Comparing Perioperative Education Modalities for ACL Reconstruction on Patient Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, and Surgical Outcomes

April 7, 2026 updated by: Hayley R. Powell, Mayo Clinic

Comparison of Perioperative Education Modalities for ACL Reconstruction on Patient Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, and Surgical Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this research is to find out whether the way information about surgery is presented to patients affects patient satisfaction, knowledge retention, and surgical outcomes such as anxiety

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
        • Mayo Clinic Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of Senior Attending orthopedic sports medicine surgeons at Mayo Clinic Arizona
  • Patients with a proficiency in English in order to participate without need for translator.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of a primary ACL injury in need of surgical reconstruction utilizing any surgical technique for ACL reconstruction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of ACL injury in need of a surgical revision.
  • Patients who have any multi-ligamentous injuries to the knee requiring modified postoperative unloading.
  • Patients who have history of previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in either leg.
  • Patients who have either auditory or visual impairments.
  • Patients who are medical professionals with work-related knowledge of ACL reconstruction.
  • Patients with an inability or unwillingness of individual or legal guardian to give written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Video-Based Education Group
Approximately 4 weeks before scheduled surgery, participants will receive the video-based intervention regarding pre-and postoperative care for ACL reconstruction.
15-minute video about what to expect before, during, and after your surgery
Experimental: Virtual Classroom Course Group
Approximately 4 weeks before scheduled surgery, participants will receive the classroom-based intervention regarding pre-and postoperative care for ACL reconstruction.
Virtual 30-minute course with an Orthopedic nurse about what to expect before, during, and after your surgery
No Intervention: Standard of Care Group
Participants will receive verbal and written pre-and postoperative instruction as typically received by all ACL reconstruction patients treated by the attending physicians before and after surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the Leiden Perioperative Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Self-reported questionnaire that rates the subjects satisfaction with information provision, discomfort and needs during perioperative care.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the PROMIS Emotional Distress - Anxiety Short Form 8a. Self-reported 8-item questionnaire that rates the subjects emotional distress in the past 7 days on a scale of 1=Never to 5=Always. Higher total scores indicate higher anxiety severity.
24 months
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the PROMIS Self-Efficacy - Manage Symptoms Short Form 8a. Self-reported 8-item questionnaire that rates the subjects current level of confidence to statements about managing symptoms using a scale of 1="I am not at all confident to 5="I am very confident". Higher total score indicate higher confidence in managing symptoms.
24 months
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Self-reported 17-item questionnaire based on evaluation of fear of movement, fear of physical activity, and fear avoidance using a scale of 1=Strongly Disagree to 4=Strongly Agree. Total score range from 17-68 and higher scores indicate severe kinesiophobia.
24 months
Physical Function
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10b. Self-reported 10-item questionnaire that rates the subjects ability to perform an activity using a scale of 5="Without any difficulty" to 1="Unable to do". Higher total scores indicate higher physical function.
24 months
Knowledge Retention
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the ACL Reconstruction Perioperative Education Quiz
24 months
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 6a. Self-reported 6-item questionnaire that rates the subjects pain interference with activities in the past 7 days using a scale of 1="Not at all" to 5="Very much". Higher total scores indicate higher pain interference with activities experienced.
24 months
History of Falls
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the History of Falls Questionnaire. Self-reported 5-item questionnaire asking subjects about falls experienced in the past month and seriousness.
24 months
Lysholm Knee Score
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Self-reported questionnaire that asks subjects to indicate which statement best describes their condition in regards to common complaints frequently experience with knee problems. Total scoring out of 100 and higher score less knee-specific symptoms.
24 months
Activity Level
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the Tegner Activity Scale. Self-reported level of activity prior to injury and post injury. Total of 10 levels and higher levels indicate greater activity level.
24 months
Confidence in Returning to Sport
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the ACL Return to Sport Index. Self-reported 6-item questionnaire to measure the readiness to return to sports after ACL injury or reconstruction. Using a scale from 0 points (extremely negative psychological responses) to 100 points (no negative psychological responses).
24 months
Resilience
Time Frame: 24 months
Measured using the Brief Resilience Scale. Self-reported 6-item questionnaire to measure perceived ability to recover from stress. Total score range 1-5 with higher scores indicating higher resilience.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hayley Powell, MSN, RN, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21-002443

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Clinical Trials on Video-Based Intervention

Subscribe