- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05274386
Evaluation of the Impact of SpO2 Averaging Time on Performance of an Automatic FiO2 Control System: a Randomized Study
March 24, 2025 updated by: Czech Technical University in Prague
The aim of the study is to determine the preferred oximeter averaging setting during automated control of FiO2 (A-FiO2) in infants receiving respiratory support and supplemental oxygen.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
- Device: Fabian ventilator with PRICO system (Acutronic Medical Systems AG, Hirzel, Switzerland); SpO2 averaging time set to 4to6 s
- Device: Fabian ventilator with PRICO system (Acutronic Medical Systems AG, Hirzel, Switzerland); SpO2 averaging time set to 10 s
- Device: Fabian ventilator with PRICO system (Acutronic Medical Systems AG, Hirzel, Switzerland); SpO2 averaging time set to 16 s
Detailed Description
There are 7 different averaging time settings available with PRICO (Acutronic Medical Systems AG, Hirzel, Switzerland), but after over a year of experience there is no clear clinical impression of the best setting.
Therefore, a small systematic study is needed to determine the optimal guidelines.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
10
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Prague, Czechia, 15500
- Motol University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
2 weeks and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All VLBW on respiratory support and oxygen requirements after 2 weeks of age in the NICU are eligible after parental informed consent is obtained.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parental informed consent is not obtained
- Recording device for automated control of FiO2 is not available
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Averaging time 4to6 s
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 4to6 s for the next 12 hours.
All elements of care will be as routinely used, except the changing of the averaging time setting.
|
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 4to6 s for the next 12 hours.
|
|
Other: Averaging time 10 s
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 10 s for the next 12 hours.
All elements of care will be as routinely used, except the changing of the averaging time setting.
|
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 10 s for the next 12 hours.
|
|
Other: Averaging time 16 s
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 16 s for the next 12 hours.
All elements of care will be as routinely used, except the changing of the averaging time setting.
|
The SpO2 averaging time will be set to 16 s for the next 12 hours.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent time in SpO2 target range
Time Frame: 20 days of intervention on average
|
Percent time in the intended SpO2 target range (compliance), at SpO2 <86% (safety), and at SpO2 >98% (safety). Period with SpO2 higher than the target range with FiO2 =0.21 will be included in the target range compliance and excluded from time above the target range. |
20 days of intervention on average
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of set SpO2 target range and mode of ventilation on the percent time in SpO2 target range, at SpO2 <86%, and at SpO2 >98%.
Time Frame: 20 days of intervention on average
|
A general linear model will be used controlling for target range (based on gestational age), mode of ventilation (e.g.
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation, Continuous mandatory ventilation, Continuous positive airway pressure, High-flow nasal cannula, and Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation), and subject.
|
20 days of intervention on average
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jakub Rafl, PhD, Czech Technical University in Prague
- Principal Investigator: Jan Janota, PhD, Motol University Hospital, Prague
- Principal Investigator: Thomas E Bachman, MSc, Czech Technical University in Prague
- Principal Investigator: Veronika Rafl-Huttova, MSc, Czech Technical University in Prague
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 17, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 30, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 1, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
March 10, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 24, 2025
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PricoOptisatAvg
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
IPD will be available upon reasonable request
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neonatal Respiratory Distress
-
Xu FalinNanyang Central Hospital; Xinyang Central Hospital; Xinxiang Central Hospital; Zhengzhou... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitation
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterNot yet recruitingSurfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)United States
-
Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General HospitalCompletedRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn | Neonatal Respiratory DisordersIndonesia
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal CreteilPr Xavier DURRMEYERNot yet recruitingNeonatal Respiratory DistressFrance
-
Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan; University of Ibadan; University of Tasmania and other collaboratorsCompletedPrematurity | Oxygen Toxicity | Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions | Neonatal Respiratory FailureNigeria
-
Mansoura University Children HospitalRecruiting
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionGöteborg UniversityNot yet recruitingRespiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant | Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Newborn | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (& [Hyaline Membrane Disease]) | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
-
Sharp HealthCareChiesi USA, Inc.Enrolling by invitationSurfactant | Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)United States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingNeonatal Respiratory DistressEgypt
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephCompletedEarly Neonatal Respiratory Distress: Changes in Level IIb Hospital Over a Period of One Year (DROPE)Neonatal Respiratory Distress SyndromeFrance