Canadian Health Advanced By Nutrition and Graded Exercise (CHANGE)

January 28, 2021 updated by: Daren K. Heyland

Canadian Health Advanced By Nutrition and Graded Exercise: CHANGE Health Paradigm

The overall objective of the CHANGE initiative is to change the delivery of care in primary care clinics to treat disease by reducing reliance on drugs and hospitals through the promotion of scientifically validated nutritional concepts and exercise. Specifically, the objective is to identify patients from primary care clinics with metabolic syndrome who are not morbidly obese and use diet and exercise interventions to reverse the changes, reduce reliance on pharmacotherapy and prevent progression to diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypertension, cardiovascular disease, strokes, diabetes and their complications including renal failure and neuropathy are major contributors to healthcare costs1. Metabolic Syndrome, a widespread genetic trait refers to a group of factors that increase risk for these diseases. Progression of the components of the metabolic syndrome can be significantly reduced by dietary manipulation and exercise.

The aging population, with both metabolic syndrome and muscular weakness, is going to result in an enormous social and financial burden not only for medical care but also for families caring for such patients. Existing knowledge would suggest that dietary modification and exercise training would substantially reduce the costs and complications of these medical conditions.

The Canadian Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cardiometabolic risk identify patients with metabolic syndrome who have an increased risk of cardiac and vascular disease and diabetes but the application of these results to prevent disease has been a dismal failure in general and in particular, in our country.

The current model of advice about preventive care is through family doctors (FD) in the primary care setting. FDs tend not to advise their patients about diet and exercise for a variety of reasons including a lack of education about these modalities, a lack of support from professionals qualified to assess and advise about diet and exercise, the belief that drugs are better, lack of time and a lack of reimbursement in addition to patient barriers to adoption. Although other factors, such has smoking, hypercoagulability and increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines increase cardiometabolic risk, these changes are closely related to the metabolic syndrome. "Health behavior interventions" are identified as critical to preventing the occurrence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. These interventions can be associated with appropriate pharmacotherapy where required. The guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary team to manage these interventions. In addition it is also recommended that ethnicity be considered in these interventions.

The various traits associated with the metabolic syndrome are strongly influenced by genetic factors, i.e. the heritability of abdominal obesity and insulin resistance are estimated to be as high as 70%. Accordingly, the investigators propose to examine numerous genetic polymorphisms (also referred to as markers) that have been linked to the various traits associated with metabolic syndrome in a sub study. It is hypothesized that these markers can be used as a means to better predict the variable responses observed in individuals following a lifestyle intervention. Several companies have begun to commercialize direct-to-consumer genetic-testing to provide nutritional counseling to individuals based on the analysis of a small subset of polymorphisms11; however, there is an absence of scientific research to either support or refute the value of genetic markers for predicting an individual's response. Considering common genetic markers in a lifestyle intervention study will enable us to assess their value for predicting response.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

305

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1K 7P4
        • Clinique de kinésiologie de l'Université Laval
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • Edmonton Oliver Primary Care Network
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3H 5S4
        • Canadian Phase Onward Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >/= 18 years old
  • Fasting Blood Glucose >/= 5.6 mmol/L or receiving pharmacotherapy
  • Blood Pressure of >/= 130/85 mm Hg or receiving pharmacotherapy
  • Triglyceride of >/= 1.7 mmol/L or receiving pharmacotherapy
  • HDL-C < 1.0 mmol/L Males and < 1.3 mmol/L females
  • Abdominal circumference as determined by a pre-specified technique:
  • Europids/Whites/sub-Saharan Africans/Mediterranean/middle east >/= 94 cm Males, >/= 80 cm Female.
  • Asian and South Central Americans >/= 90 cm males and >/=80 cm females
  • US and Canadian Whites >/= 102 cm males, >/=88 cm females.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to speak, read or understand English and/or French for the Laval University participants.
  • Having a medical or physical condition that makes moderate intensity physical activity difficult or unsafe.
  • Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus only if any one of the following are present

