Influence of Immobilisation, Stretching and Activity on Morphological and Mechanical Properties of Spastic Muscle

March 27, 2026 updated by: Medical University of Graz

Neurologic changes caused by cerebral palsy (CP) result in adaptation of muscle architecture and function (e.g. shortened muscles and contractures). Stretching through immobilization (orthotic treatment) is one of the common interventions to bring the spastic muscle to growth. Positive outcomes of stretching through immobilization are increased range of motion and improved function. On the other hand, immobilization leads to disuse muscle atrophy. Hence, we hypothesize that combining a stretching through immobilization and muscle activity while controlling for foot deformity could be a superior treatment approach, which should lead to improved muscle morphology as well as function. The aim of the study is to examine the influence of two orthotic treatments (a standard regime and one new approach) on spastic plantar flexor muscles in children and adolescents with CP. The standard regime (stretching through immobilisation) includes a dynamic AFO (ankle-foot orthosis) used during day and night. The new approach combines stretching through immobilisation and allows for plantarflexor activity due to an innovative construction of the orthotic device.

This prospective randomized controlled study will recruit 20 ambulant children and adolescents (aged 5 to 15 years) with cerebral palsy and equinus deformity (GMFCS = Gross Motor Function Classification System level I to III). Each child will be randomized and stratified according to age and GMFCS to one of two groups. The first group receives the standard treatment (stretching through immobilization) using custom-made ankle foot orthosis for 23 hours per day. The other group will be treated with the same orthosis at night (8 hours) and for 6 hours during the day but the remaining 10 hours will be treated with the foot shell only that corrects subtalar and Chopart joints but does not block the ankle joint movement, so that more activity of plantarflexors will be possible during the day. The intervention will last for 12 weeks. Each child will be examined at four occasions (8 weeks before intervention = control phase, at the beginning of the intervention and then 8 and 12 weeks later). The main outcome measure is the fascicle length measured using a 3D ultrasound (3DUS) imaging technique. Further parameters of interest span across the whole levels of ICF including clinical examinations, biomechanics of gait, muscle morphologic and mechanic properties and participations questionnaires.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Styria
      • Graz, Styria, Austria, 8036
        • Medical University Graz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory children with spastic CP.
  • Ability to accept and follow verbal instruction.
  • Limited range of motion in ankle joint - maximal dorsiflexion with knee extended ≤ 5°
  • Gross Motor Functional Classification System level I-III.
  • Age 5-15 years.
  • Willingness to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other than spastic form of CP (ataxic, athetoid or dystonic).
  • Severe mental retardation.
  • Normal range of motion in ankle joint
  • Oral antispastic or muscle relaxing medication.
  • History of orthopaedic surgery in the last 12 months.
  • History of botulinum toxin type A application in the last six months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Immobilization group (IG)
One group - immobilization group (IG) - will receive the standard treatment.
The immobilization group (IG) will receive the standard treatment, a dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for night and day use (23 hours per day)
Other Names:
  • IG
Experimental: Immobilization/Activity Group (IAG)
The other group - Immobilization/Activity Group (IAG) - will be treated with a new approach.
The Immobilization/Activity Group (IAG) will be treated with the same type of ankle-foot orthosis at night (8 hours) and for 6 hours during the day (altogether orthosis treatment 14 hours per day). The rest of the day (10 hours) children and adolescents will be using only the foot shell of orthoses (FS) without the lower leg shell, to secure the correct position of the foot and to allow a free motion at ankle joint with a good correction of the foot deformity (e.g. Pes equinovarus / equinovalgus, midfoot-break).
Other Names:
  • IAG
Other: Control Phase
Before the intervention with the orthotic treatment starts, a control phase of 8 weeks is planned.
Before the intervention with the orthotic treatment starts, a control phase of 8 weeks is planned. During this time, the individual orthoses for each subject are manufactured.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mechano-morphological muscle-tendon properties - muscle volume
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Gastrocnemius medialis muscle volume
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in mechano-morphological muscle-tendon properties - fascile length
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Gastrocnemius medialis fascile length
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in mechano-morphological muscle-tendon properties - unit length
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Gastrocnemius medialis muscle belly, tendon and muscle-tendon unit length
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in mechano-morphological muscle-tendon properties - elongation
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Passive gastrocnemius medialis muscle belly, tendon and muscle-tendon unit elongation due to externally applied torque to the ankle joint [elongation in mm]
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in mechano-morphological muscle-tendon properties - stiffness
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Passive gastrocnemius medialis muscle belly, tendon and muscle-tendon unit stiffness due to externally applied torque to the ankle joint [stiffness in N/mm]
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in joint range of motion
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Ankle joint range of motion (maximal plantarflexion - maximal dorsiflexion)
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in maximal isometric muscle strength
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Maximal isometric torque production (isokinetic dynamometry)
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in gait characteristics
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Gait kinematics (joint angles [°]) and kinetics (joint moments [Nm/kg]) of the hip, knee, and ankle joints (3D motion capture). Joint angles [°] and moments [Nm/kg] will be combined to report changes in gait pattern.
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in self-reported gait, mobility, and functional performance - GOAL
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Change in self-reported gait, mobility, and functional performance - PODCI
Time Frame: Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)
Pediatrics Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline (T1), PRE-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), POST-measurement (T3, 16 weeks), FOLLOW-UP measurement (T4, 20 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Habersack, BSc MSc, Medical University of Graz
  • Principal Investigator: Martin Svehlik, MD PhD, Medical University of Graz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

It is yet not decided if individual data will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy, Spastic

Clinical Trials on Stretching through immobilisation (IG)

Subscribe