Community Health Worker Training to Reduce Depression and Substance Use Stigma in TB/HIV Care in South Africa (Siyakhana)

February 12, 2025 updated by: University of Maryland, College Park

Training CHWs to Support Re-Engagement in TB/HIV Care in the Context of Depression and Substance Use

Poor engagement in care contributes to HIV- and TB-related morbidity and mortality in South Africa (SA). Community health workers (CHWs) are frontline lay health workers who work to re-engage patients who are lost to follow-up (LTFU) in HIV/TB care. Patients with depression and substance use (SU) have a greater likelihood of being LTFU in HIV/TB care, and there is evidence that CHWs may exhibit stigma towards these patients. When CHWs have negative attitudes towards these patients, on average they spend less time with these patients, are less likely to implement evidence-based practices, and deliver less patient-centered care. Therefore, this purpose of this study is to examine the implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a brief training ("Siyakhana"). The purpose of this training is to provide CHWs with psychoeducation, skills, and support around working with HIV/TB patients with depression/SU. The investigators will assess the training's implementation and changes in CHWs' stigma towards HIV/TB patients with depression/SU.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

South Africa (SA) has the highest number of people living with HIV in the world and a high tuberculosis (TB) burden. Poor engagement in care contributes to HIV- and TB-related morbidity and mortality. In this context, community health workers (CHWs) are frontline lay health workers who play a central role in re-engaging patients who are lost to follow-up (LTFU) in HIV/TB care. Even with existing CHW programs focused on re-engaging patients who are LTFU, people with depression, hazardous alcohol use, or other substance use (SU) are particularly susceptible to poor engagement in HIV/TB care and have a greater likelihood of being LTFU. At the moment, CHWs receive minimal, if any, training on depression and SU, and there is some evidence that CHWs may exhibit stigma towards these patients. When CHWs have negative attitudes towards these patients, on average they spend less time with these patients, are less likely to implement evidence-based practices, and deliver less patient-centered care. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a brief training ("Siyakhana") focused on providing CHWs with psychoeducation, skills, and support around working with patients with depression/SU. In a Type 2, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial, and using a stepped wedge design, the investigators will primarily assess the training's implementation (feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity) and changes in CHWs' stigma towards HIV/TB patients with depression/SU.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
        • South African Medical Research Council

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years old
  • Employed as a CHW through a partner non-governmental organization (NGO) that provides HIV/TB CHW services
  • Works with patients who have HIV and TB, some of whom may be struggling with depression or substance use

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete informed consent or study procedures in English or Xhosa

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment As Usual (TAU)
Monitoring of treatment as usual (i.e., routine interactions between community health workers (CHWs) and their patients).
Experimental: Siyakhana CHW Training
The Siyakhana CHW Training is a multi-day group training that aims to reduce stigma around mental health and substance use among CHWs. It integrates psychoeducation around TB/HIV, stigma, depression, and substance use, including countering myths and stereotypes around mental health and substance use; skills for CHW self-care; evidence-based skills for working with patients living with depression and substance use, such as components of motivational interviewing and problem-solving therapy; and exposure to individuals with lived experience of mental health and substance use. The training is a combination of informative presentations, discussions, worksheets/activities, and role-plays aimed at increasing awareness of mental health and substance use, reducing stigma, and improving interactions when working with patients with HIV/TB and mental health and substance use concerns.
Please see arm description.
Other Names:
  • Siyakhana
  • Siyakhana - C

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: 3-months post-training
Acceptability subscale of the John Hopkins D&I Measure, a 12-item measure for assessing dissemination and implementation outcomes in low- and middle-income settings. This measure will specifically assess CHW's perceived satisfaction, relevance, usefulness, comprehension, and comfort level of the training. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale, and averaged, with lower scores (closer to 0) indicating low acceptability and higher scores (closer to 3) indicating higher acceptability.
3-months post-training
CHW Stigma Towards Substance Use
Time Frame: Change between baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up (approximately 6-months post-training)
CHW stigma towards substance use measured using the Social Distance Scale (SDS). SDS scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating more desired social distance (more stigma).
Change between baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up (approximately 6-months post-training)
CHW Stigma Towards Depression
Time Frame: Change between baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up (approximately 6-months post-training)
CHW stigma towards depression measured using the Social Distance Scale (SDS). SDS scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating more desired social distance (more stigma).
Change between baseline assessment and 6-month follow-up (approximately 6-months post-training)
Training Feasibility
Time Frame: 3-months post-training
The number of CHWs who attended all three days of the Siyakhana training. The training will be considered feasible if over 75% of CHWs attend the full training.
3-months post-training
CHW Training Fidelity
Time Frame: 3-months post-training
20% of CHW role-plays at the 3-month follow-up assessment (approximately 3-months post-training) randomly selected for rating using the ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) tool, a 15-item validated measure of fidelity and clinical competence among non-specialist workers, by two independent bilingual assessors. Ratings were given for 15 clinical competencies, giving scores of 1 (harmful), 2 (some basic skills), 3 (all basic skills), or 4 (advanced skills). CHW fidelity scores were calculated based on ENACT items rated as delivered with competence. A cut-off of ≥2 (some basic skills) was used to define fidelity for each item.
3-months post-training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CHW Stigma Towards Substance Use
Time Frame: Change between baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up (approximately 3-months post-training)
CHW stigma towards substance use measured using the Social Distance Scale (SDS). SDS scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating more desired social distance (more stigma).
Change between baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up (approximately 3-months post-training)
CHW Stigma Towards Depression
Time Frame: Change between baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up (approximately 3-months post-training)
CHW stigma towards depression measured using the Social Distance Scale (SDS). SDS scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating more desired social distance (more stigma).
Change between baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up (approximately 3-months post-training)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bronwyn J Myers, PhD, Medical Research Council, South Africa
  • Principal Investigator: Jessica F Magidson, PhD, University of Maryland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After all primary analyses are complete, de-identified data will be available per request of outside individual.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the study has been complete (all data collected; data analysis only), the Study Protocol, Informed Consent Forms (ICFs), and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) will be made available per request of outside individual.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Supporting information will be made available per request of outside individuals.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance-Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on Siyakhana CHW Training

Subscribe