    1. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
    2. Nephropathy (Suggested parameters: serum creatinine > 160 µmol/L)
    3. Clinically manifest neuropathy defined as absent ankle jerks
    4. Severe fasting hyperglycemia > 11 mmol/L
    5. Peripheral vascular disease
  • Significant medical co-morbidities, including uncontrolled metabolic disorders (e.g., thyroid, renal , liver), heart disease, stroke and ongoing substance abuse
  • Clinically significant renal failure
  • Diagnosis of psychiatric disorders (cognitive impairment) that would limit adequate informed consent or ability to comply with study protocol
  • Diagnosis of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) that was active or treated with radiation or chemotherapy within the past 2 years
  • Diagnosis of a terminal illness and/or in hospice care
  • Pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Investigator discretion for clinical safety or protocol adherence reasons
  • Chronic inflammatory diseases
  • Body Mass Index > 35

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diet and exercise
A combined diet and exercise program tailored to individuals incorporating behavioural modification support
Nutrition assessment, review of the basic principles of dietary intervention for metabolic syndrome with an emphasis on the clinical risk factors identified for each individual, joint goal setting to determine what dietary changes are feasible, considering intention and barriers to dietary behaviour change.
Other Names:
  • Nutrition therapy
  • Dietary counselling
  • Behavioural therapy
Exercise tests (aerobic fitness, muscular and flexibility tests) recommended by the Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology (CSEP), followed by an individualized exercise plan including fitness assessments.
Other Names:
  • physical activity intervention
  • Exercise plan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the Diet Intervention
Time Frame: At 12 months
Percentage of the prescribed diet visits visits attended over 12 months. Each participant was to attend a total of 21 prescribed diet visits over 12 months.
At 12 months
Feasibility of the Exercise Intervention
Time Frame: At 12 months
Percentage of the prescribed exercise visits attended over 12 months. Each participant was to attend a total of 21 prescribed exercise visits over 12 months.
At 12 months
Number of Participants That Have Reversal of Metabolic Syndrome
Time Frame: At 12 months compared to baseline measures
Metabolic syndrome is defined as having 3/5 of the following: elevated blood pressure (or on medication), elevated blood sugars (or on medication), elevated triglycerides (or on medication), low HDL-C and a large waist circumference. Reversal of metabolic syndrome is defined as having less than 3/5 criteria
At 12 months compared to baseline measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Improvements in at Least One Individual Components of Metabolic Syndrome
Time Frame: At 12 months compared to baseline
Improvements in blood pressure (or elimination of medication), blood sugars (or elimination of medication), triglycerides (or elimination of medication), HDL-C and waist circumference
At 12 months compared to baseline
Change From Baseline in Diet Quality-Canadian Healthy Eating Index
Time Frame: Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Canadian Health Eating Index (HEI-C) is reported on a 100 point score with a higher score indicating a better outcome. A higher score means a better outcome. HEI-C is on a 100 point score.
Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Change From Baseline in Diet Quality-Mediterranean Diet Score
Time Frame: Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) is reported on a 0-14 point score with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Change From Baseline in Aerobic Capacity
Time Frame: Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Estimated maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) standardized to age and sex
Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Changes in Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Events
Time Frame: Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Changes in PROCAM score, which estimates the risk of a myocardial infarction or dying from an acute coronary event within the next 10 years. Similar to Framingham risk score but for metabolic syndrome. A lower score means a better outcome. PROCAM score varies from 0-87,0 means there are no risk factors (pt is younger than 39), while 87 means the patient is a smoker and older than 60 years and presents all risk factors
Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Changes in Continuous Metabolic Syndrome Risk Score
Time Frame: Change at 12 months compared to baseline
Metabolic syndrome risk score is a composite continuous score that measures the severity of metabolic syndrome as a continuous variable rather than dichotomized with arbitrary cut-points . The score is the principal component of waist circumference, glucose, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides. It has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1 with higher score meaning greater risk. Reference Hillier TA, et al., Practical way to assess metabolic syndrome using a continuous score obtained from principal components analysis. Diabetologia (2006) 49:1528-1535
Change at 12 months compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Khush Jeejeebhoy, MD, University of Toronto
  • Study Chair: Paula Brauer, University of Guelph
  • Study Chair: Angelo Tremblay, Laval University
  • Principal Investigator: David Mutch, PhD, University of Guelph
  • Principal Investigator: Doug Klein, MD, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Lew Pliamm, MD, Canadian Phase Onward
  • Principal Investigator: Caroline Rheaume, Laval University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Dietary Intervention

3
Subscribe