The Specificity, Sensitivity and Clinical Correlation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA in Detecting AChR and MuSK IgG of Myasthenia Gravis

January 17, 2023 updated by: Fu-Dong Shi, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Comparison of the Specificity, Sensitivity and Clinical Correlation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA Assay in Detecting AChR and MuSK IgG of Myasthenia Gravis: a National Multicenter Study

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorder mediated by autoantibodies against AChR, MuSK or other autoantigens located at the post synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Presence of autoantibodies specific for AChR or MuSK can establish diagnosis in conjunction with clinical presentations. In most established guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis, determination of AChR and MuSK antibodies has been recommended. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and cell-based assay (CBA) are all commercially available and have been adopted for autoantibody detection by most referring neurologists. At present, specificity and sensitivity of these methods have not been compared in large cohorts within a context of stringent quality control. As a consequence, there are no national or international consensus regarding selection of methods and interpretation of results, resulting in challenges to neurologists managing these patients. To this end, the investigators proposed to conduct a multicenter, double-blind, prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CBA, RIPA and ELISA assays to detect AChR and MuSK antibodies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants: patients with suspected MG

Aim: the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation of AChR and MuSK IgG detection through the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA methods.

Study design: A multicenter, double-blind, prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CBA, RIPA, and ELISA assays in detecting AChR and MuSK antibodies.

Total enrollment: 3000 patients with suspected MG will be enrolled.

Time frame: The enrollment time of this trial is 21 months, and the entire study period is about 24 months.

Reagent resource: 1. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody RIA kit: RSR limited, recommended cut-off value=0.5 nmol/L.

2. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody CBA kit: Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd; recommended cut-off value =1:10.

3. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody ELISA kit: RSR limited; recommended cut-off value=0.45 nmol/L.

4. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase RIA kit: RSR limited, recommended cut-off value =0.05 nmol/L.

5. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase CBA kit: Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd; recommended cut-off value =1:10.

6. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase ELISA kit: IBL, recommended cut-off value=0.4 U/ml.

Groups: The samples were divided into 3 groups according to the detected methods: CBA group, RIPA group and ELISA group.

Study protocol: 1. When patients suspected of MG matched up with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the serum sample of each patient would be divided into equal aliquots and randomly assigned to the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA testing laboratories for detection.

2. All patient's information will be masked and monitored by members of ethics committees. Serum specimens from participants will be renumbered without any clinical information before doing the tests to be investigated. According to the standard procedure of kits, the operator in laboratories to perform the CBA, ELISA, or RIPA will complete the detection of AChR and MuSK antibodies of the enrolled participants' serum, and record the original value, control, or reference value.

3. Each MG center will provide the clinical diagnosis results of the enrolled patients, treatment and follow up information of the participants. The diagnosis of MG and the tests to be investigated will be double blindly done.

4. The data statistics, analysis, and summary of the project are operated by an independent third-party statistic team.

Evaluation indicators: Evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation of AChR and MuSK IgG detection through the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA methods.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2663

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
      • Tianjin, China, 30000
        • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 90 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with suspected MG, 1-90 years of age.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with compatible clinical features of weakness of skeletal muscles, including ptosis, diplopia, dysphonia, dysphagia, or limb weakness.
  • Patients need to do the diagnosis of MG, requiring serum autoantibody, electrophysiological, pharmacological neostigmine test, thymic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), etc in the diagnostic evaluation of MG.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncertain diagnoses or incomplete clinical data for data analysis.
  • Patients with abnormal serum samples, such as hemolysis or lipemia, which will affect the detection base value and the final interpretation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cell Based Assay (CBA)
Use AChR/MuSK Ab CBA Kit (Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd, China) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis
Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis
Other Names:
  • ELISA Assay
  • RIPA Assay
RIPA Assay
Use AChR and MuSK Ab radioimmunoassay kit (RSR Limited, UK) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis
Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis
Other Names:
  • ELISA Assay
  • RIPA Assay
ELISA Assay
Use AChR Ab ELISA Kit (RSR Limited, UK) and MuSK ELISA kit (IBL Limited, Germany) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis
Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis
Other Names:
  • ELISA Assay
  • RIPA Assay

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparsion of the specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation
Time Frame: 24 months
Comparsion the specificity,sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To verify the differences of specificity and sensitivity in CBA and CBA-TSA assay
Time Frame: 8 months
Analyzing the advantage of CBA-TSA in detecting the AChR or MuSK IgG in low abundance and low affinity.
8 months
To confirm the function of AChR subunits in detecting clustered AChR IgG
Time Frame: 8 months
To verify the binding function of AChR subunits in AChR antibody through the CBA assay.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Fu-Dong Shi, MD, Ph.D, Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Detection Autoantibody of Myasthenia Gravis

Clinical Trials on CBA Assay

Subscribe