The Application of the Transtheoretical Model to the Frailty Elderly in the Community

September 28, 2022 updated by: Chia Jung Hsieh, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

Application of the Transtheoretical Model to Physical Activity and Health-related Quality of Life Among the Frailty of the Community Elderly

As the age structure shows an aging population while facing physical and mental changes among the frailty of the community elderly. Researchers have successively adopted exercise and nutrition strategies for the frail elderly in the community, to improve their physical function, prevent frailty and increase independent functions. There were researches using technology to improve the physical function of the elderly in the community. The transtheoretical model was a comprehensive model of intentional behavior change that incorporates process-oriented variables to explain and predict how and when the elderly change their health behavior including the elderly adoption healthy behavior. Therefore, the investigators use the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) to design the "Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors" for participants. From improving physical activity and quality of life, then improving the frailty and restoring overall health.

The research will be a quasi-experimental design. It is expected to invite 84 frailty elderly from the Community-Based Care Center (42 in the experimental group and 42 in the control group). The investigators use the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) as the framework, which includes physical activity training, nutrition education- nursing Information, home-based training, and telecare group care, develop the "Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors" for 6 months. The primary outcome includes cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty criteria, short physical performance battery (SPPB), grip strength, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ), and SF-12. The secondary outcome includes BMI, upper arm and calf circumference to measure nutritional status, short from falls efficacy scale international (FES-I), the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). The investigator will follow the outcome before the intervention, the third month after the intervention, and the sixth month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed with a generalized estimation equation model of SPSS version 22. Make the participants develop a habit of physical activity combined with a nutritious diet. Let the elderly reduce frail state, increase physical activity, improve health-related quality of life and improve health-related results.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The ageing population of the world is an irreversible international situation because of the rapidly increasing number of elderly populations in the 21st century. As the age structure shows an aging population while facing physical and mental changes among the frailty of the community elderly. Helping them prevent disability and promote health has become the focus of current care. Researchers have successively adopted exercise and nutrition strategies for the frail elderly in the community, to improve their physical function, prevent frailty and increase independent functions. The internet was a simple and fast model to care elderly in the community. There were researches using technology to improve the physical function of the elderly in the community. The transtheoretical model was a comprehensive model of intentional behavior change that incorporates process-oriented variables to explain and predict how and when the elderly change their health behavior including the elderly adoption healthy behavior. Therefore, the investigators use the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) to design the "Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors" for participants, which includes Home-Based physical activity training, nutrition education, and telecare technology. The investigator use the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) to analyze the behavior change process of the participants and to explore important factors during the intervention. From improving physical activity and quality of life, then improving the frailty and restoring overall health.

The research will be a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. It is expected to invite 84 frailty elderly from Community-Based Care Center in Shilin Districts in Taipei City, Taiwan (42 in the experimental group and 42 in the control group). The investigators use the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) as the framework, which includes physical activity training, nutrition education-nursing Information, home-based training, and telecare group care, developing the "Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors" for 6 months for community-dwelling frail older adults. The participants create motivation to start execution through physical activity and nutritional knowledge and provide the experimental group with online home-based training from the three different stages of TTM behavior change. During the intervention period, the investigators will follow the adherence, satisfaction, behavior change stage every month. The investigators use motivation to improve the self-efficacy of the participants and achieve the result of behavior change. Finally, support the frail participants to enter the maintenance phase. The primary outcome includes frailty status (cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty criteria), Physical Activity (short physical performance battery (SPPB), grip strength, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ)), and Health-related Quality of Life (SF-12). The secondary outcome includes kinanthropometric measures (BMI, upper arm, and calf circumference to measure nutritional status), short from falls efficacy scale international (FES-I), the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). The investigators will follow the outcome before the intervention, the third month after the intervention, and the sixth month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed with a generalized estimation equation model of SPSS version 22. The research hopes to promote the health of the frailty participants through FANS in the community. Make the participants develop a habit of physical activity combined with a nutritious diet. Let the participants reduce frail state, increase physical activity, improve health-related quality of life and improve health-related results, and have a healthy life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shilin Districts
      • Taipei, Shilin Districts, Taiwan, 111
        • Recruiting
        • Zhiwuyuan and Fujia Community-Based Care Center
        • Contact:
          • Chunmin Liao, Undertaker
          • Phone Number: +886 228342158
        • Contact:
          • Wenzong Xiao, Undertaker
          • Phone Number: +886 228350489

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 99 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥65 years old
  2. classified as prefrail or frail stage by the Cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty criteria.
  3. Conscious clear and can comply with study procedures.
  4. Have a device that enables online communication, and having the ability to operate this device. (Experimental group)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed as unsuitable for physical activity with high risk of acute and chronic diseases, such as neurological impairment, severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, persistent joint pain, or severe musculoskeletal impairment or severe musculoskeletal injury, joint or lower extremity surgery within 6 months.
  2. severe visual impairment
  3. institutionalization
  4. Participated in physical activity or nutrition interventional six months ago

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors
"Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors" includes physical activity training, nutrition education- nursing Information, home-based training, and telecare group care (including APP assistance)

"Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors" uses the Trans-Theoretical Model (TTM) as the framework, which includes physical activity training, nutrition education- nursing Information, home-based training, and telecare group care (including APP assistance).

