A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Anti-Aging Serum

February 26, 2022 updated by: Revision Skincare

A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Anti-Aging Serum

This double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerance of an anti-aging serum to improve moderate overall photodamage and skin fatigue of aging skin after 7 days of twice-daily use when compared to the efficacy of a combination of anti-aging serum and an anti-aging facial moisturizer. A total of 26 female subjects, aged 34-60, completed study participation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerance of an anti-aging serum (Cell 1) to improve moderate overall photodamage and skin fatigue of aging skin after 7 days of twice-daily use when compared to the efficacy of a combination of anti-aging serum and an anti-aging facial moisturizer (Cell 2). Skin fatigue was characterized by dehydrated skin with a lack of firmness (visual) and a dull appearance on the global face.

Efficacy and tolerability were assessed through clinical grading at baseline, day 3, and day 7. Efficacy evaluation on fine lines and wrinkles in the crow's feet area; overall eye appearance on the periocular area; and smoothness (tactile), firmness (visual), radiance, and overall photodamage on the global face were performed 15 minutes post product application. Self-assessment questionnaires, Glossymeter measurements, and VISIA photography were completed at baseline, day 3, and day 7.

A total of 26 subjects completed study participation, which included 12 subjects in Cell 1, and 14 subjects in Cell 2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 75081
        • SGS Stephens, inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, 30 to 60 years of age
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I -IV
  • Moderate overall photodamage of the skin
  • Moderate lack of firmness (visual) of the skin
  • Moderate dull appearance of the skin
  • Subjects must be willing to withhold all facial treatments during the course of the study and have not undergone a treatment within the last 6 months
  • Subject must be willing to provide verbal understanding and written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with known allergies to facial skincare products
  • Nursing, pregnant, or planning to become during the duration of the study
  • History of skin cancer within the past 5 years
  • Having used oral isotretinoin within the last 12 months
  • Having used prescription-strength skin-lightening products within the last 3 months
  • Having used any anti-wrinkle, skin-lightening, or other product or topical or systemic medication known to affect skin aging or dyschromia within the last 4 weeks
  • Having a health condition and/or pre-existing or dermatologic disorder that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with the outcome of the study
  • Having observable sunburn, suntan, scars, excessive facial hair, or other dermal conditions on the face that, in the Investigator's opinion, may influence test results
  • Having a history of immunosuppression/immune deficiency disorders, or currently using oral or systemic immunosuppressive medications and biologics, and/or undergoing radiation or chemotherapy
  • Using or having regularly used systemic or topical corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks
  • Having started a long-term medication within the last 2 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cell 1: Anti-aging Serum

Dosage form: Anti-aging Serum

Frequency of Dosage: two times daily. Subjects are asked to apply 2 pumps of the Anti-aging Serum.

Study Duration: 7 days

Serum composed of a patent-pending botanical extract, bioavailable peptides, antioxidants, post-biotics, and short and long-term moisturizers
Facial cleansing lotion to be used by study participants
Other Names:
  • Revision Skincare® Cleansing Lotion
Sunscreen to be applied after application of serum in the morning. Participants were asked to reapply every 2 hours
Other Names:
  • Aveeno Positively Mineral Sensitive Skin SPF 40+
Sunscreen to be applied after application of facial moisturizer in the morning. Participants were asked to reapply every 2 hours
Other Names:
  • Aveeno Positively Mineral Sensitive Skin SPF 40+
Active Comparator: Cell 2: Anti-aging Serum and Facial Moisturizer

Dosage form: Anti-aging Serum and Facial Moisturizer

Frequency of Dosage: two times daily. Subjects are asked to apply 2 pumps of the Anti-aging Serum, and then 2 pumps of the Facial Moisturizer to the global face.

Study Duration: 7 days

Serum composed of a patent-pending botanical extract, bioavailable peptides, antioxidants, post-biotics, and short and long-term moisturizers
Facial cleansing lotion to be used by study participants
Other Names:
  • Revision Skincare® Cleansing Lotion
Sunscreen to be applied after application of serum in the morning. Participants were asked to reapply every 2 hours
Other Names:
  • Aveeno Positively Mineral Sensitive Skin SPF 40+
Sunscreen to be applied after application of facial moisturizer in the morning. Participants were asked to reapply every 2 hours
Other Names:
  • Aveeno Positively Mineral Sensitive Skin SPF 40+
Anti-aging facial moisturizer to be used by study participants after serum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Grading of Efficacy Parameters
Time Frame: 7 days

The primary efficacy endpoint will be the Investigator Clinical Grading using Modified Griffith's 10-point Scale. A decrease in scores at Day 3, and Day 7 in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter. The efficacy parameters will be assessed globally on each subject's face using a modified Griffiths' 10-point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half-point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe the skin condition):

0 = none (best possible condition); 1 to 3 = mild; 4 to 6 = moderate;7 to 9 = severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.

7 days
Tolerability Evaluations
Time Frame: 7 days

The primary tolerability endpoint will be the Investigator Tolerability Assessment of Erythema, Edema and Dryness. A decrease in scores or lack of significant increase at Day 3, and Day 7 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

Example for Erythema: Erythema 0 = None No erythema of the treatment area

  1. = Mild Slight, but definite redness of the treatment area
  2. = Moderate Definite redness of the treatment area
  3. = Severe Marked redness of the treatment area
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Irritation Evaluation
Time Frame: 7 days

The secondary tolerability endpoint will be the Subject Tolerability Assessment of Burning, Itching and Stinging. A decrease in scores or lack of significant increase at Day 3, and Day 7 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

Example Burning. 0 = None No burning of the treatment area

  1. = Mild Slight burning sensation of the treatment area; not really bothersome
  2. = Moderate Definite warm, burning of the treatment area that is somewhat bothersome.
  3. = Severe Hot burning sensation of the treatment area that causes definite discomfort and may interrupt daily activities and/or sleep
7 days
Self-assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: 7 days
The secondary efficacy endpoints will be the Self-Assessment Questionnaire and the Subject Treatment Satisfaction and Ease of Use Questionnaire. A decrease or increase in response values at Day 3, and Day 7 indicates an improvement compared to baseline response values. Subjects are asked to rate based on a scoring system of the following: from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement/ question being asked.
7 days
Bioinstrumentation Measurements
Time Frame: 7 days
The secondary efficacy endpoints will be the Glossymeter measurements. Measurements of the gloss of the skin, taken at Day 3 and Day 7 in comparison to baseline, will measure the white light, created by LEDs, directly reflected from the skin.
7 days
VISIA-CR Photography
Time Frame: 7 days
VISIA-CR photography taken at Baseline, Day 3 and Day 7 with image analysis at the end of the study.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tanja Emmerich, PhD, SGS Stephens, inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on Anti-aging Serum

Subscribe