Improving Care of Prader-Willi Syndrome : Evaluation of a New Care Program Combining Adapted Physical Activity, Nutrition and Therapeutic Education (APHYNET)

September 30, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare and complex genetic disease characterized by hypothalamic-pituitary axis dysfunction combining eating disorders associated with hyperphagia and satiety deficiency, mild intellectual deficit and behavioral disorders. This disease requires continuous management through specific therapeutic education to prevent metabolic and cardiorespiratory complications related to obesity. Physical activity must therefore be regular, adapted to the disability, taking into account cognitive deficits and behavioral disorders.

The Unit of Care and Rehabilitation, of the Hôpital Marin d'Hendaye, receives patients with PWS or other obesity from rare causes, at a rate of 1 to 2 annual stays of 1 to 2 months, which allow the regulation of somatic disorders and the initiation of weight loss. However, the difficulty is to keep a stable weight curve between stays. Only 20% of patients over the last 2 years managed to stabilize or decrease their BMI during the 6 months following their hospitalization.

The proposed study aims to evaluate an innovative and individualized care program combining Physical activity, Nutrition and therapeutic education for adults with PWS who will be admitted to the hospital for 5 weeks.

We hypothesize that this program will allow to stabilize or decrease the BMI of patients at 6 months after hospitalization by inducing a behavioral change in terms of physical activity and eating behavior.

We will conduct a randomized controlled trial on 128 patients who will participate in this program, or will benefit from standard care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Main objective :

Evaluate the effectiveness at 6 months of an intensified and individualised care programme combining theoretical and practical therapeutic education workshops on adapted physical activity, nutrition and eating behaviour (i.e. intervention) during hospitalisation, compared to usual care (i.e. control).

The assessment will be done by comparing the proportion of patients stabilizing or decreasing their BMI at 6 months after the end of the stay (M7) in the 2 groups (intervention/control).

Secondary objectives:

During hospitalization:

To evaluate, compared to the usual care, the impact of the intervention on :

  1. The evolution of physical capacities,
  2. The evolution of metabolic criteria and metabolic and cardio-respiratory risk factors,
  3. The evolution of eating behaviour,
  4. Adherence to the program during hospitalization.

At 3 and 6 months after hospitalization :

Evaluate the impact of the intervention on :

  1. The evolution of weekly physical activity at home,
  2. The evolution of eating behaviour at home,
  3. Reaching the personalized objective set for the inter-stay.

At 6 months after hospitalization:

Evaluate, in comparison with the usual management, the impact of the intervention on the evolution of metabolic criteria and metabolic and cardio-respiratory risk factors during a consultation at the hospital in their reference center.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hendaye, France, 64701
        • Service diététique Hôpital Marin d'Hendaye- AP-HP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient between 18 and 60 years old Patient with genetically confirmed PWS
  • Admitted for a 5-week stay in the Hendaye rehabilitation care unit
  • Patient or legal guardian (tutor or curator) who has given written informed consent to participate in the study
  • With the presence of an external relay available to coordinate the patient's journey during the protocol: family or educational referent (home)
  • Affiliated with French social security except patient under AME (State medical aid)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decompensation of a cardiorespiratory or psychiatric pathology in the 3 months prior to inclusion that required hospitalisation
  • Patients whose condition may interfere with their optimal participation in the study (e.g., severe behavioural problems preventing participation in group workshops)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional group
Patients will receive the usual care, with the intervention of the multidisciplinary team which defines with the patient the objectives of the stay and the inter-stay period, without "specific therapeutic education" on adapted physical activity, nutrition and eating behaviour.
Patients will benefit from the activities already proposed as part of the usual practice and in addition a multidisciplinary staff will take place in order to interpret the assessments of the patients included and to direct the patients according to their phenotypic profile towards the different programmes of adapted physical activity.
No Intervention: Standard care group
Patients will benefit from the activities already proposed as part of the usual practice and in addition a multidisciplinary staff will take place in order to interpret the assessments of the patients included and to direct the patients according to their phenotypic profile towards the different programmes of adapted physical activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: week 4
week 4
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: week 7
week 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
six minute walking test (6MWT)
Time Frame: week 4
week 4
Forced Vital Capacity
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
baseline and week 4
Maximum Volume Expired in the 1st Second
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
baseline and week 4
Prospective assessment of clinical features before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Weight in kilograms, Height in meters to calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m^2
baseline and week 4
Difference of CRP dosage between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
CRP measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of Glycated hemoglobin (Hba1C) between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Glycated hemoglobin (Hba1C) measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of fasting blood glucose between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
fasting blood glucose level measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of cholesterol between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Cholesterol measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of Glycemy between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Glycemy measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of transaminases between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Transaminases measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of Gamma GT between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Gamma GT measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of Alkaline phosphatase between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Alkaline phosphatase measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of urea between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
Urea measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of creatinine between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
creatinine measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
Difference of albumin between before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program
Time Frame: baseline and week 4
albumin measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
baseline and week 4
RELIME : REal LIfe Meal Evaluation score
Time Frame: baseline and week 4

This score is devided in 3 under-scores which are:

  • "eating behavior score" scale of 0 to 30
  • "general behavior score" scale of 0 to 20
  • "social behavior score" scale of 0 to 16 The final score is on a scale of 0 to 66. 0 is the minimum and the best score. 66 is the maximum and worst score.
baseline and week 4
Adhesion Grid Scores
Time Frame: baseline and week 4

This score is devided in 2 scores which are :

"adhesion" on a scale of 0 to 2 "motivation" on a scale of 0 to 2

The final score is the addition of them on a scale of 0 to 4. The minimum and worst score is 0. The maximum and best score is 4.

baseline and week 4
Ricci & Gagnon self-questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, Month 4, Month 7

This score is on a scale of 0 to 45, 0 is the minimum and worst score and 45 the maximum and worst score of physical activity.

Score under 18 means "inactive" Score between 18 and 35 means "active" Score superior to 35 means "very active"

baseline, Month 4, Month 7
Hyperphagia Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, Month 4, Month 7

This score is devided in 3 under-scores which are :

  • "hyperphagic behavior" score on a scale of 5 to 25
  • "hyperphagic drive" score on a scale of 4 to 20
  • "hyperphagic severity" score on a scale of 2 to 10 The final score is on a scale of 11 to 55. 11 is the minimum and best score. 55 is the maximum and worst score.
baseline, Month 4, Month 7
Weight
Time Frame: Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7
Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7
Goal Attainment Scaling
Time Frame: baseline, Month 4, Month 7

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for writting personalized evaluation scales in order to quantify progress towards defined goals.

The GAS methodology consists of:

  • defining an rehabilitation goal with the patient
  • choosing an observable behavior that reflects the degree of goal attainment
  • assessing the patient's initial level (pre- intervention) with respect to the goal
  • defining five goal attainment levels , ranging from "no change" (-2) to "a much better than expected outcome" (+2)
  • Evaluating the patient after the set time frame and determine the GAS score between -2 and +2

A five point scale is used :

" -2 " is the baseline ; " -1 " represents progression to the goal without goal attainment ; " 0 " is the expected level after intervention ; " +1 " is represent a better outcome than expected ; " +2 " is the best possible outcometha t could have been expected to the goal

Scores between " 0 " and " +2 " indicate that the patient has achieved the objective

baseline, Month 4, Month 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hélène PASTRE, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Program combing APA, Nutrition, and Therapeutic Education

Subscribe