Physical activity training comprised muscle training, joint strengthening, and upper and lower limb resistance exercises for older adults who were frail. After administering nutrition education- nursing Information, participants were encouraged to set their own goals to improve their diet. Home-based training and telecare group care depends on the stages of TTM behavior change of the elderly.

No Intervention: wait-list
Routine care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Basic Demographic Health Assessment Form
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Number, age, gender, education level, marriage, living conditions, tobacco and alcohol use, economic status, chronic illness history
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty criteria
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Frailty criteria comprising weak grip of <26.0 kg in men or <18.0 kg in women; walking slower than 0.8 m/s; self-reported exhaustion on more than 3 days/week; unintentional weight loss of >5.0 kg or 10% during the past year; and physical activity <3.75 MET/h in men or <2.5 MET/h in women (lowest quintile of sex-specific baseline values). People fulfilling three or more criteria were classed as frail, those who met one or two as prefrail, and those with no such deficits as robust.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty criteria
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
Frailty criteria comprising weak grip of <26.0 kg in men or <18.0 kg in women; walking slower than 0.8 m/s; self-reported exhaustion on more than 3 days/week; unintentional weight loss of >5.0 kg or 10% during the past year; and physical activity <3.75 MET/h in men or <2.5 MET/h in women (lowest quintile of sex-specific baseline values). People fulfilling three or more criteria were classed as frail, those who met one or two as prefrail, and those with no such deficits as robust.
three months after intervention(T1)
Cardiovascular health study (CHS) frailty criteria
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
Frailty criteria comprising weak grip of <26.0 kg in men or <18.0 kg in women; walking slower than 0.8 m/s; self-reported exhaustion on more than 3 days/week; unintentional weight loss of >5.0 kg or 10% during the past year; and physical activity <3.75 MET/h in men or <2.5 MET/h in women (lowest quintile of sex-specific baseline values). People fulfilling three or more criteria were classed as frail, those who met one or two as prefrail, and those with no such deficits as robust.
six months after intervention(T2)
Physical Activity-Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
SPPB consists of three domains: a Timed 4 m Walk, Balance, and a Chair Sit-to-Stand Test. Each performance measurement was assigned a score from 0 (inability to complete) to 4 (best performance possible). The total of the scores was used to obtain an overall measurement of physical performance. The maximum total score, including all three domains, is 12, and a higher score indicates better physical function.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Physical Activity-Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
SPPB consists of three domains: a Timed 4 m Walk, Balance, and a Chair Sit-to-Stand Test. Each performance measurement was assigned a score from 0 (inability to complete) to 4 (best performance possible). The total of the scores was used to obtain an overall measurement of physical performance. The maximum total score, including all three domains, is 12, and a higher score indicates better physical function.
three months after intervention(T1)
Physical Activity-Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
SPPB consists of three domains: a Timed 4 m Walk, Balance, and a Chair Sit-to-Stand Test. Each performance measurement was assigned a score from 0 (inability to complete) to 4 (best performance possible). The total of the scores was used to obtain an overall measurement of physical performance. The maximum total score, including all three domains, is 12, and a higher score indicates better physical function.
six months after intervention(T2)
Physical Activity-Grip Strength
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Grip strength was measured using a dynamometer based on two rounds of measurements for each hand.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Physical Activity-Grip Strength
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
Grip strength was measured using a dynamometer based on two rounds of measurements for each hand.
three months after intervention(T1)
Physical Activity-Grip Strength
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
Grip strength was measured using a dynamometer based on two rounds of measurements for each hand.
six months after intervention(T2)
Physical Activity-Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Administration of the TUG requires subjects to stand up from a chair, walk 2.44m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Physical Activity-Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: three month after intervention(T1)
Administration of the TUG requires subjects to stand up from a chair, walk 2.44m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
three month after intervention(T1)
Physical Activity-Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: six month after intervention(T2)
Administration of the TUG requires subjects to stand up from a chair, walk 2.44m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
six month after intervention(T2)
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
HRQOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 questionnaire (SF-12), which consists of eight items representing the following health profile dimensions: general health perception, physical functioning, role functioning-physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and role functioning-emotional. Responses are provided using a five- or six-point Likert scale, standardized according to the scoring system. Separate scores are provided for the physical and mental components of health.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
HRQOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 questionnaire (SF-12), which consists of eight items representing the following health profile dimensions: general health perception, physical functioning, role functioning-physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and role functioning-emotional. Responses are provided using a five- or six-point Likert scale, standardized according to the scoring system. Separate scores are provided for the physical and mental components of health.
three months after intervention(T1)
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
HRQOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 questionnaire (SF-12), which consists of eight items representing the following health profile dimensions: general health perception, physical functioning, role functioning-physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and role functioning-emotional. Responses are provided using a five- or six-point Likert scale, standardized according to the scoring system. Separate scores are provided for the physical and mental components of health.
six months after intervention(T2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
kinanthropometric measures-BMI
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women. We use weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
kinanthropometric measures-BMI
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women. We use weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2.
three months after intervention(T1)
kinanthropometric measures-BMI
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women. We use weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2.
six months after intervention(T2)
kinanthropometric measures-upper arm and calf circumference
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Upper arm and calf circumference were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a flexible but nonstretch measuring tape. Upper arm and calf circumference to measure nutritional status
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
kinanthropometric measures-upper arm and calf circumference
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
Upper arm and calf circumference were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a flexible but nonstretch measuring tape. Upper arm and calf circumference to measure nutritional status
three months after intervention(T1)
kinanthropometric measures-upper arm and calf circumference
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
Upper arm and calf circumference were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a flexible but nonstretch measuring tape. Upper arm and calf circumference to measure nutritional status
six months after intervention(T2)
short from falls efficacy scale international (FES-I)
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
The 7 items of the FES-I were rated on a 4-point Likert scale with the following possible answers (scores in parentheses): ''not at all'' (1); ''somewhat'' (2); 'fairly' (3); and 'very concerned' (4). If subjects were unable to perform the activity, they were encouraged to respond hypothetically. The range of possible total scores was from 7 to 28, with a high score indicating greater fear of falling.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
short from falls efficacy scale international (FES-I)
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
The 7 items of the FES-I were rated on a 4-point Likert scale with the following possible answers (scores in parentheses): ''not at all'' (1); ''somewhat'' (2); 'fairly' (3); and 'very concerned' (4). If subjects were unable to perform the activity, they were encouraged to respond hypothetically. The range of possible total scores was from 7 to 28, with a high score indicating greater fear of falling.
three months after intervention(T1)
short from falls efficacy scale international (FES-I)
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
The 7 items of the FES-I were rated on a 4-point Likert scale with the following possible answers (scores in parentheses): ''not at all'' (1); ''somewhat'' (2); 'fairly' (3); and 'very concerned' (4). If subjects were unable to perform the activity, they were encouraged to respond hypothetically. The range of possible total scores was from 7 to 28, with a high score indicating greater fear of falling.
six months after intervention(T2)
the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
ranging from "no pain= 0mm" to "unwilling pain= 100mm". Scores were calculated to the nearest millimetre with a ruler.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
ranging from "no pain= 0mm" to "unwilling pain= 100mm". Scores were calculated to the nearest millimetre with a ruler.
three months after intervention(T1)
the visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
ranging from "no pain= 0mm" to "unwilling pain= 100mm". Scores were calculated to the nearest millimetre with a ruler.
six months after intervention(T2)
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
IADL is a 15-item questionnaire that assesses recent participation in functional activity. For each item, participants are required to indicate the extent which four statements reflect their recent participation in an activity. Although responses regarding the four statements varied between items, scores generally ranged from 0 ("never") to 3 ("most days" or "at least once weekly"). Total scores, calculated by summing the item scores, range from 0 to 45.
baseline, pre-intervention(T0)
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)
Time Frame: three months after intervention(T1)
IADL is a 15-item questionnaire that assesses recent participation in functional activity. For each item, participants are required to indicate the extent which four statements reflect their recent participation in an activity. Although responses regarding the four statements varied between items, scores generally ranged from 0 ("never") to 3 ("most days" or "at least once weekly"). Total scores, calculated by summing the item scores, range from 0 to 45.
three months after intervention(T1)
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)
Time Frame: six months after intervention(T2)
IADL is a 15-item questionnaire that assesses recent participation in functional activity. For each item, participants are required to indicate the extent which four statements reflect their recent participation in an activity. Although responses regarding the four statements varied between items, scores generally ranged from 0 ("never") to 3 ("most days" or "at least once weekly"). Total scores, calculated by summing the item scores, range from 0 to 45.
six months after intervention(T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chia-Jung Hsieh, PhD, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FJU-IRB NO:C110071

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Fitness and Nutrition Program for Seniors

3
Subscribe