Motivational Program on Physical Activity in Cardio-respiratory Patients: an RCT Study

November 6, 2024 updated by: Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

Effects of Physical Activity of an In-hospital Motivational Program in Cardio-respiratory Patients: a Randomized Control Trial

According to actual scientific evidence, the interventions on the general population aiming at regular physical activity are one of the most efficient strategies for health improvement. Regardless of this evidence, there is a large part of the elderly population does not adhere to the recommendations of the international guidelines on daily physical activity.

This is even more evident in patients with chronic respiratory and cardiological disease because exercise exacerbates existing symptoms of breathlessness.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of an in-hospital motivational program dedicated to increasing physical activity. With the data of an electronic wristwatch that keeps records of movement, the health professionals incentive an increase in physical activity leading to long term behavioural changes (evaluated by the number of steps per day) in hospitalized patients with COPD and HF, which already perform a standard rehabilitation program (14 sessions).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

There are studies in the literature that have reported, in comparison with healthy subjects, a lower level of physical activity in COPD patients; other studies associate less physical activity with increased risk of hospitalization and mortality, which is even more evident considering patients with chronic respiratory diseases. In the same way, patients with Heart Failure (HF) reduce their activity and exercise capacity increasing hospitalization and mortality.

With more fatigue and dyspnoea, a vicious circle is created, with a consequent further reduction of levels of physical activity and worsening of symptoms.

Therefore, it is necessary to provide augmented physical activity in rehabilitation hospital environments.

Rehabilitation is a way to encourage and support patients to achieve their best physical condition. At present, COPD and HF patients admitted in rehabilitative cardio-respiratory wards dedicate a limited amount of time to physical activity, when referred to the entire day of hospitalization, whereas the rest of their time is spent in a sedentary condition. Thus, it is difficult to imagine that an actual change in the patients' lifestyle can be obtained by such a cardio-respiratory rehabilitation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Brescia
      • Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy, 25065
        • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years, both of genders;
  • Scheduled time of hospitalization of at least 14-16 days;
  • Ability to walk by themselves, with safety (SPPB >10);
  • Hospital admission with a diagnosis of COPD (GOLD III-IV, B-D), with or without respiratory failure, or HF (NYHA II-III), sufficiently stabilized with a specific pharmacological therapy
  • Possession of a smartphone and ability to use the app for health tracking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant symptoms of the primary disorder, not properly stabilized;
  • Hemodynamic and clinic instability;
  • Musculoskeletal issues or other types (neurological, orthopedical…), which involve an important limitation in physical exercise performance;
  • Medical comorbidities with a life expectancy shorter than one year;
  • Clinical signs of cognitive impairment (MMSE < 25).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational group
The patients of this group will be equipped with an electronic wristwatch and will be monitored every day by the physiotherapist (PT) through an application on their mobiles. The PT will follow these patients with a daily motivational session (15 minutes, modality 1 patient: 1 PT) and with an educational program about the definition, importance and benefits of physical activity.
In addition to the activities of the usual rehabilitation program, the PT will perform a daily motivational session of 15 minutes in a 1 patient: 1 physiotherapist modality. On that occasion, the patient will report the number of steps performed the previous day; the physiotherapist will check and promote the increase of 10% in the number of steps for the next day. If the patient fails to achieve the goal, the PT will analyze the reasons with the patient, in order to facilitate the achievement of the goal. The PT will advise on the time and place to perform physical activity and the patients will receive a diary to record his/her progress (number of steps and heart rate, Borg Fatigue and Borg Dyspnea before and after an exercise task). The PT will record all these evaluations on an excel database.
Sham Comparator: Control
The patients of this group will have an electronic wristwatch and will be advised by the PT only with generic recommendations of daily exercise during the hospitalization, besides the usual activities of the rehabilitation program.
Besides the activities of the usual rehabilitation program, the patients of this group will be provided by the PT only with the generic recommendations of daily exercise during the in-hospital stay
Other Names:
  • Generic recommendations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta change in number of steps per day
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17
To evaluate the impact of a motivational program, by an electronic wristwatch for health tracking dedicated to improving physical activity, on behavioural changes (number of steps per day) in hospitalized patients with COPD and HF, which already have performed a standard rehabilitation program.
Day 0 and day 17

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delta change in PASE Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17
The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) is an easily administered and scored instrument that measures the level of physical activity in individuals aged 65 years and older. It is divided into two main sections, one for the activities performed in the spare time, and one for household activities. The total score is obtained by multiplying the time amount spent on each free-time activity (hours/day/week) or household activity (yes/no) by certain values derived empirically for each of them; the sum of all activities correlates with the physical activity level.
Day 0 and day 17
Delta change in 6 MWT
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17

The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.

This assessment will include also the Borg Scale for Dyspnoea and Fatigue. They both have a minimum score, 0, and a maximum score, 10. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (either for dyspnoea or for fatigue).

Day 0 and day 17
Delta change in SPPB Scale
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17
The SPPB Scale evaluates the level of safety in motor ability. It is divided into three items, each ranging from 0 to 4. The first item is balance (the score is assigned according to the difficulty level in keeping balance), the second is walking (the score reflects the amount of time taken to walk a distance of 4 meters), and the third is the 1-Minute-Sit-To-Stand-Test (the score is determined by the number of lifts from sitting to standing, performed within the first 5 seconds in one minute. The sum of the scores for each item may vary from 0, which indicates the complete motor inability, to a maximum of 12, which indicates a total motor autonomy.
Day 0 and day 17
Delta change in EMI-2 questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17
The EMI (Markland and Hardy, 1993) was developed as a means of assessing participation motives in order to examine such issues as the influence of motives on exercise participation, how such motives might influence the choice of activities undertaken, how affective responses to exercise may be influenced by reasons for exercising and how involvement in physical activity might have a reciprocal influence on participation motives. In particular, the authors developed the instrument to examine questions concerning the functional significance of exercise motives from the perspective of Deci and Ryan's (1985) self-determination theory. It is presented as a list of 51 motivational sentences, each of them is assigned a score from 0 (totally false) to 5 (totally true). The sum of each score is the final result, ranging from a minimum of 0 (absence of motivation to do exercise) to a maximum of 255 (highest motivation to do exercise).
Day 0 and day 17
Delta change in SF-12 questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17

The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure.

The SF-12 uses the same eight domains as the SF-36:

  1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems.
  2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems
  3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems
  4. Bodily pain
  5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being)
  6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems
  7. Vitality (energy and fatigue)
  8. General health perceptions. Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). The PCS includes 6 questions concerning different issues. Two questions are about physical activit
Day 0 and day 17
Delta change in BDI questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 17

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item self-reporting questionnaire for evaluating the severity of depression in normal and psychiatric populations.

Twenty-one items were consolidated from those observations and ranked 0-3 for severity. The questionnaire is administered by health professionals. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

Day 0 and day 17

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michele Vitacca, MD, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CE 2608

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Protocol submitted to technical and Scientific Committee and Ethical Committee

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiorespiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Motivational group

Subscribe