Evaluation of the Impact of SpO2 Averaging Time on Performance of an Automatic FiO2 Control System: a Randomized Study

March 24, 2025 updated by: Czech Technical University in Prague
The aim of the study is to determine the preferred oximeter averaging setting during automated control of FiO2 (A-FiO2) in infants receiving respiratory support and supplemental oxygen.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are 7 different averaging time settings available with PRICO (Acutronic Medical Systems AG, Hirzel, Switzerland), but after over a year of experience there is no clear clinical impression of the best setting. Therefore, a small systematic study is needed to determine the optimal guidelines.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia, 15500
        • Motol University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 weeks and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All VLBW on respiratory support and oxygen requirements after 2 weeks of age in the NICU are eligible after parental informed consent is obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parental informed consent is not obtained
  • Recording device for automated control of FiO2 is not available

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Averaging time 4to6 s
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 4to6 s for the next 12 hours. All elements of care will be as routinely used, except the changing of the averaging time setting.
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 4to6 s for the next 12 hours.
Other: Averaging time 10 s
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 10 s for the next 12 hours. All elements of care will be as routinely used, except the changing of the averaging time setting.
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 10 s for the next 12 hours.
Other: Averaging time 16 s
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 16 s for the next 12 hours. All elements of care will be as routinely used, except the changing of the averaging time setting.
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 16 s for the next 12 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent time in SpO2 target range
Time Frame: 20 days of intervention on average

Percent time in the intended SpO2 target range (compliance), at SpO2 <86% (safety), and at SpO2 >98% (safety).

Period with SpO2 higher than the target range with FiO2 =0.21 will be included in the target range compliance and excluded from time above the target range.

20 days of intervention on average

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of set SpO2 target range and mode of ventilation on the percent time in SpO2 target range, at SpO2 <86%, and at SpO2 >98%.
Time Frame: 20 days of intervention on average
A general linear model will be used controlling for target range (based on gestational age), mode of ventilation (e.g. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation, Continuous mandatory ventilation, Continuous positive airway pressure, High-flow nasal cannula, and Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation), and subject.
20 days of intervention on average

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jakub Rafl, PhD, Czech Technical University in Prague
  • Principal Investigator: Jan Janota, PhD, Motol University Hospital, Prague
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas E Bachman, MSc, Czech Technical University in Prague
  • Principal Investigator: Veronika Rafl-Huttova, MSc, Czech Technical University in Prague

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be available upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Respiratory Distress

Subscribe