surgery)
  5. Patients with lidocaine and contrast agent allergy
  6. history of nerve block in the target knee within 2 weeks
  7. Body mass index over 40 kg/m2
  8. bleeding disorder
  9. Pregnant/lactating women
  10. Inability to understand informed consent and respond to research questionnaires due to cognitive impairment
  11. Unable to read consent form (e.g. illiterate, foreigner, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: pulsed radiofrequency ablation to modified points group
pulsed radiofrequency ablation aimed at the adjusted target point of Park et al. under C-arm guidance
Point 1 place 10mm higher than the boundary between Femur's medial epicondyle and shaft. The 2nd point is targeted 20mm above the patella. Point 3 is targeted 10mm above the femur lateral epicondyle and shaft boundary. At point 4, find the boundary position between the tibia epicondyle and the shaft in the AP view and move it superolateral by 10 mm to target the central part of the medial shaft of the tibia and perform the main touch. Point 5 targets the center of the fibular head.
Active Comparator: pulsed radiofrequency ablation to conventional points group
pulsed radiofrequency ablation aimed at conventional target point under C-arm guidance
Under AP view X-ray fluoroscopy, enter the cannula into the tunnel view until reaching the bone, reaching the border of the shaft and epicondyle, then stop the cannula tip at the anterior 2/3 junction in the lateral view. A total of three target points are the boundary position between the femur medial epicondyle and the shaft, the boundary position between the femur lateral epicondyle and the shaft, and the boundary position between the tibia meidal epiconcyle and the shaft. Subsequent procedure will be proceed same as Arm 1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate at which vascular uptake is confirmed when the first contrast agent is given after the needle is positioned at the target point
Time Frame: during the ablation procedure
Whether vascular uptake is confirmed on the x-ray image is a binary response.
during the ablation procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numeric rating score
Time Frame: Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
A score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates maximum pain.
Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
functional status
Time Frame: Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a widely used, proprietary set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints
Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
quality of life
Time Frame: Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
Q-5D is a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic questionnaire for use in clinical and economic appraisal and population health surveys.
Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
medication
Time Frame: Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation
The Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) is an instrument with potential clinical and research applications for quantifying medication regimen use in chronic pain populations.
Before the pulsed radiofrequency ablation, after 4 weeks of the ablaion, after 8 weeks of the ablation, after 12 weeks of the ablation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3-2021-0432

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on pulsed radiofrequency ablation to modifined points group

Subscribe