STS Administration on Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Patients in Critical Care (H4COVID)

January 11, 2023 updated by: Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis

Hydrogen Sulfate Guided Therapy With STS for COVID-19 Patients in Need of Critical Care: The H4COVID Open-label, Randomized, Triple-arm Trial

The primary purpose is to describe the safety of administration of three doses of STS to critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19. A secondary purpose is to describe data on the clinical efficacy of administration of up to three doses of STS in critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With the appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic, a race for the discovery of effective treatments to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection and its sequelae commenced. Some patients with COVID-19 develop severe acute respiratory syndrome which is the main reason for death. The aim of this study is to spearhead pharmacotherapeutic solutions for COVID-19 patients in the intensive care which have proven to be the hardest to treat due to the high death rate, the long-term allocation of patients in ICU, and the slow recovery that oftentimes leads to residual symptoms and signs. The ever-increasing pressure on the health care system requires finding an effective treatment that can benefit even advanced-stage patients such as those in the intensive care unit.

It was not until recently that the published literature about hydrogen sulfide shifted from revolving around its toxicity to its recognition as an endogenous gaseous signaling molecule and its biological roles. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) is a novel gaseous signaling molecule (gasotransmitter) that regulates a variety of physiological functions and provides protection against organ damage (anti-inflammatory, prolonged survival, cardioprotection, antioxidant, and more). H2S also displays beneficial roles in preventing lung disorders such as pneumonia, lung injury (acute/ chronic), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and limits viral replication. H2S has been shown to be effective in reversing lung inflammation and improving pulmonary function in various animal models. Based on preclinical data, cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE)-derived H2S or exogenously applied H2S may block Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) entry into the host cells by interrupting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2) and transmembrane protease serine-2 (TMPRSS2), inhibiting viral replication by attenuating syncytium formation and virus assembly/release, and thus may protect SARS-CoV-2-induced lung damage by suppressing the immune response and the development of inflammation.

Lymphopenia is a key characteristic of COVID-19 patients. Serum H2S was positively correlated with the lymphocyte count and is considered a predictor of mortality. Additionally reduced H2S bioavailability has been suggested as an indicator of enhanced pro-inflammatory responses and endothelial dysfunction. Both these conditions often accompany severe COVID-19. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been proposed as the principle pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the cytokine storm that leads to severe lung injury, respiratory failure, and death by COVID-19. A negative association between IL-6 and serum H2S has been shown to exist. The above-mentioned results led to further evaluation of admission H2S levels as a marker of survival in a recent study. Results showed that serum levels of H2S on day 1 lower than 150.44 micromolars (μM) had the best tradeoff for sensitivity and specificity for death. Thus, administration of a H2S-donor could be a potential remedy for COVID-19 by relieving the damage in lungs and other organs.

Sodium thiosulfate (STS) is a H2S-donor with known safety and efficacy profile in humans for other diseases, including calciphylaxis and cyanide poisoning. STS can be metabolized to H2S and acts as a precursor for H2S signaling. Moreover, in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, a phase 1 study was conducted, showing that STS was well tolerated, even with concomitant use of blood pressure lowering drugs. Additionally, the Groningen Intervention study for Preservation of cardiac function with Sodium thiosulfate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (GIPS-IV trial) is the first trial in humans designed to test the hypothesis that STS provides protection against I/R injury in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Evangelos Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +302107480662
  • Email: egiamarel@med.uoa.gr

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Antigoni Kotsaki, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +306946637164
  • Email: scra@sepsis.gr

Study Locations

    • Kifisia
      • Athens, Kifisia, Greece, 14561
        • Recruiting
        • General Hospitan of Athens KAT 2nd Department of ICU
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 110 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age equal to or older than 18 years
  2. Both genders
  3. For women of childbearing potential, they must use or be willing to use a dual contraceptive method during the study.
  4. Written consent statement provided by the patient or his / her legal representative in case patients are unable to consent.
  5. Confirmed COVID-19 disease
  6. WHO-CPS 7 to 9
  7. Hospitalization in Intensive Care Unit
  8. Serum H2S levels less than 140 μM

