Investigation of the Effectiveness of Environmental Enrichment-Based Intervention in Preterm Infants

June 5, 2023 updated by: Gamze Cagla Sirma, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness the HEP (Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity) approach, which based upon the principles of enriched environment (EE) and ecological theories of development on preterm infants with developmental delay risk.

Thirty-two preterm infants aged 4-10 months will be randomly divided into 2 groups as the HEP intervention group and the Traditional Physical Therapy (TPT) group.

EE-based intervention will be applied to the HEP intervention group, and traditional physiotherapy will be applied to the TPT group for 12 weeks (24 sessions).

The demographic information of the participants will be recorded. The motor and sensory functions of the infants will be evaluated with, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) and the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants™ (TSFI™), respectively. Additionally, the anxiety status of the parents will be evaluated with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). All evaluations will be done twice, at the end and at the beginning of 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Premature birth is defined by WHO (World Health Organization) as all births occurring before 37 weeks of gestation. The global preterm birth rate for 2014 is estimated at 10.6% (9%-12%), equating to an estimated 14.84 million (12.65 million-16.73 million) live preterm births in 2014.

Preterm birth results in significant healthcare utilization and costs. Families of preterm infants often experience significant psychological and significant psychological and financial difficulties. Preterm infants have an increased risk for social, cognitive, language, sensory processing and motor skill disorders. There are different early intervention methods for preterm infants, and enriched environment (EE)-based intervention is one of the current intervention methods that have been used recently. There are studies showing that EE-based interventions have neurobehavioral benefits and positively affect brain functions and motor development.

There are a limited number of studies on EE-based early intervention methods in the literature, and these studies were conducted in different age and diagnosis groups by applying different intervention methods. Therefore, more studies are needed on this subject.

In this study, it was aimed to contribute to the literature in this field and to investigate the effectiveness of an EE-based intervention on the sensory and motor functions of preterm infants and the emotional state of the family.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 months to 10 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be in corrected age between 4 and 10 months
  • To being born 33 weeks and 6 days of gestation and before,
  • To absence of any systemic disease, congenital anomaly,
  • The family's volunteer to participate regularly in the study process.
  • Having abnormal or suspect results on the Denver Developmental Screening Test II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To be born at or after 34 weeks of gestational age
  • To having experienced intraventricular bleeding (Grade III and IV),
  • To having major vision or hearing problems
  • To having medical conditions that prevent active participation in the study (such as oxygen dependence)
  • To participate in other experimental rehabilitation studies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity
HEP group will receive an environmental enrichment-based intervention.
The Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity (HEP) intervention group will receive 45 minutes of face-to-face environmental enrichment-based intervention one day per week and online home support once a week for 12 weeks.
Experimental: Traditional Physical Therapy
TPT group will receive traditional physiotherapy intervention.
The Traditional Physical Therapy group will receive a 45-minute intervention, two days a week for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Skills PDMS-2 Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd Edition
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2nd Edition (PDMS-2):

PDMS-2 evaluates fine and gross motor skills of children from birth to six years of age relative to their peers. There are four subtests on gross motor skills (Reflexes, stationary performances, locomotion, object manipulation) and two subtests on fine motor skills (Grasping, visual-motor integration).

In the test, the skills to be assessed are listed in chronological order. The test starts at the child's age-appropriate beginner level (the level at which he gets 2 points on three items in a row) and ends when the child scores 0 on each of the three items in a row.

Each item is scored as 0 (does not show performance criteria), 1 (shows some of the performance criteria), 2 (shows performance criteria) according to the child's performance, and the total score for each section is calculated at the end of the test.

12 weeks
Sensory Function
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Test of Sensory Functions in Infants™ (TSFI™):

TSFI consists of 5 subtests and 24 items. The application time is approximately 20 minutes.

In the subtests of the test, reactivity to tactile deep pressure, adaptive motor functions, visual-tactile integration, ocular-motor control, and reactivity to vestibular stimulation are evaluated and all items are scored.

The infant is evaluated as normal, at-risk, or deficient in terms of sensory processing according to the total score he/she gets. A higher score indicates better sensory processing.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Health
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI):

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) consists of 21 self-reported items that question physical and cognitive anxiety symptoms such as hot flashes, fear of something bad happening to oneself, heart palpitations, irritability, fear of drowning, and sweating not related to heat.

The individual scores from 0 to 3 how intensely they have experienced these symptoms during the past week. The total score may range from 0 and 63: 0-7 points indicate minimal anxiety, 8-15 points indicate mild anxiety, 16-25 points indicate moderate anxiety, and 26-63 points indicate severe anxiety.

12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Aymen Balıkçı, Asst. Prof., Fenerbahçe University
  • Principal Investigator: Gamze Çağla Sırma, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Development, Infant

Clinical Trials on HEP

Subscribe