Evaluation of the Impact of Lesions of the Motor and Proprioceptive Brain and Pan-medullary Pathways on Their Clinically and Electrophysiologically Assessed Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MS-TRACTS)

March 5, 2024 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common acquired neurological disease leading to disability, especially ambulatory, in young adults. To date, the correlation between the number or volume of white matter lesions seen on conventional MRI and the degree of disability of patients remains low to moderate. This phenomenon is known as the "clinical-radiological paradox".

In this new project, we hypothesize that an evaluation of the corticospinal pathways including their thoracic medullary portion, as well as taking into account the severity of the lesions using quantitative MRI, will allow the investigators to refine the correlation with ambulatory disability in MS patients. We will complete the evaluation of motor pathways with those of the proprioceptive pathways also strongly involved in ambulation.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common acquired neurological disease leading to disability, especially ambulatory, in young adults. To date, the correlation between the number or volume of white matter lesions seen on conventional MRI and the degree of disability of patients remains low to moderate. This phenomenon is known as the "clinical-radiological paradox".

The impact of the precise localisation of focal MS lesions on certain circuits particularly involved in ambulation, such as pyramidal or proprioceptive beams, has however been little studied in imaging, mainly due to technical limitations. Indeed, such studies require the acquisition of brain and spinal cord MRI images of sufficient spatial resolution to allow the localisation of focal lesions and pathways. Several previous studies have shown encouraging results by separately studying damage to the brain or spinal cord portion of the corticospinal bundle and relating it to disability. To our knowledge, no studies have analysed the lesional involvement of the cortico-spinal bundle or the entire proprioceptive bundle from the motor cortex to the medullary cone in patients with MS.

In a preliminary study, we studied the cerebral spinal cortex and cervical spinal cord bundle using data from the PHRC 2012 EMISEP and obtained encouraging results. In particular, we have shown that the cortico-spinal pathways are very frequently affected by focal lesions in the early years of the disease and that it is already correlated with the functional consequences in patients measured clinically and in electrophysiology.

In this new project, we hypothesize that an evaluation of the corticospinal pathways including their thoracic medullary portion, as well as taking into account the severity of the lesions using quantitative MRI, will allow the investigators to refine the correlation with ambulatory disability in MS patients. We will complete the evaluation of motor pathways with those of the proprioceptive pathways also strongly involved in ambulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France
        • AP-HM Timone
      • Rennes, France
        • CHU Rennes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients :

  • More than 18 years old
  • relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis according to Mac Donald criteria (2010)
  • EDSS score at the inclusion from 0 to 4
  • With at least 1 symptom of pyramidal injury during clinical exam
  • Written informed consent
  • Affiliated to a Health Care system

Healthy Volunteers:

  • More than 18 years old
  • Written informed consent
  • Affiliated to a Health Care system

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients

  • progressive MS ;
  • Corticoids during the last 60 days before inclusion ;
  • Other neurological disease or Other progressive systemic disease
  • adults subject to legal protection or persons deprived of liberty
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Contraindications to motor evoked potentials
  • Current pregnancy or breast-feeding

Healthy volunteers:

  • History of disease affecting central nervous system
  • Familial history of MS
  • History of medullar injury
  • Spinal osteoarthritis which can lead to a spinal hypersignal ;
  • adults subject to legal protection or persons deprived of liberty
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Contraindications to motor evoked potentials
  • Current pregnancy or breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients
MRI protocol is different, a little bit longer than MRI in routine for patients. For healthy volunteer, a specific MRI for this study is done
Electrophysiology will be done during routine visits for patients and during inclusion visit to healthy volunteers
Other: Healthy Volunteer
MRI protocol is different, a little bit longer than MRI in routine for patients. For healthy volunteer, a specific MRI for this study is done
Electrophysiology will be done during routine visits for patients and during inclusion visit to healthy volunteers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
association ratio between EDSS score and focal injury fraction at inclusion
Time Frame: 24 months
EDSS score is a specific multiple sclerosis scale, named Expanded Disability Status Scale, from 0 (normal neurological status) to 10 (death kinked to sclerosis). Focal injury fraction is focal injury volume divided by the volume of goal zone and will be assessed by MRI analysis.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: 24 months

Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) during patients follow up. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.

The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability. Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist.

24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Time Frame: 24 months

Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) during patients follow up. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.

The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability. Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist.

The severity of the lesions will be assessed by the volume of the focal lesion load on the motor and sensory pathways, and by the value of the average magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) within the lesions

24 months
Differences in central conduction times between patients and healthy volunteers
Time Frame: 1 day
Significance of the differences in central conduction time values of motor and somaesthetic evoked potentials and in mean MTR values of motor and sensory pathways, between patients and healthy volunteers. Central conduction time values of motor and somaesthetic evoked potentials in healthy subjects and patients as well as on the averages of MTR (magnetic transfer ratio) values of motor and sensory pathways at the encephalic and medullary level, between patients and healthy volunteers
1 day
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25W)
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25W) during patients follow up. The T25-FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-walk. It is the first component of the MSFC to be administered at each visit. The patient is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible. he task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. The score for the T25-FWis the average of the two completed trials.
24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25W)
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25W) during patients follow up. The T25-FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-walk. It is the first component of the MSFC to be administered at each visit. The patient is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible. he task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. The score for the T25-FWis the average of the two completed trials.The severity of the lesions will be assessed by the volume of the focal lesion load on the motor and sensory pathways, and by the value of the average magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) within the lesions
24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT)
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT) during patients follow up. The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is used to measure finger dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnose. Scores are based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds
24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT)
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT) during patients follow up. The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is used to measure finger dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnose. Scores are based on the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds. The severity of the lesions will be assessed by the volume of the focal lesion load on the motor and sensory pathways, and by the value of the average magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) within the lesions
24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in walking distance
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in walking distance using 6-minutes walk test (6MWT) during patients follow up. The score of the test is the distance a patient walks in 6 minutes.
24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in walking distance
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and changes in walking distance using 6-minutes walk test (6MWT) during patients follow up. The score of the test is the distance a patient walks in 6 minutes. The severity of the lesions will be assessed by the volume of the focal lesion load on the motor and sensory pathways, and by the value of the average magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) within the lesions
24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in 12-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS12) score
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between focal lesion load and changes in 12-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS12) during patients follow up. The 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) is a patient-reported outcome that assesses the impact of walking impairment in people with multiple sclerosis. The EQ-5D-3L is a validated, generic, preference-based, health-status measure consisting of five descriptive questions encompassing five domains of HRQoL (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each question is answered based on three response options (1= "no problems", 2= "moderate problems", 3= "severe problems"), with the 243 potential patterns of responses enabling classification of a participant into a distinct health state associated with a specific index score.
24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and all limbs electrophysiology parameters
Time Frame: 24 months
Correlation between the severity of lesions and all limbs electrophysiology parameters : Electrophysiology (all 4 limbs) with the central conduction time of motor evoked potentials and the central conduction time of somesthetic evoked potentials. The severity of the lesions will be assessed by the volume of the focal lesion load on the motor and sensory pathways, and by the value of the average magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) within the lesions
24 months
Correlation between in focal lesion load of pathways and changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale
Time Frame: 24 months
The amount of focal lesion load in the motor and proprioceptive pathways will be correlated with the change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score during patients follow up.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raphael Chouteau, Md, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Clinical Trials on MRI

3
Subscribe