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 18 years
  2. Denial of written consent
  3. Decision not to resuscitate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard Treatment
The standard treatment includes the application of mechanical ventilation and / or support with the administration of inotropes and / or extracorporeal oxygenation (ECMO) and the intravenous administration of fluids and dexamethasone. The administration of any other immunosuppressive therapy, including tocilizumab and / or antimicrobials at the discretion of the therapists, is permitted.
Experimental: One intravenous 12.5 gr STS - Treatment Group 1
Patients will receive standard treatment and one intravenous (iv)12.5 gr STS in 60 minutes continuous intravenous infusion. STS is dissolved in a final volume of 100ml N/S 0.9% w/v,
The drug will be administered via continuous infusion after being diluted to a concentration 12.5 gr/100ml
Other Names:
  • NATRIUMTHIOSULFAT 25%
Experimental: Three intravenous doses of 12.5 gr STS - Treatment Group 2
Patients will receive standard treatment and three intravenous doses of 12.5 g STS. STS is dissolved in a final volume of 100ml N/S 0.9% w/v. Each dose will be given in 60 minutes of continuous intravenous infusion with 48 hours intervals between each dose.
The drug will be administered via continuous infusion after being diluted to a concentration 12.5 gr/100ml
Other Names:
  • NATRIUMTHIOSULFAT 25%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of treatment-emergent serious and non-serious adverse events between treatment groups.
Time Frame: Visit study day 28
Change in the number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) among treatment groups
Visit study day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
World Health Organization clinical progression scale (WHO-CPS) on day 7 from inclusion in the study
Time Frame: Visit study day 7
Change in the WHO-CPS score on day 7 from inclusion in the study. The minimum WHO-CPS score is 0 for uninfected patients (no viral RNA detected) and the maximum is 10 for patients who are dead. Higher scores equals worse outcome
Visit study day 7
WHO-CPS on day 14 from inclusion in the study
Time Frame: Visit study day 14
Change in the WHO-CPS score on day 14 from inclusion in the study. The minimum WHO-CPS score is 0 for uninfected patients (no viral RNA detected) and the maximum is 10 for patients who are dead. Higher scores equals worse outcome
Visit study day 14
WHO-CPS on day 28 from inclusion in the study
Time Frame: Visit study day 28
Change in the WHO-CPS score on day 28 from inclusion in the study. The minimum WHO-CPS score is 0 for uninfected patients (no viral RNA detected) and the maximum is 10 for patients who are dead. Higher scores equal worse outcome
Visit study day 28
Average value of the total sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on day 7
Time Frame: Visit study day 7
change between baseline sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and measured sequential organ failure assessment SOFA score at Study Day 7. The minimum score is 0 points if the patient has PaO2/FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) ≥400 mmHg, ≥150 Platelets (per mm3), hypotension (MAP ≥ 70mmHg), 15 on the Glasgow Scale, <1.2 bilirubin and creatinine or urine output (mg/dl). Maximum SOFA score is 24. if the patient has PaO2/FiO2 <100 mmHg, <20 Platelets (per mm3), Adrenaline >0.1 or Noradrenaline >0.1μg/kg/min , <6 on the Glasgow Scale, ≥12 bilirubin and ≥5.0 or <200ml/day creatinine or urine output (mg/dl).
Visit study day 7
Hydrogen sulfide concentrations daily until day 7 in patient's blood serum.
Time Frame: Visit study day 1 until visit day 7
Change in patients blood serum concentrations of hydrogen sulfide levels from day 1 until day 7.
Visit study day 1 until visit day 7
IL-6 cytokine concentrations daily until day 7 in patient's blood serum.
Time Frame: Visit study day 1 until visit day 7
Change in patients blood serum concentrations of cytokine IL-6 levels from visit study day 1 until visit study day 7
Visit study day 1 until visit day 7
Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) cytokine concentrations daily until day 7 in patient's blood serum.
Time Frame: Visit study day 1 until visit day 7
Change in patients blood serum concentrations of cytokine TNF levels from visit study day 1 until visit study day 7
Visit study day 1 until visit day 7
Change in the production of Th1, Th2, and T17 cytokines from mononuclear cells of patient's blood on days 1,4 and 7
Time Frame: Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Comparison of cytokine production on patients' blood serum by stimulation of monocytes, Th1, Th2, and T17 cells on visit study day 1, visit study day 4, and visit study day 7.
Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Ferritin concentrations on days 1,4 and 7
Time Frame: Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Changes in patients blood serum concentrations of ferritin levels on visit study day 1, visit study day 4 and visit study day 7
Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
C-reactive protein concentrations on days 1,4 and 7
Time Frame: Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Changes in patients blood serum concentrations of C-reactive protein levels on visit study day 1, visit study day 4 and visit study day 7
Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
D-dimers concentrations on days 1,4 and 7
Time Frame: Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Changes in patients blood serum concentrations of d-dimers levels on visit study day 1, visit study day 4 and visit study day 7
Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Cytokine IL-6 concentrations on days 1,4 and 7
Time Frame: Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7
Changes in patients blood serum concentrations of IL-6 levels on visit study day 1, visit study day 4 and visit study day 7
Visit study day 1, Visit study day 4, Visit study day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ioannis Alamanos, MD, General Hospital of Athens KAT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Virus Diseases

Clinical Trials on Sodium Thiosulfate 25% Solution for Injection

Subscribe