- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05268055
Sign Here: How to Conduct Informed Consent With Deaf Individuals
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The U.S. Deaf community - a minority group of more than 500,000 people who use American Sign Language (ASL) - is one of the most understudied and underserved populations within our nation's healthcare system. Reasons for this underrepresentation include lack of language access in healthcare and research settings, as well as communal feelings of mistrust toward the medical community. For example, healthcare providers and clinical researchers follow a medical model to "cure" or "fix" deafness, whereas most Deaf people do not want to be fixed, but rather to be respected as a cultural and linguistic minority group.
To begin to rectify this mistrust and underrepresentation, the informed consent process has been suggested as a key area of intervention. From 2016 - 2018, our team produced a film to train research personnel to effectively interact with Deaf research participants during the informed consent process. The intervention was designed through a two-year collaboration with the local Deaf community - community forums, focus groups, and an intervention development team inclusive of Deaf researchers, filmmakers, and laypeople.
In 2022, our team conducted a second series of focus groups with key stakeholders to refine, expand, and tailor a new version of the Sign Here training film for healthcare providers. Filmmaking is currently underway. In April 2023, we will launch a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the new training intervention. Eighty healthcare providers, medical students, and nursing students will be randomized to receive (1) the Sign Here training film or (2) an "intervention as usual" condition (i.e., standard written guidance on how to communicate with Deaf patients in healthcare settings). Primary outcomes are provider cultural competence, communication skill, and ability to build trust, which will be tested via virtual simulation with a Deaf standardized patient.
Results will potentially validate a product of immediate value - a highly-accessible, easy-to-disseminate training film to promote the inclusion of Deaf people in our nation's healthcare system. Results will also inform the design of a large, multi-institution study to explore the real-world scalability of the Sign Here training film in medical schools across the U.S.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
- University of Massachusetts Medical School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18+
- self-identification as a healthcare provider, medical student, or nursing student
- current or recent engagement in informed consent for treatment
- access to an informed consent form that can be used for a simulated informed consent session
- We will also screen participants' self-reported level of experience with Deaf people, as we aim to recruit participants with little-to-no prior experience interacting with Deaf people to reflect the most probable real-word encounter that a Deaf person would have when receiving healthcare services.
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: "Sign Here" training intervention
Participants randomized to the experimental condition will view the new "Sign Here" training film for healthcare providers.
|
Training film to educate healthcare providers to competently and sensitively interact with Deaf patients in healthcare settings.
|
|
Other: Intervention as usual
Participants randomized to intervention as usual will review "Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings" (https://archive.ada.gov/hospcombrprt.pdf)
|
"Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Hospital Settings" (https://archive.ada.gov/hospcombrprt.pdf)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Provider Cultural Competency
Time Frame: post-intervention, up to one month
|
A validated scale used to measure provider cultural competence.
Total scores range from 9 to 63, with higher scores indicative of higher levels of cultural competency.
|
post-intervention, up to one month
|
|
Ask, Understand, Remember Assessment
Time Frame: post-intervention, up to one month
|
A validated scale used to measure participants' communication skill.
Total scores range from 4 to 16, with higher scores indicating better communication skills.
|
post-intervention, up to one month
|
|
Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale
Time Frame: post-intervention, up to one month
|
A validated scale used to measure the ability to build trust with the standardized patient/participant.
Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater ability to build trust.
|
post-intervention, up to one month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Intervention Understanding & Retention
Time Frame: post-intervention, up to one month
|
A ten-question multiple choice test to assess their understanding and retention of intervention content.
Total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater comprehension and retention.
|
post-intervention, up to one month
|
|
Self-Rating of Simulation
Time Frame: post-intervention, up to one month
|
Participants complete a self-assessment using the validated scales described above to rate their conduct of culturally-appropriate informed consent in the simulation and are also asked to provide feedback on the study experience. For the Healthcare Provider Cultural Competency scale, total scores range from 9 to 63, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. For the Ask, Understand, Remember Assessment, total scores range from 4 to 16, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. For the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale, total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. |
post-intervention, up to one month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Melissa L Anderson, melissa.anderson@umassmed.edu
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- H00021294
- 5R21DC019216 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cultural Competency
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedCultural CompetencyTurkey
-
Gazi UniversityNot yet recruitingCultural CompetencyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of OuluThe Finnish Association of Nursing Research; Finnish Nurses AssociationCompletedMentoring | Cultural CompetencyFinland
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Library of Medicine (NLM)Completed
-
Giresun UniversityCompletedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Cultural CompetencyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Fenway Community HealthPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Kaiser Permanente; Howard Brown... and other collaboratorsCompletedEducation | Gender Identity | Sexual Orientation | LGBT Health | Cultural CompetencyUnited States
-
Parc de Salut MarActive, not recruitingMental Disorders | Psychiatric Hospitalization | Cultural CompetencySpain
-
Queen's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia; University of Calgary; Laurentian UniversityUnknownDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Cultural CompetencyCanada
-
Boston Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Northeastern UniversityTerminated
-
Alvaro Castellanos OrtegaEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Generalitat ValencianaUnknownCompetency-Based EducationSpain
Clinical Trials on "Sign Here" training intervention
-
University Hospital, GhentUniversity GhentRecruiting
-
Georgia Institute of TechnologyNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Montana State UniversityNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); Northern... and other collaboratorsCompletedSexual Behavior | Reproductive BehaviorUnited States
-
Mclean HospitalTerminatedDepression | Attention Training | Symptoms, Cognitive | Symptoms, Affective | Symptoms, BehavioralUnited States
-
University of South-Eastern NorwayThe Norwegian Olympic Sports Center (Olympiatoppen)Completed
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
University of ArkansasCompleted
-
Hasselt UniversityUniversity of LiegeCompleted
-
Paracelsus Medical UniversityCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusAustria
-
University of Nove de JulhoUniversity of Sao PauloCompleted