Effect of Home-exercise Programs Versus Supervised Core Stability Exercises on Hypertensive Patient With Low Back Pain

April 25, 2024 updated by: Mohamed Ababa, Ahram Canadian University

The Effectiveness of Home-based Exercise Programs Versus Supervised Conventional Core Stability Exercises in Treatment of Chronic Mechanical, Non-specific Low Back Pain Patients With Controlled Hypertension

Thirty male and female hypertension patients with chronic mechanical non-specific low back pain were included in this randomized controlled study conducted at the Ababa Private Physical Therapy Center in Beni-Seuf, Egypt. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups; the study group A control (n = 15) had a supervised conventional core stability, while the study group B (n = 15) received a home exercise program. In both groups' patients had evaluations before and after their six-week course of therapy. Modified-modified Schober test was used to assess the active back range of motion (ROM), Arabic version of Oswestry disability index (ODI) was utilized to evaluate functional disability, and visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Giza, Egypt, 3387722
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • hypertensive patient
  • patient with chronic back pain
  • The patients aged 30 to 50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with vertebral fractures
  • patient with surgical spinal fixation
  • patient with rheumatic disorders
  • patient with systemic diseases
  • patient with multiple sclerosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A (control) received supervised conventional core stability exercise program Study
Group A (control) received supervised conventional core stability exercise program
Other: the core stability exercise
supervised conventional core stability exercise
Experimental: group B received a home-based exercise program
Group B received a home-based exercise program.
Other: home exercise program
Patients in group B were taught the core stability exercise in the first visit they received Arabic printed booklet for exercise description repetitions with diagrams in addition to Arabic illustration videos, they received a weekly telephone call to ensure their compliance to the exercise & motivation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of pain
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale
up to 4 weeks
Assessment of lumbar flexion range of motion
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
performed by modified modified schober test
up to 4 weeks
Assessment of functional disability
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
performed by Oswestry disability questionnaire version 2.0
up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Ahram Canadian University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PT-NEUR-10/2023-520

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on the core stability exercise

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Argentina

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe