An Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the CathVision ECGenius® System.

August 28, 2024 updated by: CathVision ApS

A Prospective, Single-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Technical Performance of the CathVision ECGenius® System.

The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and technical performance of the CathVision ECGenius® System. The secondary objective is to benchmark the intracardiac electrogram signal quality compared to commercially available systems in patients undergoing assessment and ablation of cardiac arrhythmias.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A prospective, single center, open-label, single arm study to evaluate the safety and technical performance of the CathVision ECGenius® system.

Patients undergoing assessment and ablation of cardiac arrhythmias during an electrophysiology (EP) procedure, and who meet all inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study and undergo the EP procedure. Intracardiac signals will be passively recorded using the CathVision ECGenius® System in parallel with a commercial EP recording system and later compared and evaluated. The investigational device will not be used for direct clinical care decisions or therapy. The EP procedure will be guided by the study site Standards Of Care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
        • The University of Vermont

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients indicated for EP study or cardiac ablation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is scheduled for catheter ablation or diagnostic electrophysiology procedure.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent or obtain consent from a legally authorized representative (LAR).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient inability to understand or refusal to sign informed consent.
  • Patient is a prisoner or under incarceration
  • Patients who in the opinion of the physician are not candidates for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Noise Comparison
Time Frame: EP and ablation procedures can take up to six hours
Measure the peak to peak baseline noise in two EP recording systems for both bipolar and unipolar electrograms in μV
EP and ablation procedures can take up to six hours
Freedom From Major Adverse Events, Evaluated at Hospital Discharge
Time Frame: From EP procedure to discharge is usually one day.

Freedom from major adverse events, evaluated at hospital discharge

Adverse events were categorized as one of:

An adverse event (AE) A serious adverse event (SAE) An Adverse device effect (ADE) is an AE related to the use of an investigational medical device.

A Serious adverse device effect (SADE) is an ADE that that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of an SAE.

An unanticipated adverse device effect (UADE) is defined as any serious adverse effect on health, safety, any life-threatening problem, death caused by or associated with, a device, if that effect, problem, or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in predicate devices, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety, or welfare of subjects.

From EP procedure to discharge is usually one day.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathaniel C Thompson, MD PhD, The University of Vermont Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrhythmia

Clinical Trials on Electrophysiology procedure

Subscribe