A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

March 18, 2026 updated by: Daniel Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Video Intervention to Address Pre-Test Patient Education for Tumor Genomic Testing

This clinical trial tests whether a video intervention improves patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in patients with cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Measuring how the video intervention affects patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in patients with metastatic cancer may help doctors provide patient-centered care by effectively communicating the importance of tumor genomic testing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess change in patient knowledge about tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) following exposure to the video.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I.To assess changes following exposure to the video, including; Ia. Genomic knowledge via the validated 10 true/false question survey (% correct out of 10).

Ib. 11-item Trust in Physician Survey (TPS) as a single TPS score. Ic. Comparison of results in three patient cohorts: 1) Metastatic breast cancer; 2) lung cancer; 3) metastatic cancer of unspecified type.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. Assess whether therapies prescribed as a result of tumor NGS achieved clinically favorable result through chart review.

OUTLINE:

Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

243

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • Lima, Ohio, United States, 45801
        • St. Rita's
      • Richmond, Ohio, United States, 23222
        • Saint Francis Medical Center
      • Youngstown, Ohio, United States, 44504
        • Saint Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have biopsy-confirmed metastatic cancer
  • Be >= 18 years of age
  • Be undergoing clinical tumor or circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) NGS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclude patients who are not English- or Spanish-speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health services research (video)
Patients participate in a video intervention session and complete questionnaires at baseline, after participating in the video intervention, and after receiving NGS results.
Complete questionnaires
Participate in a video intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Message-specific Knowledge/Recall Accuracy
Time Frame: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Measured as percentage correct out of 10 questions. Will have 90% power to detect an effect size of 0.47 in change of recall accuracy from pre- to post- video intervention, using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with alpha of 0.05.
At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Genomic Knowledge
Time Frame: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Measured with the validated 10 true/false question survey that measure objective knowledge of genes/genetics (% correct out of 10). Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Patient Trust of Physician/Provider
Time Frame: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Measured with the 11-item trust in physician/provider survey (TIPP). The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater trust in physician/provider. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Change in Patient Genomic Knowledge in Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Versus Metastatic Lung Cancer (MLC) Patients
Time Frame: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Measured with the validated 10 true/false question survey (% correct out of 10). . Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Will be compared between MBC and MLC patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test.
At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Change in Patient Trust of Physician/Provider in MBC Versus MLC Patients
Time Frame: At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)
Measured with the 11-item trust in physician/provider survey (TIPP). The survey uses a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater trust in physician/provider.. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared pre-/post-video using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Will be compared between MBC and MLC patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test.
At T1 (baseline), at T2 (within 27-days of baseline, all following video viewing and on the same date as video viewing), and at T3 (Up to 288 days after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel G Stover, MD, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 27, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IVA Lung Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe