Evaluation of The Immediate Effect of Myofascial Release Application in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Evaluation of The Immediate Effect of Myofascial Release Application on Pain, Flexibility and Trunk Mobility in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Purpose: To determine the immediate effect of myofascial release application on pain, flexibility and trunk mobility in chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Materials and methods: Forty patients with CLBP participated in this experimental study. Participants were grouped in randomized control. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment. Sit-Reach Test for flexibility evaluation and Straight Leg Raising Test with goniometric measurement for hamstring flexibility were used. Modified Schober Test was applied to evaluate trunk mobility. Comparison of the pre- and post-treatment evaluation data of the individuals in the same group was made using the "Wilcoxen Sum Rank Test", one of the non-parametric tests. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment evaluation data of both groups was performed using the non-parametric evaluation "Mann-Whitney U Test".

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Chronic Low-back Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Myofascial release; Behavioral: Classical massage

Detailed Description

It was aimed to determine the immediate effect of myofascial release application on pain, flexibility and trunk mobility in chronic low back pain (CLBP). Forty patients with CLBP participated in this experimental study. Participants were grouped in randomized control. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment. Sit-Reach Test for flexibility evaluation and Straight Leg Raising Test with goniometric measurement for hamstring flexibility were used. Modified Schober Test was applied to evaluate trunk mobility. Comparison of the pre- and post-treatment evaluation data of the individuals in the same group was made using the "Wilcoxen Sum Rank Test", one of the non-parametric tests. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment evaluation data of both groups was performed using the non-parametric evaluation "Mann-Whitney U Test".

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 40
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • Eyupsultan
    • Istanbul, Eyupsultan, Turkey, 2022
      • Halic University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 55 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. age between 20 and 55 years;
2. low back pain lasting more than 3 months;
3. stable clinical status;
4. no cognitive and mental problems;
5. self-expression ability;
6. volunteering to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. problems of cooperation;
2. malignancy or infection;
3. acute fractures;
4. occlusive edema;
5. osteoporosis;
6. advanced degenerative joint problems;
7. acute rheumatologic conditions;
8. cortisone therapy;
9. use of blood thinners;
10. skin problems.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group; Myofascial release was applied to the experimental group	Behavioral: Myofascial release; The physiotherapist placed both palms on the two right and left ribs at the T12 level and applied continuous stretching to the superior for 2 minutes. After this application, the physiotherapist placed one hand on the sacrum with the other hand on T12 with his hands crossed, and applied rhythmically 2 seconds of stretching and 2 seconds of relaxation for a total of 2 minutes. Then, myofascial release was terminated by applying deep compression to the paraspinal muscles with palms for 2 minutes on the right and 2 minutes on the left side, respectively.
Active Comparator: Control Group; Classical massage was applied to the control group	Behavioral: Classical massage; Classical massage was applied to the lumbar region for 9 minutes. Classical massage was applied with the patient in the prone position. A small amount of solid vaseline was taken and a gentle stroke was applied for 1 minute to spread it sufficiently to the lumbar region. Then, superficial stroking was applied to the right paraspinal region for 1 minute from distal to proximal by the physiotherapist. After the same procedure was performed on the right paraspinal region for 1 minute. Then, both hands were placed on the right and left paraspinal region and friction was applied for 2 minutes. Afterwards, the patient's right paraspinal region was kneeding for 1 minute and then the same procedure was applied to the left paraspinal region for 1 minute. As the last procedure, the fingertips of both hands were placed on the right and left paraspinal region and the classical massage was completed by performing 2 minutes of deep euphlorage from the L5-S1 level to the T12 level.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score	The VAS is a widely used scale for pain assessment in daily practice. VAS, with 0-10 numbers on it and they are asked to give a value between these numbers. 0: I have no pain, 10: I have very severe pain	Baseline, immediately after the intervention
Change in The Straight Leg Raise Test Score	test was used to assess hamstring flexibility. While the patient is in the supine position, the physiotherapist makes passive hip flexion with the knee straight and the measurement is made with a goniometer.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention
Change in The Modified Schober Test Score	Test is an assessment method that measures lumbar flexion flexibility. The lumbosacral junction and 10 cm above were marked when the person was in an upright position. Then third mark was placed 5 cm below the lumbosacral junction. After anterior flexion as far forward as possible, the distance between the highest and lowest marks was measured.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention
Change in Sit and Reach Test Score	test was used for flexibility evaluation. While the patient was performing maximum trunk flexion in the knee extension, the distance between the fingertip and the box aganist the sole of the foot was measured as +/- centimeters	Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Halic University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Boff TA, Pasinato F, Ben AJ, Bosmans JE, van Tulder M, Carregaro RL. Effectiveness of spinal manipulation and myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone on health-related outcomes in individuals with non-specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
• Lohr C, Medina-Porqueres I. Immediate effects of myofascial release on neuromechanical characteristics in female and male patients with low back pain and healthy controls as assessed by tensiomyography. A controlled matched-pair study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2021 Apr;84:105351. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105351. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
• Arguisuelas MD, Lison JF, Sanchez-Zuriaga D, Martinez-Hurtado I, Domenech-Fernandez J. Effects of Myofascial Release in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):627-634. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001897.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 5, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 30, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): May 27, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 7, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 21, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): March 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 31, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 21, 2022
• Last Verified: March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Chronic low back pain; Myofascial release; Flexibility
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Back Pain; Low Back Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: acetinkaya

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No